Tag #Fact-Checking

Showing 85 to 96 of 117 results

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 04:08

Meta Eases Hate Speech Rules, Allowing Accusations of Mental Illness Against LGBTQ Individuals

Meta altered its content moderation policies, allowing accusations of mental illness toward LGBTQ individuals based on their identity, alongside replacing its fact-checking program with a community-driven system and removing several hate speech protections.

Meta Eases Hate Speech Rules, Allowing Accusations of Mental Illness Against LGBTQ Individuals

Meta altered its content moderation policies, allowing accusations of mental illness toward LGBTQ individuals based on their identity, alongside replacing its fact-checking program with a community-driven system and removing several hate speech protections.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of Meta's policy changes on online safety and freedom of expression for marginalized groups?

Meta's decision to allow accusations of mental illness against LGBTQ individuals based on their identity may escalate online harassment and discrimination against this group. The replacement of fact-checking with a community-driven system raises concerns about the spread of misinformation and the potential for increased polarization. This coupled with removing previous hate speech protections leaves marginalized groups vulnerable to online abuse.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 13:08

Meta Ends Fact-Checking on US Platforms

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on January 7th that the company is ending independent fact-checking on its platforms in the U.S., citing political bias and aiming to prioritize free speech, mirroring a similar move by Elon Musk's X platform, and potentially impacting the spread of misinformation.

Meta Ends Fact-Checking on US Platforms

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on January 7th that the company is ending independent fact-checking on its platforms in the U.S., citing political bias and aiming to prioritize free speech, mirroring a similar move by Elon Musk's X platform, and potentially impacting the spread of misinformation.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the significance of Meta's decision to end independent fact-checking in the United States?

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on January 7th that the company is ending independent fact-checking on its platforms, starting in the U.S. He claims fact-checking has been too politically biased, eroding more trust than it built. This follows a similar move by Elon Musk's X platform, which Zuckerberg cited as an example.

cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 16:09

Meta scraps fact-checking partnerships, raising misinformation concerns

Meta ended its partnerships with third-party fact-checkers, citing political bias, impacting several organizations and potentially leading to job losses; this decision has been praised by pro-Trump media and supporters, raising concerns about increased misinformation.

Meta scraps fact-checking partnerships, raising misinformation concerns

Meta ended its partnerships with third-party fact-checkers, citing political bias, impacting several organizations and potentially leading to job losses; this decision has been praised by pro-Trump media and supporters, raising concerns about increased misinformation.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Meta's decision reflect broader trends in media and politics regarding fact-checking and its role in combating misinformation?

This move by Meta aligns with a broader trend of questioning the role of fact-checking, particularly among right-wing groups who see it as suppressing their narratives. The elimination of professional fact-checking could increase the spread of misinformation, impacting public discourse and decision-making. Meta's plan to use a community-based system lacks the expertise and ethical standards of professional fact-checkers, potentially leading to inadequate responses to complex misinformation.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 19:08

Meta Eliminates US Fact-Checkers Amidst Disinformation Concerns

Meta scraps US-based fact-checkers, citing bias concerns, prompting a UK-based fact-checking organization, Full Fact, to highlight their rigorous process in combating disinformation on Facebook and X, amidst challenges posed by AI-generated content and the resurgence of old misinformation.

Meta Eliminates US Fact-Checkers Amidst Disinformation Concerns

Meta scraps US-based fact-checkers, citing bias concerns, prompting a UK-based fact-checking organization, Full Fact, to highlight their rigorous process in combating disinformation on Facebook and X, amidst challenges posed by AI-generated content and the resurgence of old misinformation.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of Meta's decision to eliminate US-based fact-checkers on the spread of misinformation?

