Tag #Court Ruling

Showing 121 to 132 of 264 results

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 15, 01:11

Michigan Judge Strikes Down Abortion Restrictions

A Michigan judge ruled unconstitutional the state's 24-hour waiting period and informed consent rules for abortions, impacting access and sparking debate over reproductive rights.

Michigan Judge Strikes Down Abortion Restrictions

A Michigan judge ruled unconstitutional the state's 24-hour waiting period and informed consent rules for abortions, impacting access and sparking debate over reproductive rights.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do the arguments of those in favor of the ruling differ from the arguments of those opposed?

The decision connects to broader legal challenges against abortion restrictions nationwide. The judge cited increased burdens on patients, including financial and logistical obstacles, as justification. Opponents argue the ruling disregards fetal life and safety.

gr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 13:15

EU Court Rules Against Commission in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Transparency Case

The European Court of Justice ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times, demanding a detailed explanation for the absence of the documents.

EU Court Rules Against Commission in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Transparency Case

The European Court of Justice ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times, demanding a detailed explanation for the absence of the documents.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the European Court of Justice's ruling on the European Commission's handling of transparency requests regarding Pfizer vaccine contracts?

The European Court of Justice ruled that the European Commission failed to adequately justify its inability to provide text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times. The court found the Commission's claim of lacking the documents insufficient, demanding a credible explanation for their absence. This decision stems from a transparency dispute regarding the Pfizer vaccine contracts.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 13:15

EU Court Orders Commission to Release Von der Leyen-Pfizer Texts

The EU General Court ordered the European Commission to re-evaluate its refusal to release text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €35 billion, 1.8 billion-dose COVID-19 vaccine contract from Spring 2021, citing insufficient justification for th...

EU Court Orders Commission to Release Von der Leyen-Pfizer Texts

The EU General Court ordered the European Commission to re-evaluate its refusal to release text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €35 billion, 1.8 billion-dose COVID-19 vaccine contract from Spring 2021, citing insufficient justification for th...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What broader issues of transparency and accountability within the European Commission does this legal case highlight, considering the context of the €35 billion vaccine deal?

This ruling highlights concerns about transparency and accountability within the European Commission's handling of major procurement contracts. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of archiving official communications, particularly those related to significant financial agreements like the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine deal. The Commission's failure to adequately explain the absence of these text messages raises questions about potential information gaps and the need for stricter record-keeping protocols.

kathimerini.gr

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

May 13, 13:15

Attica Land Price Increases Slow After Court Ruling

A Greek court decision invalidating building regulations benefits has slowed the 5.6% annual rise in Attica land prices (Q2 2024-Q2 2025) from 9% the previous year, with expected future price reductions of up to 5% in construction contracts and land sales. Areas like Marousi, Palaio Faliro, and Peri...

Attica Land Price Increases Slow After Court Ruling

A Greek court decision invalidating building regulations benefits has slowed the 5.6% annual rise in Attica land prices (Q2 2024-Q2 2025) from 9% the previous year, with expected future price reductions of up to 5% in construction contracts and land sales. Areas like Marousi, Palaio Faliro, and Peri...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Sustainable Cities and Communities

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the Greek court decision overturning building regulations on land prices in Attica?

The recent court decision cancelling building regulations benefits in Attica, Greece, has slowed the rise in land prices. The market is adjusting, with anticipated reductions in future land prices for both direct purchases and building contracts (antiparoxi) of up to 5%. This decrease is limited by ongoing land scarcity and high demand.

elmundo.es

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 22:15

Ryanair Wins Case: Cabin Baggage Fees Deemed Legal

A Sevilla court upheld Ryanair's right to charge for larger cabin bags, rejecting a passenger's claim and contradicting previous rulings; this decision supports Ryanair's stance against a large government fine but creates legal inconsistencies.

Ryanair Wins Case: Cabin Baggage Fees Deemed Legal

A Sevilla court upheld Ryanair's right to charge for larger cabin bags, rejecting a passenger's claim and contradicting previous rulings; this decision supports Ryanair's stance against a large government fine but creates legal inconsistencies.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Sevilla court's decision regarding Ryanair's baggage fees?

A Spanish court ruled that Ryanair's charges for cabin baggage are legal, rejecting a passenger's claim of improper fees. This decision supports Ryanair's position against the Spanish Ministry of Social Rights, which had previously imposed a large fine. The court differentiated between a small, under-seat bag (free) and a larger cabin bag (chargeable).

elmundo.es

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

May 7, 04:14

Court Orders Rivas Vaciamadrid to Approve 54-Home Building Permit

A Madrid court ordered Rivas Vaciamadrid City Council to grant a building permit to Jarama Desarrollos Inmobiliarios for 54 homes on plot RUL 9, rejecting the council's arguments and ordering it to pay costs, following a 2021 request by the Popular Party.

Court Orders Rivas Vaciamadrid to Approve 54-Home Building Permit

A Madrid court ordered Rivas Vaciamadrid City Council to grant a building permit to Jarama Desarrollos Inmobiliarios for 54 homes on plot RUL 9, rejecting the council's arguments and ordering it to pay costs, following a 2021 request by the Popular Party.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Sustainable Cities and Communities

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the court's decision on housing development in Rivas Vaciamadrid?

The Madrid Administrative Court No. 9 ruled that Rivas Vaciamadrid City Council must grant Jarama Desarrollos Inmobiliarios a building permit for 54 multi-story homes on plot RUL 9. This follows a 2021 request by the Popular Party (PP) for the license. The court rejected the City Council's arguments, ordering it to pay court costs.

kathimerini.gr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 15, 10:12

EU Court Rules Von der Leyen Violated Transparency Rules in Pfizer Vaccine Deal

The European Court of Justice ruled that Ursula von der Leyen violated EU transparency rules by refusing to disclose text messages exchanged with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €1.8 billion COVID-19 vaccine contract in April 2021, raising concerns about potential message deletion and impactin...

