Tag #Nih Funding

Showing 13 to 24 of 26 results

npr.org

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 13, 10:11

NIH Reviews mRNA Vaccine Research Funding Amidst Concerns of Cuts

The NIH is reviewing funding for mRNA vaccine technology research, potentially cutting funding for at least 130 grants, following the termination of 42 grants studying vaccine hesitancy and research on LGBTQ+ and other vulnerable groups, causing concern among researchers.

NIH Reviews mRNA Vaccine Research Funding Amidst Concerns of Cuts

The NIH is reviewing funding for mRNA vaccine technology research, potentially cutting funding for at least 130 grants, following the termination of 42 grants studying vaccine hesitancy and research on LGBTQ+ and other vulnerable groups, causing concern among researchers.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the NIH's review of mRNA vaccine technology funding?

The NIH is reviewing funding for mRNA vaccine technology research, potentially leading to cuts. This follows the termination of 42 grants studying vaccine hesitancy and research on LGBTQ+ and other vulnerable groups, raising concerns about the impact on public health.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 25, 16:12

NIH Funding Cuts Threaten Children with Rare Cancers

Six-year-old Cailen Vela battles a rare, aggressive cancer that has relapsed, requiring extensive treatment and placing a strain on his family; proposed NIH funding cuts threaten access to advanced therapies for him and other children with similar conditions.

NIH Funding Cuts Threaten Children with Rare Cancers

Six-year-old Cailen Vela battles a rare, aggressive cancer that has relapsed, requiring extensive treatment and placing a strain on his family; proposed NIH funding cuts threaten access to advanced therapies for him and other children with similar conditions.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How will the potential NIH funding cuts directly affect the treatment options and overall prognosis for children with rare cancers like Cailen Vela?

Six-year-old Cailen Vela is battling a rare and aggressive cancer, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, which has relapsed after initial treatment. His parents, Aly and Cody, face significant financial and emotional strain due to the extensive treatment required, including frequent travel and hospital stays. Proposed cuts to NIH research funding threaten the availability of advanced treatments for Cailen and other children with rare cancers.

theguardian.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Feb 20, 22:07

Trump Administration's Actions Cripple NIH Research

The Trump administration's orders have severely disrupted the National Institutes of Health (NIH), delaying research projects, jeopardizing funding, and causing widespread chaos within the agency; impacting advancements in treating numerous diseases and the US's global leadership in health and scien...

Trump Administration's Actions Cripple NIH Research

The Trump administration's orders have severely disrupted the National Institutes of Health (NIH), delaying research projects, jeopardizing funding, and causing widespread chaos within the agency; impacting advancements in treating numerous diseases and the US's global leadership in health and scien...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader systemic implications of these actions for scientific progress and the future of scientific research funding in the US?

The 15% cap on indirect costs poses a significant threat to scientific research. The halting of NIH study sections creates a six-month funding gap, critically impacting smaller labs and potentially hindering future scientific breakthroughs. This could lead to a decline in US scientific leadership and innovation.

nytimes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 14, 13:12

Trump Administration's NIH Grant Cuts Threaten \$5 Billion in Medical Research

The Trump administration's proposed 15 percent cap on indirect costs for NIH grants, totaling at least \$5 billion in cuts, faces legal challenges but threatens to significantly reduce medical research funding across the U.S., particularly affecting universities and hospitals in certain states.

Trump Administration's NIH Grant Cuts Threaten \$5 Billion in Medical Research

The Trump administration's proposed 15 percent cap on indirect costs for NIH grants, totaling at least \$5 billion in cuts, faces legal challenges but threatens to significantly reduce medical research funding across the U.S., particularly affecting universities and hospitals in certain states.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial impacts of the proposed NIH grant reduction on medical research institutions and what specific areas of research are most vulnerable?

