elpais.com
Typhoid Mary: A Cook's Tale of Controversy
Anthony Bourdain's book reexamines the life of Mary Mallon, a cook who unknowingly spread typhoid fever, highlighting early 20th-century New York's public health challenges and social inequalities.
- What is the central argument Bourdain makes in his book about Mary Mallon?
- Bourdain portrays Mary Mallon not as a malicious villain, but as a product of her time and circumstances—a defiant woman caught in a system that failed to address public health issues and discriminated against immigrants. He questions the methods used against her, suggesting a lack of compassion and understanding.
- What are the lasting implications of Mary Mallon's story, as presented by Bourdain?
- Bourdain's work raises questions about societal responsibility regarding public health, the ethical treatment of individuals with infectious diseases, and the historical context of how such issues were addressed (or not) in the early 20th century, particularly in relation to social class and immigration status.
- How does Bourdain's book connect Mary Mallon's story to broader social and historical contexts?
- Bourdain uses Mallon's story to illustrate the living conditions and social inequalities in early 20th-century New York, particularly among immigrant communities. He shows how inadequate public health measures and the lack of understanding regarding typhoid carriers contributed to the spread of the disease and the persecution of Mallon.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a sympathetic portrayal of Typhoid Mary, framing her as a victim of circumstance rather than a malicious actor. The author, Anthony Bourdain, clearly takes her side, questioning the actions of Dr. Soper and portraying Mary Mallon as a rebellious figure fighting against unfair treatment. This framing is evident in the rhetorical questions posed to the reader, encouraging them to sympathize with Mallon and view Dr. Soper negatively. For example, the question, "¿No fue a por ella sin tratar de ayudarla?" (Didn't he go after her without trying to help her?), directly influences the reader's perception of Dr. Soper's actions.
Language Bias
The language used is generally descriptive and evocative, but it leans towards portraying Mallon in a positive light and Dr. Soper in a negative one. Words like "recia" (strong), "indomable" (untamable), and "rebelde" (rebellious) are used to describe Mallon, while "patético" (pathetic) and "miserable" are used for Dr. Soper. While the author uses vivid language to create an engaging narrative, the word choices subtly influence the reader's opinion.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a detailed account of Mary Mallon's life and the controversy surrounding her, it might benefit from including perspectives from victims of her typhoid infections or from public health officials who supported the measures taken against her. Including these opposing viewpoints would provide a more balanced perspective on the events and allow readers to form a more nuanced opinion. This omission, however, could be due to the author's focus on Mallon's story and the limitations of space in an article.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the situation, suggesting a false dichotomy between a malevolent Typhoid Mary and a villainous Dr. Soper. It simplifies a complex public health issue into a narrative focused on individual culpability, overlooking the broader context of unsanitary conditions and inadequate public health policies of the time.
Gender Bias
The article focuses primarily on Mary Mallon's strength and resilience, which can be seen as a positive portrayal of a woman in a historical context. However, it doesn't explicitly address gender bias in the broader context of the public health crisis or the societal roles and expectations of women at that time. Further examination of whether similar actions from a male cook would have been treated similarly would strengthen the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses Typhoid Mary, a cook who unknowingly spread typhoid fever, highlighting the negative impact on public health and the importance of food safety and sanitation. The story directly relates to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by illustrating the consequences of poor sanitation and food safety practices on public health. The lack of awareness and the inadequate response to the situation worsened the situation.