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, announced it would eliminate US-based fact-checkers, citing concerns of bias and a desire to promote free speech. This decision follows a year-long effort by Full Fact, a UK-based fact-checking organization, to combat disinformation on Meta's platforms, including Facebook and X. Full Fact fact-checkers analyze posts flagged by Meta's systems, investigating claims ranging from manipulated videos to false narratives surrounding global events.

nos.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 22:08

Meta Submits EU Risk Assessment for Content Moderation Changes

On September 6th, Meta submitted a risk assessment to the European Commission, paving the way for potential changes to its content moderation practices in the EU, following similar moves in the US, in accordance with the EU's Digital Services Act.

Meta Submits EU Risk Assessment for Content Moderation Changes

On September 6th, Meta submitted a risk assessment to the European Commission, paving the way for potential changes to its content moderation practices in the EU, following similar moves in the US, in accordance with the EU's Digital Services Act.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Meta's planned shift in content moderation align with the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA)?

Meta's actions are a direct response to the DSA, which holds large tech companies accountable for combating disinformation, hate speech, and election interference. By submitting a risk assessment, Meta is initiating a process that could lead to changes in its content moderation, potentially replacing fact-checkers with a user-feedback system similar to X's Community Notes. This could influence other tech companies operating in the EU.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 7, 16:11

Meta replaces fact-checkers with community notes, risking more misinformation

Meta is eliminating third-party fact-checkers on Facebook and Instagram, replacing them with user-generated "community notes," a move announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg that aims to promote free speech but risks increased spread of misinformation, amid pressure from the incoming Trump administration a...

Meta replaces fact-checkers with community notes, risking more misinformation

Meta is eliminating third-party fact-checkers on Facebook and Instagram, replacing them with user-generated "community notes," a move announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg that aims to promote free speech but risks increased spread of misinformation, amid pressure from the incoming Trump administration a...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

No Poverty

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Meta's decision relate to the incoming Trump administration and broader political pressures, and what other policy changes accompany this shift?

This policy reversal reflects a broader ideological shift within Meta and a desire to improve relations with the incoming Trump administration. Meta's partnerships with fact-checkers were deemed to have created more distrust than trust and led to accusations of censorship of right-wing voices. The company will now focus its automated systems on high-severity violations only.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 04:08

Meta Rolls Back Content Moderation, Ending Fact-Checking Partnerships

Meta announced it will significantly reduce content moderation and end partnerships with 10 third-party fact-checking organizations, citing accusations of political bias and censorship; the decision has drawn mixed reactions, with some expressing concerns about increased misinformation.

Meta Rolls Back Content Moderation, Ending Fact-Checking Partnerships

Meta announced it will significantly reduce content moderation and end partnerships with 10 third-party fact-checking organizations, citing accusations of political bias and censorship; the decision has drawn mixed reactions, with some expressing concerns about increased misinformation.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Meta's decision to end its partnerships with third-party fact-checkers?

Meta, under CEO Mark Zuckerberg, announced it would significantly roll back its content moderation practices, including ending partnerships with third-party fact-checkers. This decision follows accusations of political bias and censorship, with Meta stating it had 'gone too far' in controlling misinformation. The change impacts ten partner organizations, including prominent news agencies and fact-checking groups.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 13:08

Meta Eliminates Fact-Checkers, Shifting to Community Moderation

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the elimination of third-party fact-checkers on the platform, citing excessive censorship and mistakes, and replacing them with community notes; this decision is viewed by some as an attempt to appease President-elect Trump and improve relations after past conflict...

Meta Eliminates Fact-Checkers, Shifting to Community Moderation

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the elimination of third-party fact-checkers on the platform, citing excessive censorship and mistakes, and replacing them with community notes; this decision is viewed by some as an attempt to appease President-elect Trump and improve relations after past conflict...

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Quality Education

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying motivations behind Zuckerberg's decision, and how does it relate to his relationship with President-elect Trump?