The Trump administration's proposed 15 percent cap on indirect costs for NIH grants would slash at least \$5 billion from the nearly \$32 billion budget, disproportionately impacting institutions like universities and hospitals in states such as North Carolina, Missouri, and Pennsylvania. This reduction would force many research organizations to cut back on medical research or seek alternative funding sources.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Feb 11, 01:09

Judge Blocks NIH's Plan to Cut Research Grant Funding

A federal judge temporarily blocked the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from implementing a policy to cap indirect costs for research grants at 15%, following a lawsuit from 22 state attorneys general who argued the policy would cause catastrophic financial consequences for universities and rese...

Judge Blocks NIH's Plan to Cut Research Grant Funding

A federal judge temporarily blocked the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from implementing a policy to cap indirect costs for research grants at 15%, following a lawsuit from 22 state attorneys general who argued the policy would cause catastrophic financial consequences for universities and rese...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the main arguments raised in the lawsuit challenging the NIH's policy change?

The NIH's proposed 15% cap on indirect costs, amounting to a potential $4 billion annual savings, sparked a lawsuit from 22 state attorneys general. They argued the change would severely harm research programs, leading to job losses, program closures, and jeopardizing public health. This legal challenge highlights the significant financial reliance of universities on indirect cost recovery.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 11, 19:17

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Plan to Cut NIH Grants

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's plan to cut National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants by 15% after a lawsuit from 22 states, preventing a potential $4 billion in savings and highlighting concerns about a constitutional crisis amid ongoing legal challenges.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Plan to Cut NIH Grants

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's plan to cut National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants by 15% after a lawsuit from 22 states, preventing a potential $4 billion in savings and highlighting concerns about a constitutional crisis amid ongoing legal challenges.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the administration's attempt to cut NIH funding relate to its broader political and economic agenda?

The Trump administration's attempt to cut NIH grant indirect costs, totaling a potential $4 billion in savings, is connected to broader political and economic goals. The cuts target universities perceived as liberal bastions, coinciding with efforts to extend tax cuts benefiting the wealthy and addressing criticism of the NIH following the COVID-19 pandemic. This action follows a 2017 attempt to slash scientific research funding.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 11, 16:10

Federally Funded Basic Research: Crucial for Pandemic Preparedness

The rapid development of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines, such as remdesivir and mRNA vaccines, resulted from decades of federally funded basic research, primarily conducted by the NIH, which is now threatened by proposed funding cuts.

Federally Funded Basic Research: Crucial for Pandemic Preparedness

The rapid development of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines, such as remdesivir and mRNA vaccines, resulted from decades of federally funded basic research, primarily conducted by the NIH, which is now threatened by proposed funding cuts.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the significance of federally funded basic research in enabling the rapid development of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines?

The rapid development of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines was due to decades of federally funded basic research, not a sudden burst of innovation. Remdesivir, for example, resulted from four decades of coronavirus research focused on understanding the virus's mechanisms, not initially aiming for an antiviral. The mRNA vaccines' success stemmed from research on mRNA's immunological response and pseudouridine, conducted 15 years before the pandemic.

theguardian.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Feb 23, 19:08

Trump Administration Defies Court Order, Halting Billions in NIH Medical Research Funding

The Trump administration blocked NIH grant review meetings, violating a court order and halting billions in medical research funding; this impacts scientists nationwide and delays crucial disease research, defying a judge's order to remove administrative hurdles.

Trump Administration Defies Court Order, Halting Billions in NIH Medical Research Funding

The Trump administration blocked NIH grant review meetings, violating a court order and halting billions in medical research funding; this impacts scientists nationwide and delays crucial disease research, defying a judge's order to remove administrative hurdles.

Progress

24% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the legal ramifications of the Trump administration's actions, and what potential consequences could they face?

