Tag #Dublin Regulation

Showing 1 to 12 of 33 results

zeit.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 19, 10:18

Germany Increases Deportations to Greece Amidst Falling Refugee Numbers

In the first half of 2025, Germany deported 388 asylum seekers to Greece, exceeding the total for 2024 (220) and prompting criticism due to concerns over conditions in Greece, despite a recent court ruling deeming conditions acceptable for certain groups.

Germany Increases Deportations to Greece Amidst Falling Refugee Numbers

In the first half of 2025, Germany deported 388 asylum seekers to Greece, exceeding the total for 2024 (220) and prompting criticism due to concerns over conditions in Greece, despite a recent court ruling deeming conditions acceptable for certain groups.

Progress

24% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader implications of this policy shift, considering past legal challenges and ongoing diplomatic efforts?

Past legal challenges often favored asylum seekers challenging deportation to Greece due to poor conditions. Despite ongoing, fruitless four-year talks with the Greek government to improve conditions for refugees, Germany is now deporting more asylum seekers, indicating a prioritization of deportations over diplomatic solutions.

taz.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 17, 16:15

German Social Welfare Office Cuts Benefits for Sudanese Refugee, Sparking Legal Battle

A 24-year-old Sudanese refugee in Dessau, Germany, had her social benefits terminated in May 2024 due to the controversial application of § 1 Abs. 4 AsylbLG, despite having two children and lacking necessary documents to return to Italy where she received international protection; this has sparked c...

German Social Welfare Office Cuts Benefits for Sudanese Refugee, Sparking Legal Battle

A 24-year-old Sudanese refugee in Dessau, Germany, had her social benefits terminated in May 2024 due to the controversial application of § 1 Abs. 4 AsylbLG, despite having two children and lacking necessary documents to return to Italy where she received international protection; this has sparked c...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

No Poverty

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences for the Sudanese refugee and her children in Dessau due to the termination of their social benefits and what is the broader significance of this case regarding the application of German asylum law?

A 24-year-old Sudanese refugee in Dessau, Germany, had her social benefits cut in May 2024 by the Dessau social welfare office, despite having two children and having experienced violence and torture during her escape from Sudan via Libya and Italy. She received international protection in Italy but fled due to further sexual assault and currently lacks the necessary documents to return.",A2="This case highlights the controversial application of § 1 Abs. 4 Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz (AsylbLG), which allows the withdrawal of benefits from individuals granted international protection in another Dublin state if their departure is deemed possible. The woman's lawyer argues that her lack of documents renders departure impossible, and the legal status of her children in Italy remains unclear. The Dessau social welfare office cites this law as justification, affecting at least one other family, sparking criticism from the Refugee Council of Saxony-Anhalt.",A3="The ongoing legal battle and similar cases across Germany challenge the interpretation of 'legally and factually' possible departure under AsylbLG. Courts are increasingly overturning benefit cuts in such cases, finding the compatibility with constitutional and EU law questionable, raising concerns about the adequacy of the minimum standard of living. The federal government's insistence that departure is possible if the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) deems it so, despite numerous court rulings to the contrary, points to a continuing tension between administrative practice and legal precedent.",Q1="What are the immediate consequences for the Sudanese refugee and her children in Dessau due to the termination of their social benefits and what is the broader significance of this case regarding the application of German asylum law?",Q2="How does the legal justification for the benefit cuts based on § 1 Abs. 4 Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz (AsylbLG) interact with the refugee's lack of documents and the uncertain legal status of her children, and what role does the Dublin Regulation play in this case?",Q3="What are the long-term implications of the ongoing legal disputes concerning the interpretation of 'legally and factually' possible departure under AsylbLG, both for affected refugees and the future of German asylum policy and its alignment with EU and international human rights standards?",ShortDescription="A 24-year-old Sudanese refugee in Dessau, Germany, had her social benefits terminated in May 2024 due to the controversial application of § 1 Abs. 4 AsylbLG, despite having two children and lacking necessary documents to return to Italy where she received international protection; this has sparked criticism and legal challenges, with courts increasingly questioning the law's compliance with human rights standards.",ShortTitle="German Social Welfare Office Cuts Benefits for Sudanese Refugee, Sparking Legal Battle")) 应为))

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 4, 16:15

Terminally Ill Woman Deported from Germany Under Dublin Regulation

Hayat A., a 61-year-old woman with terminal liver cancer, was deported from Germany to Bulgaria on March 26th, despite her serious illness, due to the Dublin Regulation which determined Bulgaria was responsible for her asylum claim, which Germany rejected in September and October.

Terminally Ill Woman Deported from Germany Under Dublin Regulation

Hayat A., a 61-year-old woman with terminal liver cancer, was deported from Germany to Bulgaria on March 26th, despite her serious illness, due to the Dublin Regulation which determined Bulgaria was responsible for her asylum claim, which Germany rejected in September and October.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

No Poverty

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the immediate consequences of Hayat A.'s deportation from Germany to Bulgaria, given her terminal illness?

