dw.com
Vietnam Wins 2023 Intervidenie Song Contest
Vietnam's Dyk Fuk won the Intervidenie song contest held in Moscow on September 20th, 2023, with his song "Phù Đổng Thiên Vương", while the US contestant withdrew due to Australian government pressure, and Russia's contestant withdrew himself.
- What were the main results of the 2023 Intervidenie song contest?
- Dyk Fuk from Vietnam won first place with the song "Phù Đổng Thiên Vương". Kyrgyzstan's Nomad trio came in second, and Qatar's Dana Al-Mir placed third. The contest, held in Moscow on September 20th, 2023, saw 22 of 23 countries compete.
- What is the historical context and future of the Intervidenie contest?
- Intervidenie was previously held in the 1960s and 70s under the OIRT, an organization of mostly socialist countries. Its revival was suggested by Vladimir Putin in 2009 and again in 2023, potentially as an alternative to Eurovision, and Saudi Arabia will host the competition in 2026.
- Why did the US contestant withdraw from the competition, and what was the significance of this event?
- The US contestant, Vassy, withdrew due to "unprecedented political pressure" from the Australian government, where she is a citizen. This is significant because it highlights potential political influence on international artistic events and Vassy's known support for LGBTQ+ rights.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a relatively neutral account of the Intervision song contest, focusing on the results and the notable absence of the US contestant. While it mentions the political pressure from the Australian government, it doesn't explicitly endorse or condemn the situation, presenting both the organizers' and Vassy's perspectives. The inclusion of Putin's past proposal to revive Intervision provides context but could be perceived as subtly framing the contest within a geopolitical narrative. However, this is balanced by the focus on the contest itself and the diverse range of participating countries.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. There's no overtly biased or loaded language. Terms like "political pressure" are factual and avoid sensationalism. The description of the winning song as incorporating "elements of hip-hop, pop music, and techno" is objective. The translation of song titles is helpful for a wider audience.
Bias by Omission
The article omits details about the judging process and the specific voting scores. Also, the reasons behind Shaman's withdrawal are presented without much critical analysis. It's unclear whether his claim to be bound by 'the law of hospitality' is a genuine reason or a strategic move. Furthermore, there is no information on the overall audience reception of the event, or its impact beyond the event.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article mentions the absence of the US contestant due to alleged political pressure from the Australian government. This indirectly relates to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) as it highlights potential political interference in cultural events. The withdrawal, while not directly violent, represents a disruption of international collaboration and freedom of expression, which are integral to a peaceful and just society. The event itself aims at fostering international cooperation, but this incident undermines that goal.