Tag #Censorship

Showing 277 to 288 of 1,348 results

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 23, 04:12

Australian Antisemitism Report Sparks Funding, Free Speech Debate

A government-commissioned report details a sharp rise in Australian antisemitism since October 7, 2023, prompting recommendations to restrict funding for cultural institutions perceived as promoting antisemitic views, sparking debate over free speech and the IHRA definition.

Australian Antisemitism Report Sparks Funding, Free Speech Debate

A government-commissioned report details a sharp rise in Australian antisemitism since October 7, 2023, prompting recommendations to restrict funding for cultural institutions perceived as promoting antisemitic views, sparking debate over free speech and the IHRA definition.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the report's findings on Australian arts funding and freedom of expression?

A report commissioned by the Australian government claims a 700% increase in antisemitic incidents since October 7, 2023, leading to calls for stricter regulation of antisemitic content in the arts and cultural sectors. This has prompted concerns about potential censorship and the conflation of criticism of Israel with antisemitism.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 01:10

White House Bans Wall Street Journal Reporter from Scotland Trip After Epstein Story

The White House removed a Wall Street Journal reporter from President Trump's Scotland trip after the Journal published a report alleging a salacious letter from Trump to Jeffrey Epstein; the White House called the report 'fake' and 'defamatory,' prompting a $10 billion lawsuit and condemnation from...

White House Bans Wall Street Journal Reporter from Scotland Trip After Epstein Story

The White House removed a Wall Street Journal reporter from President Trump's Scotland trip after the Journal published a report alleging a salacious letter from Trump to Jeffrey Epstein; the White House called the report 'fake' and 'defamatory,' prompting a $10 billion lawsuit and condemnation from...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this incident relate to broader trends in the Trump administration's relationship with the media?

This incident highlights growing tensions between the Trump administration and the press. The White House's justification for the ban—that the story was false—is contested by the Journal, and the action has drawn condemnation from press freedom advocates. This follows a pattern of the administration restricting press access.

cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 01:10

White House Removes Wall Street Journal From Presidential Press Pool

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool accompanying President Trump to Scotland, citing the publication's reporting on a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein as "fake and defamatory," raising concerns about press freedom and government retaliation.

White House Removes Wall Street Journal From Presidential Press Pool

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool accompanying President Trump to Scotland, citing the publication's reporting on a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein as "fake and defamatory," raising concerns about press freedom and government retaliation.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the White House's decision to remove the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool?

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool for Scotland due to its reporting on a story about President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. This follows a similar incident with the Associated Press, raising concerns about potential First Amendment violations and government retaliation against critical news outlets. The White House cites "fake and defamatory conduct" as justification.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 16:16

Trump Administration Bans Wall Street Journal From White House Press Pool

The Trump administration barred the Wall Street Journal from White House press events after the publication of articles alleging links between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, prompting condemnation from the New York Times and the White House Correspondents' Association as an attack on press freedom.

Trump Administration Bans Wall Street Journal From White House Press Pool

The Trump administration barred the Wall Street Journal from White House press events after the publication of articles alleging links between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, prompting condemnation from the New York Times and the White House Correspondents' Association as an attack on press freedom.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term consequences of the Trump administration's actions on press freedom and public accountability?

The Trump administration's actions will likely continue to escalate tensions between the government and the press, potentially leading to further restrictions on media access and freedom of information. This pattern of silencing critical voices raises concerns about the long-term health of democracy and public accountability. The legal actions against news outlets set a chilling precedent that might deter future investigative journalism.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 07:14

White House Bars WSJ from Scotland Trip After Trump Lawsuit

The White House excluded the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool traveling to Scotland, citing a report detailing a suggestive letter from Trump to Jeffrey Epstein as "fake and defamatory," prompting a $10 billion lawsuit from Trump and concerns about press freedom.

White House Bars WSJ from Scotland Trip After Trump Lawsuit

The White House excluded the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool traveling to Scotland, citing a report detailing a suggestive letter from Trump to Jeffrey Epstein as "fake and defamatory," prompting a $10 billion lawsuit from Trump and concerns about press freedom.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What claims did the WSJ article make, and how did Trump and the WSJ respond to the accusations?

The WSJ article detailed a suggestive 2003 birthday letter from Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, containing allusions to a shared secret and presented within a hand-drawn outline of a naked woman. Trump denies the letter's authenticity, while the WSJ and its owner, Dow Jones, maintain the story's accuracy and will defend against the lawsuit.

fr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 19:15

Russia Tightens Internet Censorship with New Fines and Surveillance Measures

The Russian State Duma passed amendments imposing fines for accessing extremist content online, including via VPNs, and holding internet providers accountable for users' activity, escalating internet censorship and impacting access to information.

Russia Tightens Internet Censorship with New Fines and Surveillance Measures

The Russian State Duma passed amendments imposing fines for accessing extremist content online, including via VPNs, and holding internet providers accountable for users' activity, escalating internet censorship and impacting access to information.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Russia's new internet censorship laws?

