nos.nl
UN Ocean Treaty Gains Momentum; Netherlands Delays Ratification
Fifty countries now support a UN treaty to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030, but the Netherlands hasn't yet ratified, despite its prior support and dependence on ocean resources; activation requires 60 countries.
- What are the main causes and consequences of the slow ratification process, focusing on the case of the Netherlands?
- The treaty aims to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030, restricting fishing, shipping, and other activities in protected areas. Currently, only about 8% is protected; research shows that ocean protection leads to ecosystem recovery and wider benefits. People depend on oceans for food, oxygen, carbon storage, transport, recreation, and energy.
- What is the immediate impact of the 50 countries supporting the UN ocean treaty, and what global significance does this hold?
- At the UN Ocean Summit in Nice, 20 countries joined a global treaty to protect the ocean, bringing the total to 50. Ten more countries' ratification will activate this historic treaty. The Netherlands, despite prior support, hasn't yet ratified, though its Infrastructure and Water Management Ministry claims it is working on it.
- What are the long-term implications of the treaty's success or failure for ocean health and human societies, considering the controversies around deep-sea mining?
- While the 60-country threshold wasn't met this week, the expected ratification later this year suggests a rapid diplomatic process, unlike previous ocean treaties which took far longer to activate. Once activated, a dedicated UN summit on ocean protection will be established, mirroring the existing climate summits.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story largely as a success story, highlighting the progress made towards the global ocean treaty. The headline (while not provided) likely emphasizes this positive aspect. The inclusion of quotes from Klaudija Cremers, who views the progress as impressive, further reinforces this positive framing. While the concerns of Ewout van Galen regarding Netherlands' lagging efforts are included, they are presented towards the end of the article, somewhat diminishing their impact compared to the overall optimistic tone.
Language Bias
The article uses largely neutral language. However, phrases like "historisch beschouwde verdrag" (historically considered treaty) and "indrukwekkend resultaat" (impressive result) carry a slightly positive connotation. While these phrases are not inherently biased, they contribute to the overall positive framing of the story. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "significant treaty" and "substantial progress".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the international efforts to protect the ocean, mentioning the UN Ocean Conference in Nice and the progress made towards a global treaty. However, it omits discussion of specific challenges or obstacles faced in achieving the treaty's goals, such as funding issues, political disagreements, or technological limitations. While the article notes the controversy around deep-sea mining, it doesn't delve into the complexities of managing this issue internationally. The lack of detailed information about these challenges could limit the reader's understanding of the complexities involved in ocean protection.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the conflict between economic activities (fishing, shipping, etc.) and ocean conservation. While it acknowledges the need for balance, it doesn't fully explore the nuances of reconciling these competing interests. The framing around deep-sea mining, for example, presents it as a clear-cut issue of potential environmental harm versus economic gain, potentially overlooking the complexities of responsible resource management.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the progress made in the UN Ocean Treaty, aiming to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030. This directly supports SDG 14 (Life Below Water) by promoting the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources. The treaty sets restrictions on fishing, shipping, and other activities within protected areas, contributing to the restoration of marine ecosystems and biodiversity. The fact that 50 countries have already signed the treaty and more are expected to join indicates significant positive progress towards SDG 14 targets.