bbc.com
With Love, Meghan" Renewed for Second Season Despite Negative Reviews
Meghan Markle's Netflix show, "With Love, Meghan," will return for a second season in the autumn, despite receiving mixed reviews (33% on Rotten Tomatoes) after its Tuesday launch; her new brand, "As Ever," also launched Tuesday.
- How did the Los Angeles wildfires impact the show's release, and what does this reveal about the challenges of production?
- The announcement of a second season comes despite largely negative reviews, with Rotten Tomatoes showing a 33% rating. This suggests that audience reception may differ significantly from critical opinion, or that Netflix sees potential for future success. The show's initial delay due to the Los Angeles wildfires highlights the unpredictable nature of production.
- What is the significance of the announcement of a second season for "With Love, Meghan" given the largely negative critical response?
- Meghan Markle's Netflix show, "With Love, Meghan," has been renewed for a second season, despite mixed reviews from critics. The show, which features Markle sharing lifestyle tips, premiered on Tuesday and filming for season two has already concluded. A new brand, "As Ever," also launched by Markle on Tuesday, will sell products like raspberry spread and flower sprinkles.
- What underlying factors might explain the disparity between critical and potential audience reception of "With Love, Meghan," and what does this suggest about future trends in lifestyle programming?
- The contrasting reactions to the show—positive from some viewers and negative from many critics—indicate a potential polarization of audience tastes and expectations. The decision to proceed with a second season despite poor reviews suggests confidence in the show's potential profitability or a broader Netflix strategy focused on celebrity appeal. The show's themes of escapism and aspiration, noted by the BBC, may resonate with certain viewers.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing is somewhat negative, leading with critical reviews and only mentioning the positive BBC review later. The headline itself could be considered negatively framed, focusing on the announcement of a second series despite mixed reception. The inclusion of details about the show's postponement due to wildfires, while factual, is positioned in a way that might subtly suggest the show's problems extend beyond just negative reviews.
Language Bias
The article uses direct quotes from negative reviews ('gormless lifestyle filler', 'insane', 'exercise in narcissism') without providing sufficient counterpoints immediately. While these are accurate representations of some reviews, their prominence could skew the reader's perception of the show's overall reception. The repeated use of words like 'critical' and 'mixed' also leans towards negativity, although such words are accurate to describe the review situation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on negative reviews of the show, mentioning The Guardian and The Telegraph's criticisms but only briefly referencing a more positive review from the BBC. This omission creates an unbalanced perspective, potentially misleading readers into believing the show was universally panned. The article also omits any discussion of the show's potential audience appeal or its potential to reach a wider demographic beyond those who may be critical of the Sussexes. It does not explore potential reasons for the varied responses to the show.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by emphasizing only the extremely positive and negative reviews, ignoring the possibility of a wide range of opinions in between. This creates a simplified view of critical response, potentially omitting nuanced interpretations.