The Russian State Duma passed amendments increasing internet surveillance and repression, fining users for seeking extremist material (including via VPNs) and providers for facilitating access to banned sites. These fines range from 3,000 to 500,000 rubles. The law also prohibits sharing SIM cards and passwords.

dw.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 19:15

Russia Passes Law Punishing Searches for Extremist Materials

The Russian State Duma passed a law imposing fines for searching for or accessing materials deemed extremist, even if not explicitly listed, and for improper VPN use, sparking widespread criticism even from pro-government figures and raising concerns about freedom of expression.

Russia Passes Law Punishing Searches for Extremist Materials

The Russian State Duma passed a law imposing fines for searching for or accessing materials deemed extremist, even if not explicitly listed, and for improper VPN use, sparking widespread criticism even from pro-government figures and raising concerns about freedom of expression.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of this law for freedom of information, political dissent, and the future of the internet in Russia?

This law represents a significant escalation in Russia's crackdown on information. It surpasses even Belarus's restrictions, moving beyond punishment for sharing or participation to punishing the mere act of searching for certain materials. This suggests an attempt at total control and a move towards punishing thought itself, with potentially far-reaching consequences for freedom of expression and the digital space in Russia.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 16:15

Russia Criminalizes Online Searches for Extremist Content

Russia's Duma passed a law criminalizing searches for content on its extremist register (5,473 entries), impacting internet users with fines and enabling data collection; protests ensued, with arrests.

Russia Criminalizes Online Searches for Extremist Content

Russia's Duma passed a law criminalizing searches for content on its extremist register (5,473 entries), impacting internet users with fines and enabling data collection; protests ensued, with arrests.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term consequences of this law on Russia's digital landscape and human rights?

The law's vague definition of "extremism" and data collection powers raise serious concerns about human rights and freedom of expression. Future implications include further limitations on online activity and potential escalation of censorship.

t24.com.tr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 10:12

White House Expels WSJ From Presidential Press Pool

The White House expelled the Wall Street Journal from the press pool covering President Trump's Scotland visit after the Journal published an article alleging Trump sent Jeffrey Epstein a birthday letter; the AP's access was also previously blocked for refusing to rename the "Gulf of Mexico".

White House Expels WSJ From Presidential Press Pool

The White House expelled the Wall Street Journal from the press pool covering President Trump's Scotland visit after the Journal published an article alleging Trump sent Jeffrey Epstein a birthday letter; the AP's access was also previously blocked for refusing to rename the "Gulf of Mexico".

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the White House's treatment of the WSJ relate to its prior actions concerning the Associated Press?

The White House's decision to exclude the WSJ and AP reflects a broader pattern of the Trump administration restricting access to journalists deemed critical or uncooperative. Both cases involve disagreements over factual reporting; the WSJ article alleging a compromising letter, and AP's refusal to comply with a renaming request. This demonstrates a potential effort to control the narrative.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 04:11

White House Removes Wall Street Journal From Presidential Press Pool

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool for its reporting on a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, prompting concerns about press freedom and government retaliation against critical media outlets.

White House Removes Wall Street Journal From Presidential Press Pool

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool for its reporting on a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, prompting concerns about press freedom and government retaliation against critical media outlets.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the White House removing the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool?

The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the presidential press pool for Scotland due to its reporting on a story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. This follows a similar incident with the Associated Press, raising concerns about press freedom and potential abuse of power. The White House cited "fake and defamatory conduct" as justification.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 04:11

Wall Street Journal Reporter Barred From Trump's Scotland Trip Press Pool

Following a $10 billion lawsuit from President Trump, the Wall Street Journal was excluded from the press pool covering his Scotland trip, prompting concerns about press freedom. Thirteen other outlets will cover the trip instead.

Wall Street Journal Reporter Barred From Trump's Scotland Trip Press Pool

Following a $10 billion lawsuit from President Trump, the Wall Street Journal was excluded from the press pool covering his Scotland trip, prompting concerns about press freedom. Thirteen other outlets will cover the trip instead.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Wall Street Journal's exclusion from the Scotland trip's press pool?

The White House barred Wall Street Journal reporter Tarini Parti from President Trump's Scotland trip press pool. This follows a $10 billion lawsuit against the Journal for an article alleging Trump sent Jeffrey Epstein a birthday letter with a nude drawing. Thirteen other outlets were selected for the trip.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 22, 19:15

Zimbabwe Seeks to Further Criminalize Government Criticism

Zimbabwean lawmakers are pushing to criminalize criticism of the government, proposing a national ideology and patriotic education, despite a High Court ruling against sections of a similar law and concerns about shrinking democratic space.

Zimbabwe Seeks to Further Criminalize Government Criticism

Zimbabwean lawmakers are pushing to criminalize criticism of the government, proposing a national ideology and patriotic education, despite a High Court ruling against sections of a similar law and concerns about shrinking democratic space.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the proposed legislation connect to broader historical and political patterns in Zimbabwe?

This motion connects to broader patterns of shrinking democratic space in Zimbabwe under President Mnangagwa. The proposed legislation, along with the Patriotic Act, aims to suppress dissent and consolidate ZANU-PF's power, echoing colonial-era laws used to stifle Black majority rule. The government's justification, citing national interest, is contrasted by opposition and human rights activists who argue for the importance of holding the government accountable.

Showing 277 to 288 of 1,348 results