Tag #International Law

Showing 253 to 264 of 1,026 results

elpais.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 01:14

US Sanctions UN Rapporteur for Gaza Criticism

The UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, faces US sanctions for criticizing Israel's Gaza offensive, prompting an international debate on accountability and the application of international law; a coalition of eight countries, the Hague Group, is seekin...

US Sanctions UN Rapporteur for Gaza Criticism

The UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, faces US sanctions for criticizing Israel's Gaza offensive, prompting an international debate on accountability and the application of international law; a coalition of eight countries, the Hague Group, is seekin...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the US sanctions against Francesca Albanese, and how do they impact international efforts to address the situation in Gaza?

The UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, faces US sanctions for her criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. These sanctions, unprecedented in nature, violate UN conventions on the immunity of officials like Albanese, prompting her to consider legal action while urging states to focus on the situation in Gaza. Dozens of colleagues support her.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strikes, Setting Precedent for Future Cases

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit against the government's role in US drone strikes in Yemen, citing insufficient evidence of German involvement in systematic international law violations; however, the ruling did define a high threshold for future legal challenges.

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strikes, Setting Precedent for Future Cases

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit against the government's role in US drone strikes in Yemen, citing insufficient evidence of German involvement in systematic international law violations; however, the ruling did define a high threshold for future legal challenges.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

Does Germany's provision of logistical support for potentially lethal drone strikes violate its citizens' constitutional right to life, and what are the immediate implications?

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit filed by relatives of two men killed in a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which utilized the Ramstein Air Base. The court ruled that while Germany must uphold fundamental human rights, the specific case lacked sufficient evidence of a systematic violation of international law by the US, deemed a state that considers civilian protection in counter-terrorism.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit regarding the 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, where Ramstein Air Base's infrastructure was used, stating insufficient evidence of systemic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to protect fundamental human rights, l...

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit regarding the 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, where Ramstein Air Base's infrastructure was used, stating insufficient evidence of systemic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to protect fundamental human rights, l...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of this ruling on Germany's foreign policy decisions regarding drone strikes and its relationship with the United States?

This decision sets a precedent for future cases involving foreign operations with German involvement. The court's emphasis on a 'sufficiently clear connection' to German state power and a 'serious risk of systematic violation of international law' suggests a high threshold for legal challenges, while simultaneously offering a framework for future accountability.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 19:14

Ireland Considers Ban on Trade with Israeli Settlements, Facing US Backlash

Ireland's parliament is considering a bill to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, sparking strong criticism from US officials who warn of potential damage to bilateral relations. The bill, if passed, would mark the first such legislation in the EU and has drawn support from...

Ireland Considers Ban on Trade with Israeli Settlements, Facing US Backlash

Ireland's parliament is considering a bill to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, sparking strong criticism from US officials who warn of potential damage to bilateral relations. The bill, if passed, would mark the first such legislation in the EU and has drawn support from...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Ireland passing the bill banning trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank?

The Irish parliament is considering a bill to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a move sharply criticized by US officials. This bill, if passed, would be the first of its kind in the EU, potentially straining relations between Ireland and the US. The Irish Prime Minister has downplayed the bill's significance, stating it is largely symbolic, but opponents see it as further isolating Israel.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 22:11

German Court: No Basic Law Violation in Yemen Drone Strike

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Germany's indirect support of a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which killed civilians, violated the Basic Law's protection of life, determining that insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations existed, although ac...

German Court: No Basic Law Violation in Yemen Drone Strike

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Germany's indirect support of a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which killed civilians, violated the Basic Law's protection of life, determining that insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations existed, although ac...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What conditions did the court establish to determine the extent of German responsibility in cases of foreign military actions resulting in human rights violations?

The ruling highlights the complexities of applying fundamental human rights in contexts of international military operations. The court balanced the protection of human rights with the need for governmental leeway in foreign policy, establishing criteria for future cases: a sufficient link to German state authority and a demonstrable risk of systematic international law violations. This case involved indirect support via Ramstein Air Base, crucial for US drone operations due to geographical limitations.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 16:13

German Court: No Obligation to Halt US Drone Strikes from Ramstein

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming Germany violated international law by allowing US drone operations from Ramstein Air Base, ruling that the necessary conditions for a duty of protection weren't met despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to uphold human rights and inte...

German Court: No Obligation to Halt US Drone Strikes from Ramstein

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming Germany violated international law by allowing US drone operations from Ramstein Air Base, ruling that the necessary conditions for a duty of protection weren't met despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to uphold human rights and inte...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

Does Germany have a legal obligation to prevent US drone strikes launched from Ramstein Air Base, even if those strikes violate international law?

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit by Yemeni citizens claiming Germany violated international law by not preventing US drone strikes from Ramstein Air Base. The court found that while Germany must protect human rights, in this case, the necessary conditions for a specific duty of protection—a sufficient relationship with German state authority and a serious risk of systematic international law violations—were not met.

aljazeera.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 01:13

UN Calls for Suspension of Ties with Israel Amid Gaza Genocide

The UN special rapporteur called for an immediate suspension of all ties with Israel, following Israel's offensive in Gaza which has killed over 58,000 Palestinians since October 2023, while a conference in Bogota discussed diplomatic and judicial measures to pressure Israel to end its attacks.