This action connects to broader patterns of undermining scientific expertise and potentially delaying advancements in medical research. The delay of study sections, costing an estimated \$1 billion per three days, directly impacts research across numerous diseases. The lack of transparency and last-minute cancellations further exacerbate the issue.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 20, 01:12

HHS Employee Protest Targets Musk's Spending Cuts, Research Losses

Hundreds of current and former federal employees rallied outside the HHS headquarters Wednesday, protesting recent firings and the effect on public health, directing their ire at Elon Musk and his agency's spending cuts; a former NIH scientist reported the loss of her stem cell and blood cancer rese...

HHS Employee Protest Targets Musk's Spending Cuts, Research Losses

Hundreds of current and former federal employees rallied outside the HHS headquarters Wednesday, protesting recent firings and the effect on public health, directing their ire at Elon Musk and his agency's spending cuts; a former NIH scientist reported the loss of her stem cell and blood cancer rese...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying causes of the funding cuts at HHS, and how do they connect to broader political and ideological trends?

The protest highlights concerns about the potential consequences of government spending cuts on crucial scientific research and public health initiatives. The loss of experienced researchers like Ellen Bak, whose work on stem cells and blood cancer has been discontinued, underscores the potential long-term impact on medical advancements. The protest's proximity to the Capitol and the involvement of several lawmakers indicate a broader political battle over government funding and public health priorities.

cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Feb 11, 19:17

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Plan to Cut NIH Funding Nationwide

A federal judge issued a nationwide injunction blocking the Trump administration's plan to cut National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for university research after lawsuits from research institutions and 22 states argued the cuts would devastate crucial public health research and harm patients;...

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Plan to Cut NIH Funding Nationwide

A federal judge issued a nationwide injunction blocking the Trump administration's plan to cut National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for university research after lawsuits from research institutions and 22 states argued the cuts would devastate crucial public health research and harm patients;...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the main arguments raised by research institutions and states in their lawsuits against the NIH funding cuts?

The Trump administration's proposed cuts, which would reduce NIH funding for overhead costs from an average of over 27% to 15%, sparked widespread opposition from the academic and medical communities. Lawsuits highlighted the potential for thousands of lost jobs and the halting of critical research into diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's. The judge's decision reflects the significant concerns raised about the potential impact on public health.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 11, 19:17

Judge Halts Trump's Cap on Research Overhead Costs

A federal judge temporarily blocked a Trump administration directive capping overhead costs for federally funded research at 15%, following lawsuits arguing it violated federal law and congressional intent; a hearing is set for February 21st.

Judge Halts Trump's Cap on Research Overhead Costs

A federal judge temporarily blocked a Trump administration directive capping overhead costs for federally funded research at 15%, following lawsuits arguing it violated federal law and congressional intent; a hearing is set for February 21st.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the lawsuits challenging the Trump administration's directive argue that the new rule violated existing federal law?

The 15% cap, impacting grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), significantly reduced the historically higher indirect cost rates (27-28%, sometimes exceeding 56%). Lawsuits alleged the rule contravened a 2018 law prohibiting unilateral changes to negotiated rates. The judge's order requires affected agencies to report compliance within 24 hours.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Feb 11, 01:09

Senator Collins Opposes NIH Research Funding Cuts

Senator Susan Collins opposed a directive by the NIH to cut university medical research funding, contacting HHS nominee Robert Kennedy Jr., who agreed to review the decision, leading to Collins' support for his nomination; the move prompted a lawsuit from 22 states and widespread criticism from rese...

Senator Collins Opposes NIH Research Funding Cuts

Senator Susan Collins opposed a directive by the NIH to cut university medical research funding, contacting HHS nominee Robert Kennedy Jr., who agreed to review the decision, leading to Collins' support for his nomination; the move prompted a lawsuit from 22 states and widespread criticism from rese...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the NIH's directive to cut university research funding?

Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, publicly opposed a directive from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to cut funding for university medical research. She contacted HHS nominee Robert Kennedy Jr., who promised to review the directive, leading to Collins' support for his nomination. The NIH claims the cuts limit overhead costs, but critics say this will devastate research and jobs.

Showing 13 to 24 of 26 results