This policy change reflects a broader trend of social media platforms prioritizing free speech over fact-checking, potentially impacting the spread of misinformation. Zuckerberg's decision is seen by some as a response to political pressure and a desire to appease President-elect Trump, given Trump's past threats and criticisms. The elimination of fact-checkers may also be influenced by the perception that such initiatives have eroded public trust rather than fostering it.

taz.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 16:09

Meta Ends Fact-Checking, Increases Collaboration with Trump

Meta, owner of Facebook and Instagram, announced it is ending its fact-checking program and will work more closely with Donald Trump, raising concerns about the spread of misinformation and the platforms' ability to moderate harmful content.

Meta Ends Fact-Checking, Increases Collaboration with Trump

Meta, owner of Facebook and Instagram, announced it is ending its fact-checking program and will work more closely with Donald Trump, raising concerns about the spread of misinformation and the platforms' ability to moderate harmful content.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How might Meta's change in policy impact the spread of disinformation on its platforms, and what are the potential consequences?

This change in policy represents a significant shift in Meta's approach to combating misinformation and harmful content. The decision to collaborate more with Trump, known for his past controversial statements, raises concerns about the potential for increased spread of disinformation on the platforms.

nos.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 19:08

Meta Seeks EU Approval for Content Moderation Changes

Meta submitted a risk assessment to the European Commission to adjust content moderation, potentially replacing fact-checkers with a community-based system similar to X's Community Notes, following a similar move in the US; the EU will determine compliance with the Digital Services Act.

Meta Seeks EU Approval for Content Moderation Changes

Meta submitted a risk assessment to the European Commission to adjust content moderation, potentially replacing fact-checkers with a community-based system similar to X's Community Notes, following a similar move in the US; the EU will determine compliance with the Digital Services Act.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate impact will Meta's risk assessment submission have on content moderation policies in the EU?

Meta, the tech giant, submitted a risk assessment to the European Commission, initiating a process to potentially loosen its content moderation practices in the EU, mirroring recent changes in the US. This follows Zuckerberg's announcement to discontinue using fact-checkers in the US and adopt a community-based moderation system.

cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 7, 16:11

Meta Replaces Fact-Checkers with User-Generated Content Moderation

Meta is replacing its third-party fact-checkers on Facebook and Instagram with user-generated "community notes," a change announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg that coincides with President-elect Trump's upcoming inauguration and is expected to allow more harmful content onto the platform.

Meta Replaces Fact-Checkers with User-Generated Content Moderation

Meta is replacing its third-party fact-checkers on Facebook and Instagram with user-generated "community notes," a change announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg that coincides with President-elect Trump's upcoming inauguration and is expected to allow more harmful content onto the platform.

Progress

68% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Meta's decision connect to the incoming administration's views on free speech and the company's recent personnel and financial moves?

This policy change reflects a broader ideological shift within Meta's leadership, coinciding with appointments of Trump allies to the board and a financial contribution to Trump's inauguration fund. The move is directly linked to the incoming administration's stance on free expression, creating a notable contrast to Meta's previous approach to content moderation.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 7, 16:11

Meta replaces fact-checkers with user-generated content moderation

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook and Instagram will replace third-party fact-checkers with user-generated "community notes," a move criticized as political pandering and a potential increase in harmful content, driven by pressure from Republicans and the incoming Trump administration...

Meta replaces fact-checkers with user-generated content moderation

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook and Instagram will replace third-party fact-checkers with user-generated "community notes," a move criticized as political pandering and a potential increase in harmful content, driven by pressure from Republicans and the incoming Trump administration...

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term effects of this policy shift on free speech, online safety, and Meta's role in combating misinformation?

The long-term impact of Meta's decision remains uncertain. While it aims to reduce censorship of non-violating content, it risks increased spread of misinformation and harmful content. The shift to community notes could lead to inconsistent moderation, potentially exacerbating existing problems with online disinformation and the spread of harmful ideologies. The move of content moderation teams to Texas might also impact the diversity of perspectives.

Showing 85 to 96 of 117 results