Tag #Supreme Court

Showing 205 to 216 of 752 results

cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 12, 16:10

Supreme Court to Rule on Injunctions Blocking Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on May 15th on nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizen parents after February 19th, 2020.

Supreme Court to Rule on Injunctions Blocking Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on May 15th on nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizen parents after February 19th, 2020.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate impact will the Supreme Court's decision on the injunctions have on President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship?

President Trump's executive order restricts birthright citizenship for children born in the US after February 19, 2020, if their father is not a citizen or lawful permanent resident and their mother is unlawfully present or has temporary status. This dramatically alters long-standing US practice.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 11, 22:09

NEU to Challenge Supreme Court Ruling on Transgender Toilet Access in Schools

Britain's largest teaching union, the NEU, will campaign against a Supreme Court ruling defining sex biologically, advocating for trans women's access to women's toilets in schools and potentially providing legal assistance to affected teachers.

NEU to Challenge Supreme Court Ruling on Transgender Toilet Access in Schools

Britain's largest teaching union, the NEU, will campaign against a Supreme Court ruling defining sex biologically, advocating for trans women's access to women's toilets in schools and potentially providing legal assistance to affected teachers.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the NEU's response connect to broader debates about gender identity and legal interpretations of sex?

The NEU's stance reflects a broader conflict between legal interpretations of sex and gender identity. The union's commitment to providing legal assistance and launching political campaigns highlights the potential for increased legal challenges and policy debates surrounding transgender rights in education. The conflict also involves the non-statutory guidance issued by the Tories, leaving many schools to decide locally on transgender bathroom access.

elpais.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 10, 04:12

Appeal Filed Against Dismissal of Tax Fraud Lawsuit Against Spain's Former King

Retired judges and prosecutors appealed the dismissal of their lawsuit against King Juan Carlos I for tax fraud, arguing that the Supreme Court ignored evidence suggesting his tax regularization happened after he knew of the investigation, and are preparing to take the case to Spain's Constitutional...

Appeal Filed Against Dismissal of Tax Fraud Lawsuit Against Spain's Former King

Retired judges and prosecutors appealed the dismissal of their lawsuit against King Juan Carlos I for tax fraud, arguing that the Supreme Court ignored evidence suggesting his tax regularization happened after he knew of the investigation, and are preparing to take the case to Spain's Constitutional...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific evidence do the retired judges claim the Supreme Court ignored in dismissing the lawsuit against King Juan Carlos I?

Retired Spanish Supreme Court judges and anti-corruption prosecutors are appealing the dismissal of their lawsuit against King Juan Carlos I for tax fraud. They argue the Supreme Court failed to consider crucial evidence showing the king's tax regularization occurred after he learned of the investigation, thus not exempting him from prosecution. This appeal is their last resort before the Constitutional Court.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 01:17

UCLA Medical School Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Race-Based Admissions

A class-action lawsuit was filed against UCLA's medical school on Thursday for allegedly maintaining a race-based admissions process despite a 2023 Supreme Court ruling against such practices; the suit cites a significant disparity in acceptance rates between white/Asian applicants and their represe...

UCLA Medical School Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Race-Based Admissions

A class-action lawsuit was filed against UCLA's medical school on Thursday for allegedly maintaining a race-based admissions process despite a 2023 Supreme Court ruling against such practices; the suit cites a significant disparity in acceptance rates between white/Asian applicants and their represe...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term consequences of this lawsuit for other universities and the future of race-conscious admissions policies?

This lawsuit could set a precedent for other institutions facing similar allegations of race-based admissions. A ruling against UCLA could further restrict the use of race as a factor in college admissions, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of other universities' admissions processes and broader implications for diversity initiatives in higher education. The ongoing investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services adds another layer of legal pressure on the university.

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 04:15

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Humanitarian Parole for 530,000 Immigrants

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to terminate the humanitarian parole program protecting 530,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, following a lower court's decision blocking the move due to concerns about due process; the Supreme Court's decision will have...

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Humanitarian Parole for 530,000 Immigrants

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to terminate the humanitarian parole program protecting 530,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, following a lower court's decision blocking the move due to concerns about due process; the Supreme Court's decision will have...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this legal challenge reflect broader conflicts between the executive and judicial branches regarding immigration policy?

This case highlights the ongoing legal battle over immigration policy between the Trump administration and the judiciary. The administration argues that the judge misinterpreted the law and that ending the parole program is crucial for reducing illegal immigration. The judge's ruling, however, emphasizes the importance of due process and individual evaluations.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 22:15

Senate Hearing Grills Homeland Security Secretary on Abrego Garcia Return, Spending, and Agency Restructuring

The Senate Appropriations Committee questioned Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the U.S. following a Supreme Court ruling, DHS spending, and plans for FEMA and CISA; Democrats criticized the administration's actions, while some Republicans raised co...

Senate Hearing Grills Homeland Security Secretary on Abrego Garcia Return, Spending, and Agency Restructuring

The Senate Appropriations Committee questioned Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the U.S. following a Supreme Court ruling, DHS spending, and plans for FEMA and CISA; Democrats criticized the administration's actions, while some Republicans raised co...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do the differing viewpoints on the Department of Homeland Security's spending and immigration policies reflect broader political divisions?

The hearing highlighted a clash over due process, with Democrats arguing that the administration's actions regarding Abrego Garcia and border policies violate legal and ethical standards. Republicans largely supported the administration's approach, while expressing some reservations about dismantling FEMA and focusing on CISA's original goals.

us.cnn.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 11, 16:08

Supreme Court to Rule on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

The Supreme Court will decide whether to temporarily allow President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, impacting families like Mónica's and Meny's who fear their U.S.-born children may become stateless.