On March 25th, 61-year-old Hayat A. was deported from Germany to Bulgaria despite having recently been diagnosed with terminal liver cancer. German authorities, citing the Dublin Regulation, deemed her asylum claim inadmissible, as she initially entered the EU through Bulgaria. Her son, Hasan A., was denied accompanying her to the airport or hospital.

zeit.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 4, 04:14

German Court Blocks Border Asylum Rejections

A Berlin court ruled against Germany's border rejection of asylum seekers without Dublin procedures, prompting the German Lawyers' Association and the SPD to criticize Interior Minister Dobrindt's policy, which was implemented shortly after his appointment and challenges established EU asylum proces...

German Court Blocks Border Asylum Rejections

A Berlin court ruled against Germany's border rejection of asylum seekers without Dublin procedures, prompting the German Lawyers' Association and the SPD to criticize Interior Minister Dobrindt's policy, which was implemented shortly after his appointment and challenges established EU asylum proces...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Berlin court ruling on Germany's asylum policies and border control measures?

The German Lawyers' Association (DAV) urges Interior Minister Dobrindt to halt border rejections of asylum seekers, citing a Berlin court ruling that deemed such rejections unlawful without prior Dublin procedures. The court's decision, impacting three Somalis, highlights the illegality of circumventing established EU asylum processes. This challenges the government's border control strategy.

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jun 3, 19:18

German Border Rejection of Asylum Seekers Ruled Illegal

A Berlin court deemed the German border rejection of three Somali asylum seekers unlawful due to the lack of a clear EU nation responsible for their asylum applications, prompting calls for legal clarity from Brandenburg's Interior Minister René Wilke and highlighting the potential impact on Eisenhü...

German Border Rejection of Asylum Seekers Ruled Illegal

A Berlin court deemed the German border rejection of three Somali asylum seekers unlawful due to the lack of a clear EU nation responsible for their asylum applications, prompting calls for legal clarity from Brandenburg's Interior Minister René Wilke and highlighting the potential impact on Eisenhü...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the court's decision affect the operational status and future role of the Eisenhüttenstadt Dublin center?

The court decision challenges the German government's policy of rejecting asylum seekers at the border, highlighting the conflict between national immigration policies and EU asylum law. The case underscores the need for a clear process to determine which EU member state is responsible for processing asylum applications, particularly within the context of the Dublin Regulation. Minister Wilke's call for legal certainty reflects the uncertainty surrounding the legality of border rejections and the future operations of the Eisenhüttenstadt Dublin center.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 2, 19:17

German Court Rules Border Asylum Rejections Illegal

A German court ruled that the German government's recent policy of turning away asylum seekers at the border without first conducting a Dublin procedure is illegal, citing the case of three Somali individuals denied entry on May 9th after seeking asylum.

German Court Rules Border Asylum Rejections Illegal

A German court ruled that the German government's recent policy of turning away asylum seekers at the border without first conducting a Dublin procedure is illegal, citing the case of three Somali individuals denied entry on May 9th after seeking asylum.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the German court's decision affect Germany's obligations under EU law regarding asylum seekers?

The court's decision highlights the conflict between Germany's new border control policy and its obligations under the Dublin Regulation. The ruling emphasizes the need for Germany to conduct a full Dublin procedure before rejecting asylum applications, regardless of the asylum seekers' entry point into the EU. This case specifically involved three Somali individuals who were denied entry and returned to Poland on May 9th after seeking asylum in Germany.

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 29, 22:20

Iraqi Man Committed to Psychiatric Clinic After Death of 16-Year-Old Girl Near Train Tracks

A 31-year-old Iraqi man has been committed to a psychiatric clinic after being suspected of pushing a 16-year-old girl onto train tracks in Friedland, Germany, on August 11th, resulting in her death; DNA evidence linked him to the crime, and he exhibited prior psychiatric issues.

Iraqi Man Committed to Psychiatric Clinic After Death of 16-Year-Old Girl Near Train Tracks

A 31-year-old Iraqi man has been committed to a psychiatric clinic after being suspected of pushing a 16-year-old girl onto train tracks in Friedland, Germany, on August 11th, resulting in her death; DNA evidence linked him to the crime, and he exhibited prior psychiatric issues.

Progress

20% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What crucial evidence directly connects the suspect to the death of the 16-year-old girl?

DNA traces of the suspect were found on the victim's shoulder. The suspect was also present at the scene shortly before the incident and was reported to police for erratic behavior on the same day. The initial police report classified the death as an accident.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 12, 10:12

German Court Rules Border Rejections of Asylum Seekers Illegal

A German court ruled the government's border rejection of asylum seekers illegal, prompting Justice Minister Hubig to demand Interior Minister Dobrindt justify the practice under EU law, while the government plans to maintain the policy pending a European Court of Justice decision.

German Court Rules Border Rejections of Asylum Seekers Illegal

A German court ruled the government's border rejection of asylum seekers illegal, prompting Justice Minister Hubig to demand Interior Minister Dobrindt justify the practice under EU law, while the government plans to maintain the policy pending a European Court of Justice decision.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the German government justify its border rejection practices, and what are the legal arguments against this approach?

