Tag #Supreme Court

Showing 601 to 612 of 736 results

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 9, 19:11

Alito-Trump Call Raises Ethics Concerns Amidst Trump Sentencing Delay Request

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with Donald Trump on Wednesday, the day before Trump's lawyers requested a delay in his upcoming sentencing hearing for falsifying business records; the call, regarding a job reference for Alito's former law clerk, has raised ethics concerns, especially gi...

Alito-Trump Call Raises Ethics Concerns Amidst Trump Sentencing Delay Request

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with Donald Trump on Wednesday, the day before Trump's lawyers requested a delay in his upcoming sentencing hearing for falsifying business records; the call, regarding a job reference for Alito's former law clerk, has raised ethics concerns, especially gi...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this event relate to broader concerns about ethics and transparency within the US Supreme Court?

The conversation between Justice Alito and Donald Trump highlights concerns about potential conflicts of interest within the Supreme Court. The call, officially regarding a job reference, occurred just before Trump's lawyers sought a sentencing delay, prompting accusations that it was a thinly veiled attempt to influence the court. This incident follows a Supreme Court ruling granting broad presidential immunity, further fueling concerns about the justices' ethical conduct.

apnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 9, 22:10

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions

The New Mexico Supreme Court struck down local abortion restrictions in conservative cities and counties, reinforcing the state's liberal abortion laws and ensuring continued access to abortion procedures, particularly for those from states with restrictive bans, such as Texas.

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions

The New Mexico Supreme Court struck down local abortion restrictions in conservative cities and counties, reinforcing the state's liberal abortion laws and ensuring continued access to abortion procedures, particularly for those from states with restrictive bans, such as Texas.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the New Mexico Supreme Court's decision on abortion access within the state and for those seeking care from other states?

The New Mexico Supreme Court invalidated local abortion restrictions imposed by conservative cities and counties. This decision reinforces New Mexico's status as a haven for abortion access, particularly for individuals from states with restrictive laws, such as Texas. The ruling prevents these local ordinances from interfering with state-level abortion access.

lemonde.fr

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 19:08

Trump Appeals to Supreme Court to Halt Sentencing in Stormy Daniels Case

Donald Trump, ten days from his inauguration, appealed to the Supreme Court to halt his sentencing in the Stormy Daniels hush-money case, arguing presidential immunity, facing a Friday hearing in New York.

Trump Appeals to Supreme Court to Halt Sentencing in Stormy Daniels Case

Donald Trump, ten days from his inauguration, appealed to the Supreme Court to halt his sentencing in the Stormy Daniels hush-money case, arguing presidential immunity, facing a Friday hearing in New York.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of Donald Trump's Supreme Court appeal on his upcoming sentencing?

Ten days before his inauguration, Donald Trump, who was penally convicted for hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, appealed to the predominantly conservative Supreme Court to avoid sentencing scheduled for Friday. His lawyers sought an emergency stay to halt New York state court proceedings, including Friday's sentencing hearing.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 01:10

NC Supreme Court Blocks Certification of Close Election

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 partisan vote, blocked the certification of the Democratic candidate's narrow victory in a state Supreme Court election, halting the official result declaration following a Republican challenge to roughly 60,000 votes.

NC Supreme Court Blocks Certification of Close Election

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 partisan vote, blocked the certification of the Democratic candidate's narrow victory in a state Supreme Court election, halting the official result declaration following a Republican challenge to roughly 60,000 votes.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the North Carolina Supreme Court's order on the state Supreme Court election?

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 partisan vote, issued an order blocking the certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs's narrow victory in a state Supreme Court race. Republican Justice Jefferson Griffin is challenging roughly 60,000 votes, alleging illegal voting. This decision temporarily halts the official declaration of the election results.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 5, 16:09

Supreme Court to Decide TikTok's Fate by January 19th

The Supreme Court will rule on January 10th on a law that could ban TikTok in the US by January 19th if it is not severed from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, impacting 170 million monthly users and potentially causing significant economic consequences for creators and businesses.

Supreme Court to Decide TikTok's Fate by January 19th

The Supreme Court will rule on January 10th on a law that could ban TikTok in the US by January 19th if it is not severed from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, impacting 170 million monthly users and potentially causing significant economic consequences for creators and businesses.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader economic and social implications of the potential ban?

This case highlights the tension between national security concerns and freedom of speech. The government argues TikTok poses a national security risk, while TikTok and its creators contend the ban violates the First Amendment. The economic consequences are significant, with the creator economy potentially losing a substantial portion of its $480 billion projected value by 2027. The outcome will shape the future of social media regulation and the creator economy.

cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 4, 16:07

Trump to Invoke Centuries-Old Laws, Facing Potential Legal Battles

President-elect Trump plans to use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations, potentially the 1807 Insurrection Act for domestic military deployment, and challenge birthright citizenship, despite potential legal challenges based on historical precedent and Supreme Court interpretations.

Trump to Invoke Centuries-Old Laws, Facing Potential Legal Battles

President-elect Trump plans to use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations, potentially the 1807 Insurrection Act for domestic military deployment, and challenge birthright citizenship, despite potential legal challenges based on historical precedent and Supreme Court interpretations.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate legal and practical implications of President-elect Trump's intention to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite deportations?

