Tag #Elections

Showing 3,565 to 3,576 of 10,951 results

cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 10:11

Obama and Harris Condemn Trump's Actions, Citing Threats to Democracy

Former Presidents Obama and Harris condemned President Trump's recent actions, including targeting universities and law firms, citing concerns about threats to democracy and individual rights, following a deal between the Trump administration and a major law firm.

Obama and Harris Condemn Trump's Actions, Citing Threats to Democracy

Former Presidents Obama and Harris condemned President Trump's recent actions, including targeting universities and law firms, citing concerns about threats to democracy and individual rights, following a deal between the Trump administration and a major law firm.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the most significant immediate impacts of President Trump's actions on American democracy and institutions?

Former President Obama and Vice President Harris criticized President Trump's actions since his re-election, citing concerns about threats to democratic institutions and individual rights. Obama specifically mentioned the administration's targeting of universities and law firms, while Harris highlighted the chilling effect on organizations and individuals. These criticisms follow Trump's deal with a prominent law firm, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and undue influence.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 13:18

Obama and Harris Condemn Trump's Actions, Warn of Threats to Democracy

Former Presidents Barack Obama and Kamala Harris criticized President Donald Trump's second-term actions, citing White House pressure on universities and law firms as threats to free speech and the legal system, creating fear and silence among organizations.

Obama and Harris Condemn Trump's Actions, Warn of Threats to Democracy

Former Presidents Barack Obama and Kamala Harris criticized President Donald Trump's second-term actions, citing White House pressure on universities and law firms as threats to free speech and the legal system, creating fear and silence among organizations.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do Obama and Harris's remarks connect to broader concerns about the state of democracy in the United States?

Obama and Harris's remarks reveal a pattern of White House intimidation tactics targeting dissent and institutions. Obama cited examples of pressure on universities and law firms, while Harris highlighted the resulting fear and silence among organizations. This illustrates a broader trend of undermining democratic norms and institutions.

theguardian.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 19:17

South Korean Court Ousts President Yoon Suk Yeol

South Korea's Constitutional Court removed President Yoon Suk Yeol from office on Friday for attempting to impose martial law in December, triggering celebrations and setting a 60-day countdown to a new presidential election.

South Korean Court Ousts President Yoon Suk Yeol

South Korea's Constitutional Court removed President Yoon Suk Yeol from office on Friday for attempting to impose martial law in December, triggering celebrations and setting a 60-day countdown to a new presidential election.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did President Yoon Suk Yeol's actions contribute to the political polarization in South Korea, and what role did his rhetoric play?

Yoon's actions were deemed a grave betrayal of public trust and a serious threat to democracy. His attempts to discredit previous elections, use inflammatory rhetoric, and undermine democratic institutions fueled political polarization. The court's ruling aims to restore faith in democratic processes and heal the resulting divisions.

arabic.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:10

Trump Fires National Security Officials at Laura Loomer's Urging

Following a meeting with far-right activist Laura Loomer, President Trump dismissed at least three National Security Council officials, including Brian Walsh, Thomas Podrez, and David Faith, based on Loomer's assessment of their loyalty; this follows a similar incident involving activist Christopher...

Trump Fires National Security Officials at Laura Loomer's Urging

Following a meeting with far-right activist Laura Loomer, President Trump dismissed at least three National Security Council officials, including Brian Walsh, Thomas Podrez, and David Faith, based on Loomer's assessment of their loyalty; this follows a similar incident involving activist Christopher...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the internal review process for staff loyalty contribute to the dismissals?

This event marks the second instance of a far-right activist's influence on National Security Council staff dismissals within the Trump administration, highlighting the growing power of these voices. The firings followed an internal review of staff loyalty, led by Sergio Gor, raising concerns about potential politicization within the national security apparatus. Loomer's direct involvement, despite Trump's denial, underscores the extent of her influence.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:10

States Sue Trump Over Election Order

Nineteen states sued President Trump on Thursday, challenging his executive order that seeks to reshape US elections by imposing stricter voter ID requirements and mail-in ballot deadlines; they argue it's an unconstitutional overreach.

States Sue Trump Over Election Order

Nineteen states sued President Trump on Thursday, challenging his executive order that seeks to reshape US elections by imposing stricter voter ID requirements and mail-in ballot deadlines; they argue it's an unconstitutional overreach.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the lawsuit challenging President Trump's election executive order?

Nineteen states, led by Democratic officials, filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump's executive order aimed at reshaping US elections. The suit argues the order is unconstitutional, infringing on states' rights to manage their own elections and potentially disenfranchising voters. It seeks to block key provisions, including stricter voter ID requirements and mail-in ballot deadlines.

jpost.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:11

Israeli Poll: 60% Fear Civil War Amidst Deep Political Divisions

A JPPI poll reveals that 60% of Israelis fear civil war due to internal disputes and judicial reforms; deep divisions exist regarding the court's authority and the existence of a "deep state.

Israeli Poll: 60% Fear Civil War Amidst Deep Political Divisions

A JPPI poll reveals that 60% of Israelis fear civil war due to internal disputes and judicial reforms; deep divisions exist regarding the court's authority and the existence of a "deep state.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary finding of the JPPI poll concerning the risk of civil war in Israel, and what are its immediate implications?