The court's decision supports critics who argue Germany must at least assess which EU member state is responsible for asylum applications, even from safe third countries, as per the Dublin Agreement. The government's reliance on Article 72 as an exception and its pursuit of a European Court of Justice ruling are challenged by the Justice Minister.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 4, 10:10

German Court Halts Stricter Immigration Policy

Germany's new coalition government's stricter immigration policy, involving increased border controls and asylum seeker returns, faces legal challenges after a Berlin court ruled the return of Somali asylum seekers to Poland without applying the Dublin procedure was illegal.

German Court Halts Stricter Immigration Policy

Germany's new coalition government's stricter immigration policy, involving increased border controls and asylum seeker returns, faces legal challenges after a Berlin court ruled the return of Somali asylum seekers to Poland without applying the Dublin procedure was illegal.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Germany's new stricter immigration policies, and how significant are the legal challenges?

Germany's new coalition government, formed in May, is determined to implement its promised stricter immigration and asylum policies. The government, composed of the CDU/CSU and SPD, agreed on measures to limit immigration, including increased border controls and the return of asylum seekers. However, a court ruling halted the return of asylum seekers to Poland, prompting a legal challenge.",

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 3, 04:08

German Court Rules Against Asylum Restrictions, Citing EU Law

A Berlin court mandated Germany to process asylum applications individually, rejecting the government's claim of an emergency and highlighting the precedence of EU law over national policies, potentially affecting thousands of asylum seekers.

German Court Rules Against Asylum Restrictions, Citing EU Law

A Berlin court mandated Germany to process asylum applications individually, rejecting the government's claim of an emergency and highlighting the precedence of EU law over national policies, potentially affecting thousands of asylum seekers.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Berlin court's decision on asylum seekers at the German border?

A Berlin court ruled that Germany must process asylum applications, even if another EU country is deemed responsible, adhering to EU law. This decision counters the government's attempt to circumvent the process due to high asylum applications.

zeit.de

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jun 3, 16:14

Hessen Defends Border Asylum Rejection Despite Court Ruling

Hessen's Interior Minister Roman Poseck supports rejecting asylum seekers at the border despite a court ruling against it, citing the Dublin procedure's failure and the need for strong signals; 728 migrants were deported from January to April 2025, a significant increase compared to 519 during the s...

Hessen Defends Border Asylum Rejection Despite Court Ruling

Hessen's Interior Minister Roman Poseck supports rejecting asylum seekers at the border despite a court ruling against it, citing the Dublin procedure's failure and the need for strong signals; 728 migrants were deported from January to April 2025, a significant increase compared to 519 during the s...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the failure of the Dublin procedure justify the rejection of asylum seekers at the border according to the Hessian Interior Minister?

Poseck cites the failure of the Dublin procedure, which mandates returning asylum seekers to their EU entry country, as justification for employing national law to reject asylum seekers from safe countries. He points to the eventual acceptance of border controls, initially deemed illegal under EU law, as a parallel example, emphasizing the importance of signaling that Germany does not accept asylum seekers who are not persecuted.", A3="Hessen plans to significantly increase deportations, having already deported 728 migrants from January to April 2025, compared to 519 in the same period last year. Poseck acknowledges the need to further examine the possibility of applying the Dublin procedure at the border but believes other EU states' insufficient cooperation will necessitate continued rejections of asylum seekers.", Q1="What are the immediate consequences of the ruling by the Berlin Administrative Court regarding the rejection of asylum seekers at the German border?", Q2="How does the failure of the Dublin procedure justify the rejection of asylum seekers at the border according to the Hessian Interior Minister?", Q3="What are the potential long-term impacts of Hessen's policy of increasing deportations and border rejections on Germany's asylum system and international relations?", ShortDescription="Hessen's Interior Minister Roman Poseck supports rejecting asylum seekers at the border despite a court ruling against it, citing the Dublin procedure's failure and the need for strong signals; 728 migrants were deported from January to April 2025, a significant increase compared to 519 during the same period in 2024.", ShortTitle="Hessen Defends Border Asylum Rejection Despite Court Ruling")) 当然可以!请提供您的要求。我不确定您是什么意思。请您能再说一遍吗?

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jun 2, 19:17

German Court Rules Border Asylum Rejections Illegal

A German administrative court ruled the May 7th border control measure implemented by Interior Minister Dobrindt illegal, citing the deportation of three Somali asylum seekers to Poland without applying the Dublin procedure. The ruling, following the asylum seekers' rejection at Frankfurt Oder train...

German Court Rules Border Asylum Rejections Illegal

A German administrative court ruled the May 7th border control measure implemented by Interior Minister Dobrindt illegal, citing the deportation of three Somali asylum seekers to Poland without applying the Dublin procedure. The ruling, following the asylum seekers' rejection at Frankfurt Oder train...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term implications of this ruling on Germany's asylum policy and its relationship with EU asylum laws?

This ruling sets a precedent, potentially impacting future asylum cases and the government's border control policy. The court rejected the government's claim of an emergency situation justifying suspension of the Dublin Regulation, signaling a significant legal constraint on the government's approach to asylum seekers.

Showing 1 to 12 of 33 results