EU Court Rules Von der Leyen Violated Transparency Rules in Pfizer Vaccine Deal

The European Court of Justice ruled that Ursula von der Leyen violated EU transparency rules by refusing to disclose text messages exchanged with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €1.8 billion COVID-19 vaccine contract in April 2021, raising concerns about potential message deletion and impactin...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the New York Times' reporting contribute to the court case, and what evidence did it provide regarding the existence of the messages between von der Leyen and Bourla?

The case stems from a lawsuit filed by a New York Times correspondent in Brussels, challenging the Commission's refusal to release April 2021 messages related to a €1.8 billion vaccine deal signed in May 2021. The court deemed the NYT's evidence sufficient, indicating the messages existed and were revealed via NYT interviews with Bourla. The Commission's response, promising further explanation and acknowledging recovery difficulty due to a potential phone replacement, has been met with skepticism.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 13:15

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Bourla Texts on €35 Billion Vaccine Deal

The EU General Court ordered the release of text messages between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding a €35 billion COVID-19 vaccine deal, after deeming the Commission's claim of not possessing them implausible.

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Bourla Texts on €35 Billion Vaccine Deal

The EU General Court ordered the release of text messages between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding a €35 billion COVID-19 vaccine deal, after deeming the Commission's claim of not possessing them implausible.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the EU court's decision on the transparency of EU-Pharma deals?

The European Union's General Court ruled that the European Commission must release text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €35 billion vaccine deal. The court found the Commission's claim of not possessing the messages implausible, deeming their refusal to release them unlawful. This decision is not yet final.

kathimerini.gr

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 14, 10:10

Greece Bypasses Court Rulings on Building Permits with Green Fee Amendment

The Greek Ministry of Environment introduced an amendment bypassing court decisions that nullified building permits utilizing New Building Regulations (NOK) bonuses; projects can proceed by paying a fee for green initiatives, prioritizing developers over citizens concerned about increased constructi...

Greece Bypasses Court Rulings on Building Permits with Green Fee Amendment

The Greek Ministry of Environment introduced an amendment bypassing court decisions that nullified building permits utilizing New Building Regulations (NOK) bonuses; projects can proceed by paying a fee for green initiatives, prioritizing developers over citizens concerned about increased constructi...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Sustainable Cities and Communities

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the amendment address the concerns of citizens potentially negatively affected by increased construction density due to the NOK bonuses?

The amendment aims to alleviate uncertainty created by the Council of State's (CoE) decision, which deemed certain NOK bonus provisions unconstitutional. It prioritizes the interests of developers by allowing projects to proceed, even those facing legal challenges, through a 'green' mitigation fee. This prioritization contrasts with the concerns of citizens affected by increased construction density.

zeit.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 10, 10:12

Judge Halts Trump Administration's Federal Employee Firing Plan

A US judge in San Francisco issued a 14-day temporary restraining order halting the Trump administration's plan to fire thousands of federal employees, citing the plan's secretive nature and lack of Congressional authorization, following a lawsuit from unions and nonprofits.

Judge Halts Trump Administration's Federal Employee Firing Plan

A US judge in San Francisco issued a 14-day temporary restraining order halting the Trump administration's plan to fire thousands of federal employees, citing the plan's secretive nature and lack of Congressional authorization, following a lawsuit from unions and nonprofits.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the judge's decision on the Trump administration's plan to lay off federal employees?

A US judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's plan to fire thousands of federal employees. The order halts the firings for 14 days, pending a review. This follows a lawsuit from unions and nonprofits who argued the plan was implemented secretly and without Congressional authorization.

nrc.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 22:15

EU Court Limits Dutch Asylum Processing Time to Six Months

The European Court of Justice ruled that the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) must decide on asylum applications within six months, rejecting a previous extension to fifteen months due to staff shortages and backlogs, resulting in millions of euros in fines.

EU Court Limits Dutch Asylum Processing Time to Six Months

The European Court of Justice ruled that the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) must decide on asylum applications within six months, rejecting a previous extension to fifteen months due to staff shortages and backlogs, resulting in millions of euros in fines.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the impact of the European Court of Justice's ruling on asylum processing times in the Netherlands?

The European Court of Justice ruled that the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) cannot keep asylum seekers waiting longer than six months for a decision. This decision overturns a previous Dutch government decision to extend the waiting period to fifteen months. The court cited EU regulations requiring asylum applications to be processed as quickly as possible, with a six-month deadline.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 3, 04:09

Harry Loses U.K. Security Appeal, Cites Family Estrangement

Prince Harry lost a court appeal on Friday, July 7, 2023, regarding his U.K. security detail, citing concerns over threats and family estrangement as obstacles to returning to the U.K. with his family.

Harry Loses U.K. Security Appeal, Cites Family Estrangement

Prince Harry lost a court appeal on Friday, July 7, 2023, regarding his U.K. security detail, citing concerns over threats and family estrangement as obstacles to returning to the U.K. with his family.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Prince Harry's failed legal challenge regarding his security detail in the U.K.?

Prince Harry lost his legal battle for security protection in the U.K., stating he feels unsafe bringing his family there due to ongoing threats and media intrusion. He expressed his desire for reconciliation with his family but cited his father's refusal to communicate as a significant obstacle. This follows the 2020 decision to downgrade his security detail after he stepped down as a working royal.

Showing 121 to 132 of 264 results