Supreme Court to Rule on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

The Supreme Court will decide whether to temporarily allow President Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, impacting families like Mónica's and Meny's who fear their U.S.-born children may become stateless.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

No Poverty

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this case highlight the conflict between the executive branch's authority and judicial review, and what are its potential consequences?

The Supreme Court's decision on the Trump administration's executive order regarding birthright citizenship will determine whether children born in the US to non-citizen parents are granted citizenship. The ruling could create a two-tiered system based on geographic location or individual group affiliations, potentially affecting thousands of children. This challenges the long-standing legal precedent established in US v. Wong Kim Ark.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 10, 19:10

Justice Souter's Unconventional Legacy: A Liberal Voice on a Conservative Court

David Souter, appointed to the Supreme Court in 1990 by President George H.W. Bush, defied expectations by becoming a liberal justice, notably upholding Roe v. Wade in 1992 and later dissenting in Bush v. Gore. His death highlights an era of less politically driven Supreme Court appointments.

Justice Souter's Unconventional Legacy: A Liberal Voice on a Conservative Court

David Souter, appointed to the Supreme Court in 1990 by President George H.W. Bush, defied expectations by becoming a liberal justice, notably upholding Roe v. Wade in 1992 and later dissenting in Bush v. Gore. His death highlights an era of less politically driven Supreme Court appointments.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did Justice Souter's personal approach to his role, including his detachment from Washington's social scene, contribute to his unique judicial legacy?

Souter's judicial philosophy prioritized the court's legitimacy and its role in upholding the nation's values over partisan politics. This independence, exemplified by his Casey vote and his later silence on the matter, directly challenged the increasingly partisan nature of Supreme Court appointments. His actions prompted calls for more thorough vetting of potential nominees, illustrating the impact of his decisions on the political landscape.

nbcnews.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 9, 04:15

Pentagon to Remove Transgender Service Members Following Supreme Court Ruling

The Pentagon will begin removing up to 1,000 transgender service members following a Supreme Court ruling allowing a ban; the Defense Department will also review medical records to identify additional transgender service members for removal. Approximately $52 million has been spent on healthcare for...

Pentagon to Remove Transgender Service Members Following Supreme Court Ruling

The Pentagon will begin removing up to 1,000 transgender service members following a Supreme Court ruling allowing a ban; the Defense Department will also review medical records to identify additional transgender service members for removal. Approximately $52 million has been spent on healthcare for...

Progress

80% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the Supreme Court decision on transgender service members in the US military?

The Pentagon will begin removing up to 1,000 transgender service members from the military, following a Supreme Court ruling allowing a ban on transgender individuals in the military. The Department of Defense will review medical records to identify additional transgender service members for removal. This action affects approximately 0.05% of the 2.1 million total troops.

cnnespanol.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 01:17

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Temporary Protected Status Program

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to end a Biden-era program granting temporary protected status to citizens of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, arguing lower court rulings preventing this action disrupted critical immigration policies; the program affects over 500,000 ind...

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Temporary Protected Status Program

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to end a Biden-era program granting temporary protected status to citizens of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, arguing lower court rulings preventing this action disrupted critical immigration policies; the program affects over 500,000 ind...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term implications of the Supreme Court's decision on this case for future immigration policy and executive power?

This Supreme Court case could significantly impact US immigration policy, potentially setting precedents for future administrations' ability to unilaterally alter existing immigration programs. The outcome will influence the rights and future status of hundreds of thousands of immigrants and shape ongoing debates about executive power regarding immigration. The court's decision on whether the Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to end the program will be crucial.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 22:11

Supreme Court Allows Reinstatement of Transgender Military Ban

The Supreme Court allowed the reinstatement of a ban on transgender service members in the U.S. military, prompting approximately 1,000 service members to face potential separation within 30-60 days, reflecting a broader Pentagon effort to eliminate DEI policies and prioritize military readiness.

Supreme Court Allows Reinstatement of Transgender Military Ban

The Supreme Court allowed the reinstatement of a ban on transgender service members in the U.S. military, prompting approximately 1,000 service members to face potential separation within 30-60 days, reflecting a broader Pentagon effort to eliminate DEI policies and prioritize military readiness.

Progress

72% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying arguments used to justify the reinstatement of the transgender ban?

The Supreme Court's ruling, while not addressing the ban's merits, allows the Department of Defense to enforce policies prioritizing military readiness. This decision reverses a 2014 policy change under President Obama that permitted transgender service members. The Trump administration argued that the transgender policy threatened military readiness and unit cohesion, citing potential costs of approximately $15 million for transgender-related treatments between 2016 and 2021.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 22:15

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Migrant Parole Program

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to end the CHNV program, which provided temporary legal status to 532,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Venezuela, after a lower court blocked the administration's attempt to terminate the program.

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to End Migrant Parole Program

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to end the CHNV program, which provided temporary legal status to 532,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Venezuela, after a lower court blocked the administration's attempt to terminate the program.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Supreme Court's decision on the 532,000 migrants under the CHNV program?

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to terminate the CHNV program, which granted temporary legal status to 532,000 migrants from four countries. A lower court blocked the termination, citing a lack of individual assessment for each migrant. The Supreme Court's decision will impact the legal status and potential deportation of these individuals.

Showing 205 to 216 of 752 results