Showing 25 to 36 of 204 results
Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Large-Scale Federal Layoffs
The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to resume large-scale federal worker layoffs, lifting a lower court injunction, despite concerns over impacts to critical government services and legal ambiguities; this affects tens of thousands of employees across multiple agencies.
Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Large-Scale Federal Layoffs
The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to resume large-scale federal worker layoffs, lifting a lower court injunction, despite concerns over impacts to critical government services and legal ambiguities; this affects tens of thousands of employees across multiple agencies.
Progress
44% Bias Score
Supreme Court Backs Trump's Mass Firings in Federal Agencies
The Supreme Court overruled a lower court, allowing President Trump to proceed with mass firings and agency reorganizations without Congressional approval, impacting over a dozen agencies and potentially tens of thousands of employees despite concerns about exceeding executive authority.
Supreme Court Backs Trump's Mass Firings in Federal Agencies
The Supreme Court overruled a lower court, allowing President Trump to proceed with mass firings and agency reorganizations without Congressional approval, impacting over a dozen agencies and potentially tens of thousands of employees despite concerns about exceeding executive authority.
Progress
52% Bias Score
Supreme Court Expands Executive Power, Limiting Judicial Checks
The Supreme Court concluded its term by issuing several rulings that significantly expand executive power, limiting lower court injunctions against presidential orders and following a pattern of decisions favoring the Trump administration's agenda with a 6-3 conservative majority.
Supreme Court Expands Executive Power, Limiting Judicial Checks
The Supreme Court concluded its term by issuing several rulings that significantly expand executive power, limiting lower court injunctions against presidential orders and following a pattern of decisions favoring the Trump administration's agenda with a 6-3 conservative majority.
Progress
64% Bias Score
Supreme Court Curtails Nationwide Injunctions, Expanding Presidential Power
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, Inc., limits nationwide injunctions against executive orders, expanding presidential power and creating a variable legal landscape for citizens' rights depending on location and ongoing litigation; the ruling stems from a lawsuit challenging Trump's...
Supreme Court Curtails Nationwide Injunctions, Expanding Presidential Power
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, Inc., limits nationwide injunctions against executive orders, expanding presidential power and creating a variable legal landscape for citizens' rights depending on location and ongoing litigation; the ruling stems from a lawsuit challenging Trump's...
Progress
68% Bias Score
Supreme Court Limits Judicial Checks on Presidential Power
On June 27th, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, limited the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking presidential actions, a ruling celebrated by President Trump but leaving the constitutionality of his birthright citizenship decree undecided.
Supreme Court Limits Judicial Checks on Presidential Power
On June 27th, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, limited the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking presidential actions, a ruling celebrated by President Trump but leaving the constitutionality of his birthright citizenship decree undecided.
Progress
40% Bias Score
Trump's Emergency Powers: Exceeding Precedents and Threatening Checks and Balances
President Trump invoked emergency powers eight times in his first 100 days, exceeding all modern presidents; this pattern of bypassing Congress for domestic policy raises concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of democratic checks and balances, with implications for future administration...
Trump's Emergency Powers: Exceeding Precedents and Threatening Checks and Balances
President Trump invoked emergency powers eight times in his first 100 days, exceeding all modern presidents; this pattern of bypassing Congress for domestic policy raises concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of democratic checks and balances, with implications for future administration...
Progress
56% Bias Score
Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Proceed with Federal Worker Layoffs
The Supreme Court overturned a lower court's block on President Trump's plan to lay off thousands of federal workers across 22 agencies, enabling the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to proceed with its large-scale government reorganization despite claims that it ove...
Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Proceed with Federal Worker Layoffs
The Supreme Court overturned a lower court's block on President Trump's plan to lay off thousands of federal workers across 22 agencies, enabling the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to proceed with its large-scale government reorganization despite claims that it ove...
Progress
48% Bias Score
Trump Expands Executive Power, Challenging US Democratic Norms
President Trump's numerous executive actions, including military strikes without congressional approval, unilateral tariff imposition, and control over state National Guards, have significantly expanded presidential power, challenging traditional checks and balances and setting new norms for executi...
Trump Expands Executive Power, Challenging US Democratic Norms
President Trump's numerous executive actions, including military strikes without congressional approval, unilateral tariff imposition, and control over state National Guards, have significantly expanded presidential power, challenging traditional checks and balances and setting new norms for executi...
Progress
68% Bias Score
Supreme Court Curbs Nationwide Injunctions, Restoring Balance of Power
The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Casa that nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts to block presidential policies nationwide exceed their authority, impacting the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.
Supreme Court Curbs Nationwide Injunctions, Restoring Balance of Power
The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Casa that nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts to block presidential policies nationwide exceed their authority, impacting the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.
Progress
52% Bias Score
Supreme Court Curtails Judicial Review, Sparking Concerns Over Rule of Law
The Supreme Court handed down rulings limiting lower court power to block executive orders, impacting birthright citizenship, LGBTQ+ education, and online pornography; dissenting opinions expressed deep concern over the decline of American civic society and the expansion of executive power.
Supreme Court Curtails Judicial Review, Sparking Concerns Over Rule of Law
The Supreme Court handed down rulings limiting lower court power to block executive orders, impacting birthright citizenship, LGBTQ+ education, and online pornography; dissenting opinions expressed deep concern over the decline of American civic society and the expansion of executive power.
Progress
56% Bias Score
Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, Shifting Power Balance
The Supreme Court ruled (6-3) that federal judges should apply nationwide injunctions against executive orders narrowly, impacting the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches and potentially increasing presidential power. This ruling stems from a case regarding President Trump's...
Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, Shifting Power Balance
The Supreme Court ruled (6-3) that federal judges should apply nationwide injunctions against executive orders narrowly, impacting the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches and potentially increasing presidential power. This ruling stems from a case regarding President Trump's...
Progress
44% Bias Score
Appeals Court Allows Trump to Maintain Control of California National Guard Troops in Los Angeles
A federal appeals court temporarily halted a lower court ruling that deemed President Trump's federalization of at least 4,000 California National Guard troops and several hundred Marines unlawful, allowing the Trump administration to maintain control of the troops in Los Angeles amidst protests, de...
Appeals Court Allows Trump to Maintain Control of California National Guard Troops in Los Angeles
A federal appeals court temporarily halted a lower court ruling that deemed President Trump's federalization of at least 4,000 California National Guard troops and several hundred Marines unlawful, allowing the Trump administration to maintain control of the troops in Los Angeles amidst protests, de...
Progress
44% Bias Score
Showing 25 to 36 of 204 results