dw.com
Zelenskyy Revokes Citizenship of Ukrainian Orthodox Church Head Over Alleged Russian Passport
President Zelenskyy revoked the Ukrainian citizenship of Metropolitan Onufriy, head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, on July 2nd, based on the Security Service of Ukraine's (SBU) evidence of his alleged Russian passport obtained in 2002 and his alleged support for the Moscow Patriarchate's pro-Russian stance.
- What are the immediate consequences of revoking Metropolitan Onufriy's Ukrainian citizenship, considering the SBU's evidence and his alleged ties to the Moscow Patriarchate?
- President Zelenskyy revoked the Ukrainian citizenship of Metropolitan Onufriy, head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC MP), due to alleged possession of a Russian passport. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) provided evidence suggesting Onufriy obtained Russian citizenship in 2002 and failed to disclose it, continuing to use his Ukrainian status. This action has sparked heated debates in Ukraine.
- What are the potential international repercussions of revoking Onufriy's citizenship, and how might this action affect the future relationship between the Ukrainian government and the UOC MP?
- The long-term consequences remain uncertain, but this action may escalate tensions between the Ukrainian government and the UOC MP. Legal challenges are expected, and the international response could significantly influence the situation. The incident highlights ongoing efforts to address pro-Russian influence within Ukraine, particularly within religious institutions.
- How does the Ukrainian government's action against Onufriy relate to broader efforts to counter pro-Russian influence within Ukraine's religious institutions and what legal challenges are expected?
- This revocation is rooted in the SBU's findings of Onufriy's alleged Russian passport obtained in 2002 and his alleged continued ties to the Moscow Patriarchate, which openly supports Russia's aggression. The move follows a journalistic investigation revealing several UOC MP officials held Russian passports. While Onufriy denies being a Russian citizen, the SBU alleges he actively opposed the UOC MP's canonical independence from Moscow.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a relatively balanced view, presenting arguments from both sides of the issue. However, the inclusion of quotes from the SBU and the framing of the initial paragraphs might slightly favor the government's perspective. The headline could be made more neutral.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although some terms such as "political instrument of pressure" or "last bell" might be considered slightly loaded. More neutral alternatives could be: 'method of political influence', 'strong warning'.
Bias by Omission
The article presents arguments from both sides – supporters and opponents of the decision to revoke Onufriy's citizenship. However, it could benefit from including perspectives from international law experts specializing in citizenship revocation and religious freedom, as well as opinions from other religious leaders in Ukraine.
Sustainable Development Goals
The revocation of citizenship aims to address potential threats to national security and the integrity of Ukraine's institutions. The action is taken based on allegations of the individual holding a Russian passport and supporting a religious organization linked to the aggressor state. This directly relates to SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies, strong institutions, and accountable governance. The decision, however, raises concerns about potential violations of human rights and due process, which are also central to SDG 16.