nrc.nl
US Election 2024: Gender Gap vs. Economy
Analysis of the 2024 US Presidential Election, focusing on the unexpected limited impact of the gender gap and the prominence of economic factors.
Dutch
Netherlands
PoliticsLabour MarketNetherlandsElectionInternational TradeEconomicsGenderSociety
Democratic PartyRepublican PartyForum Voor DemocratiePartij Voor De DierenGroenlinks
Kamala HarrisDonald TrumpThierry BaudetSylvana SimonsBill Clinton
- According to Sylvana Simons, why did Trump appeal more to men?
- Sylvana Simons attributed Trump's appeal to men to a perceived threat to their masculinity from the rise of women and progressive ideals.
- What personal anecdote does the author share regarding the election?
- The author concludes by noting a personal wager on the election outcome, suggesting a belief that voters would prioritize reason and civility, a bet that appears likely to be lost.
- What was the initial expectation regarding the role of the gender gap in the US election?
- The gender gap, while initially predicted to significantly influence the US presidential election, seemed to have less impact than anticipated.
- What is the author's perspective on the potential geopolitical implications of the election?
- The author expresses some hope that Trump's election might bring about movement in stalled international conflicts, despite acknowledging his unpredictability.
- What factor did the author identify as more crucial to the election outcome than the gender gap?
- The author suggests that economic issues, specifically high inflation and its effect on household finances, were more decisive factors in the election outcome than gender.