UN Calls for Suspension of Ties with Israel Amid Gaza Genocide

The UN special rapporteur called for an immediate suspension of all ties with Israel, following Israel's offensive in Gaza which has killed over 58,000 Palestinians since October 2023, while a conference in Bogota discussed diplomatic and judicial measures to pressure Israel to end its attacks.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do historical parallels, such as South Africa's apartheid, inform the current international response to the conflict in Gaza?

A two-day conference in Bogota, co-chaired by Colombia and South Africa, brought together nations to discuss measures against Israel's actions in Gaza. Participants, including members of The Hague Group, focused on diplomatic and judicial measures to pressure Israel to end the attacks, highlighting the systemic nature of the conflict and its impact on international law.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over U.S. Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit concerning the 2012 U.S. drone strike in Yemen, which utilized Ramstein Air Base, ruling that there was insufficient evidence of direct German government involvement in human rights violations, although it affirmed Germany's obligation to protect f...

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over U.S. Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit concerning the 2012 U.S. drone strike in Yemen, which utilized Ramstein Air Base, ruling that there was insufficient evidence of direct German government involvement in human rights violations, although it affirmed Germany's obligation to protect f...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader implications of this case for the use of drone technology in warfare and the legal accountability of states for actions taken abroad?

This ruling sets a precedent for future cases involving allegations of German complicity in extrajudicial killings abroad. The court's emphasis on the need for a demonstrable link between German actions and human rights violations may raise the bar for similar lawsuits. The ruling also underscores the challenges of regulating the use of drones and other advanced technologies in warfare and enforcing international humanitarian law.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 19:14

Ireland's Bill to Ban Trade with Israeli Settlements Sparks US Outrage

Ireland is considering a bill to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, drawing sharp criticism from US officials who warn of damaged relations; the bill, supported by some in Ireland and opposed by others, follows the October 2023 Hamas attacks and the resulting war in Gaza, with over...

Ireland's Bill to Ban Trade with Israeli Settlements Sparks US Outrage

Ireland is considering a bill to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, drawing sharp criticism from US officials who warn of damaged relations; the bill, supported by some in Ireland and opposed by others, follows the October 2023 Hamas attacks and the resulting war in Gaza, with over...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the history of Irish-Palestinian solidarity and the ICJ's ruling on Israeli settlements shape the current debate?

This bill, if passed, would be the first of its kind in the EU, reflecting Ireland's long-standing support for the Palestinian cause and aligning with the ICJ's ruling that Israeli settlement policies violate international law. The US opposition highlights the geopolitical complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the potential for economic sanctions to influence policy. The strong reactions from both sides emphasize the high stakes involved.

elmundo.es

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 04:12

Argentina Wins Temporary Reprieve in YPF Expropriation Case

A New York appeals court temporarily suspended an order requiring Argentina to transfer 51% of YPF shares to Burford and Eton funds, delaying a $17.75 billion payment stemming from the 2012 expropriation of YPF from Repsol. This buys Argentina time to appeal the original ruling.

Argentina Wins Temporary Reprieve in YPF Expropriation Case

A New York appeals court temporarily suspended an order requiring Argentina to transfer 51% of YPF shares to Burford and Eton funds, delaying a $17.75 billion payment stemming from the 2012 expropriation of YPF from Repsol. This buys Argentina time to appeal the original ruling.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying causes of the legal dispute between Argentina and the investment funds, Burford and Eton?

This ruling halts the immediate transfer of YPF shares, pending appeal. The dispute stems from Argentina's 2012 expropriation of YPF from Repsol, with Burford and Eton acquiring the right to sue. Argentina's success in its appeal hinges on avoiding the $17.75 billion payment plus daily interest.

elmundo.es

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 01:14

Argentina Faces Contempt of Court in YPF Share Dispute

A New York judge rejected Argentina's request to delay transferring 51% of YPF shares to investment funds, escalating a legal battle over the 2012 expropriation of the Argentine oil company from Repsol, potentially leading to contempt of court for Argentina if they do not comply within three days.

Argentina Faces Contempt of Court in YPF Share Dispute

A New York judge rejected Argentina's request to delay transferring 51% of YPF shares to investment funds, escalating a legal battle over the 2012 expropriation of the Argentine oil company from Repsol, potentially leading to contempt of court for Argentina if they do not comply within three days.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What factors contributed to the current legal dispute between Argentina and the investment funds?

This ruling stems from a 2023 judgment ordering Argentina to pay $16.1 billion plus interest to Burford and Eton Park Capital for the 2012 expropriation of YPF from Repsol. Argentina's appeal process may lead to the US Supreme Court, while the involved investment funds have expressed willingness to negotiate a reduced payment.",

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 19:14

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over US Drone Strike Using Ramstein Air Base

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit concerning a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen that used Ramstein Air Base, finding insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's human rights obligations and the deaths of civilians.

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over US Drone Strike Using Ramstein Air Base

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit concerning a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen that used Ramstein Air Base, finding insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's human rights obligations and the deaths of civilians.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the court's decision balance Germany's responsibility to protect human rights with its foreign policy interests?

The court's decision hinges on the requirement of a sufficient link to German state authority and a serious risk of systematic violation of international law. In the Yemen case, the court found neither, asserting that the US adequately considered civilian protection in its counter-terrorism efforts. The use of Ramstein Air Base was deemed essential for signal relay due to the earth's curvature, enabling direct drone strikes otherwise impossible.

Showing 253 to 264 of 1,026 results