pda.kp.ru
Venice Faces Complete Submersion by 2150
By 2150, Venice could be completely underwater due to a 3.47-meter sea level rise predicted by the INGV, exacerbated by 7mm annual land subsidence; the existing MOSE flood barrier system is already at its limit.
- What are the immediate implications of Venice's projected submersion by 2150, and how will this affect tourism and the city's infrastructure?
- According to a study by Italy's Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV), Venice and its surroundings could be completely submerged by 2150, with sea levels rising 3.47 meters above the Punta della Salute mark. This is due to both climate change and the city's land subsidence of 7 millimeters annually, causing more frequent floods.
- How do climate change and land subsidence contribute to the increased risk of flooding in Venice, and what is the current capacity of the MOSE system?
- The INGV study projects the loss of 139 to 226 square kilometers of land by 2150, rendering the city uninhabitable and impacting tourism. The existing MOSE flood barrier system, while designed to protect Venice, is already operating at its limit and needs urgent modernization.
- What long-term solutions beyond the modernization of the MOSE system are necessary to mitigate the risk of Venice's submersion, considering the ongoing land subsidence?
- The projected inundation of Venice highlights the urgent need for infrastructure upgrades beyond the current MOSE system. Failure to act swiftly will not only result in the loss of a significant cultural landmark but also severely impact the tourism industry and the lives of Venice's residents. The 7mm annual land subsidence exacerbates the situation, demanding comprehensive solutions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through the lens of impending disaster, emphasizing the potential loss of Venice and its tourist attractions. While presenting factual data, the tone and focus heavily emphasize the negative consequences, potentially overshadowing the ongoing efforts and potential solutions. The headline (if any) would likely reinforce this framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but phrases like "catastrophic development" and "disappear from the map" contribute to a sense of impending doom. More neutral alternatives could include "significant changes" or "substantial inundation".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the potential inundation of Venice due to rising sea levels and ground subsidence, but omits discussion of potential adaptation strategies beyond upgrading the MOSE system. It doesn't explore alternative solutions, such as managed retreat or elevation of buildings, or the economic and social implications of such choices. While acknowledging the existing protests against MOSE, it doesn't delve into the specific environmental concerns or alternative viewpoints regarding flood mitigation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by implying that the only way to avoid the catastrophic flooding of Venice is by upgrading the MOSE system. It doesn't fully explore other potential solutions or adaptation strategies.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the potential submersion of Venice by 2150 due to rising sea levels and land subsidence. This directly relates to the impacts of climate change, threatening coastal communities and ecosystems. The prediction of increased flooding frequency further emphasizes the urgency of climate action.