A new poll reveals that 60% of Israelis fear a civil war, fueled by internal disputes and the government's judicial reforms. This fear is particularly pronounced among those identifying with the left and center, while a significant portion believes Prime Minister Netanyahu's claims of a "deep state" are either wrong or exaggerated.

english.kyodonews.net

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 10:11

South Korean Court Ousts President Yoon, Triggering June Election

South Korea's Constitutional Court ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday, upholding his impeachment due to his December 3rd unconstitutional martial law declaration; a new presidential election is scheduled for June 3rd.

South Korean Court Ousts President Yoon, Triggering June Election

South Korea's Constitutional Court ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday, upholding his impeachment due to his December 3rd unconstitutional martial law declaration; a new presidential election is scheduled for June 3rd.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the immediate consequences of the South Korean Constitutional Court's decision to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol?

South Korea's Constitutional Court unanimously removed President Yoon Suk Yeol from office due to his unconstitutional declaration of martial law on December 3rd. This makes him the second South Korean president impeached, triggering a presidential election within 60 days, expected on June 3rd. The court cited the martial law declaration as a violation of democratic principles.

nrc.nl

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 13:19

South Korean President Ousted After Military Emergency Declaration

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was impeached and removed from office on Friday following a unanimous ruling by the Constitutional Court that he violated democratic principles by declaring a state of military emergency on December 3rd, triggering protests and leading to new elections within 60 ...

South Korean President Ousted After Military Emergency Declaration

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was impeached and removed from office on Friday following a unanimous ruling by the Constitutional Court that he violated democratic principles by declaring a state of military emergency on December 3rd, triggering protests and leading to new elections within 60 ...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the underlying political and social factors contributing to the impeachment and removal of President Yoon Suk-yeol?

Yoon's actions, though initially presented as a response to perceived threats, were later described as symbolic by Yoon himself, aimed at highlighting opposition's obstruction of his policies. This led to widespread protests, both supporting and opposing his actions. The court's decision highlights the fragility of South Korea's democracy and the deep political divisions within the country.",

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 01:18

Canada Imposes Targeted Tariffs in Response to Trump's Auto Levies

Facing US President Donald Trump's auto tariffs, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney imposed targeted retaliatory tariffs, while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to revoke trade agreements if necessary; Stellantis NV paused production and laid off 900 workers due to the tariffs.

Canada Imposes Targeted Tariffs in Response to Trump's Auto Levies

Facing US President Donald Trump's auto tariffs, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney imposed targeted retaliatory tariffs, while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to revoke trade agreements if necessary; Stellantis NV paused production and laid off 900 workers due to the tariffs.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate economic consequences resulted from President Trump's auto tariffs on Canada?

Prime Minister Mark Carney responded to US President Donald Trump's auto tariffs with targeted levies on U.S.-made automobiles, avoiding broader retaliation. This decision immediately impacted Stellantis NV, which paused production at plants in Windsor and Mexico, and laid off 900 workers in six U.S. factories.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:10

Differing Approaches to Canada-U.S. Relations: Carney vs. Poilievre

Canadian Liberal and Conservative leaders, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre, propose contrasting approaches to negotiating a new deal with the U.S., with Carney focusing on managing economic decoupling and Poilievre aiming for deeper integration through increased military spending.

Differing Approaches to Canada-U.S. Relations: Carney vs. Poilievre

Canadian Liberal and Conservative leaders, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre, propose contrasting approaches to negotiating a new deal with the U.S., with Carney focusing on managing economic decoupling and Poilievre aiming for deeper integration through increased military spending.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How realistic is Poilievre's proposal to leverage increased military spending to secure a favorable trade deal with the U.S., considering the current political climate?

Carney's strategy reflects a belief that the long-standing trend of Canada-U.S. economic integration is over, necessitating a new approach to manage the separation. Poilievre, conversely, believes a new deal can achieve closer economic ties with the U.S. by leveraging Canada's military spending.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:10

Lawsuit Challenges Trump's Election Executive Order

Nineteen Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts federal court, challenging President Trump's executive order on elections as unconstitutional, arguing it oversteps presidential authority and violates states' rights to regulate elections.

Lawsuit Challenges Trump's Election Executive Order

Nineteen Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts federal court, challenging President Trump's executive order on elections as unconstitutional, arguing it oversteps presidential authority and violates states' rights to regulate elections.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the executive order impact states' rights concerning election administration?

This lawsuit highlights a significant power struggle between the executive and states regarding election administration. The attorneys general cite the Constitution's elections clause, emphasizing states' authority to set election rules. The challenge underscores concerns about federal overreach and potential voter suppression.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 4, 04:11

Australian Election Candidate Faces Disqualification Over Dual Citizenship

Independent Australian candidate Kate Hulett risks disqualification from the upcoming federal election due to unresolved dual citizenship with the UK, facing a deadline of April 10th to renounce her British citizenship to comply with Section 44 of the Australian constitution.

Australian Election Candidate Faces Disqualification Over Dual Citizenship

Independent Australian candidate Kate Hulett risks disqualification from the upcoming federal election due to unresolved dual citizenship with the UK, facing a deadline of April 10th to renounce her British citizenship to comply with Section 44 of the Australian constitution.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences if Kate Hulett fails to renounce her British citizenship before the April 10th deadline?

Kate Hulett, an independent candidate for the Fremantle federal seat in Australia, faces disqualification from the upcoming election due to unresolved dual citizenship with the UK. She has until April 10th to renounce her British citizenship; otherwise, she'll be barred by Section 44 of the Australian constitution.

Showing 3,565 to 3,576 of 10,951 results