President-elect Trump plans to utilize several centuries-old laws to advance his agenda, particularly concerning border control and birthright citizenship. He intends to use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations and potentially the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military domestically. These actions may face legal challenges.

jpost.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 9, 19:11

Israel Announces Potential Judicial Compromise

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar and Justice Minister Yariv Levin announced a potential judicial compromise on Thursday, involving concessions from both progressive and conservative sides to address concerns about government overreach and judicial power, impacting Supreme Court appointments and...

Israel Announces Potential Judicial Compromise

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar and Justice Minister Yariv Levin announced a potential judicial compromise on Thursday, involving concessions from both progressive and conservative sides to address concerns about government overreach and judicial power, impacting Supreme Court appointments and...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate changes will this judicial compromise bring to Israel's legal system?

A potential judicial compromise in Israel could end a long-standing battle over the legal establishment. The proposal involves concessions from both sides, including a modified process for appointing Supreme Court justices and limitations on the government's ability to pass Basic Laws.

cnbc.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 16:09

Trump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Halt Hush-Money Case Sentencing

President-elect Donald Trump's lawyers asked the Supreme Court to halt his New York hush-money case sentencing scheduled for Friday, arguing presidential immunity; the court requested a response from New York prosecutors by Thursday.

Trump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Halt Hush-Money Case Sentencing

President-elect Donald Trump's lawyers asked the Supreme Court to halt his New York hush-money case sentencing scheduled for Friday, arguing presidential immunity; the court requested a response from New York prosecutors by Thursday.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of Trump's Supreme Court appeal on his upcoming sentencing?

President-elect Donald Trump petitioned the Supreme Court to halt his New York hush-money case sentencing, scheduled for Friday. The court requested a response from New York prosecutors by Thursday morning. Trump's lawyers cited presidential immunity, arguing the case should be dismissed due to the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity.

apnews.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 8, 22:08

Trump Appeals Hush Money Sentencing to Supreme Court

President-elect Donald Trump is appealing to the Supreme Court to halt his upcoming sentencing in New York for 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election; his lawyers argue the conviction would harm the presiden...

Trump Appeals Hush Money Sentencing to Supreme Court

President-elect Donald Trump is appealing to the Supreme Court to halt his upcoming sentencing in New York for 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election; his lawyers argue the conviction would harm the presiden...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the Supreme Court's previous ruling on presidential immunity relate to Trump's current appeal?

Trump's legal team cites a Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity from prosecutions related to official actions, arguing this should overturn his New York conviction. They contend the New York court lacks authority to proceed until the appeal is resolved. The case stems from a $130,000 hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

roma.repubblica.it

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Jan 6, 16:11

Italian Court Holds Driver Responsible for Unbelted Passenger's Death

The Italian Court of Cassation held the driver, L.D.O., responsible for the death of her passenger, Gianmarco Ruspantini, in a 2015 car accident because Ruspantini wasn't wearing a seatbelt, overturning a previous acquittal and citing articles 589 of the penal code and 172 of the highway code.

Italian Court Holds Driver Responsible for Unbelted Passenger's Death

The Italian Court of Cassation held the driver, L.D.O., responsible for the death of her passenger, Gianmarco Ruspantini, in a 2015 car accident because Ruspantini wasn't wearing a seatbelt, overturning a previous acquittal and citing articles 589 of the penal code and 172 of the highway code.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What potential long-term effects might this ruling have on road safety regulations and driver behavior in Italy?

This ruling sets a significant legal precedent in Italy, clarifying the driver's responsibility for passenger safety. Future cases involving similar circumstances will likely reference this decision, leading to stricter enforcement of seatbelt laws and potentially influencing driver behavior.

nbcnews.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Jan 4, 22:05

DOJ Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump's TikTok Delay Request

The Justice Department opposes President-elect Trump's request to delay a law banning TikTok in the U.S. by January 19, 2025, arguing against a temporary injunction and refuting ByteDance's First Amendment claims; the Supreme Court will hear arguments on January 10.

DOJ Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump's TikTok Delay Request

The Justice Department opposes President-elect Trump's request to delay a law banning TikTok in the U.S. by January 19, 2025, arguing against a temporary injunction and refuting ByteDance's First Amendment claims; the Supreme Court will hear arguments on January 10.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences if the Supreme Court upholds the January 19, 2025 deadline for TikTok's ban or sale?

The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to reject President-elect Trump's request to delay a law banning TikTok in the U.S. by January 19, 2025. Trump's lawyer sought a delay to pursue a political resolution, but the DOJ argued this would require ByteDance to demonstrate a likelihood of winning, which it hasn't. The DOJ also countered ByteDance's First Amendment argument, stating the law doesn't burden any cognizable First Amendment rights.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jan 4, 19:08

Trump to Use Centuries-Old Laws for Immigration Enforcement

President-elect Trump plans to use historical laws, including the 1798 Alien Enemies Act and the 1807 Insurrection Act, to enact stricter immigration policies and potentially challenge birthright citizenship, leading to anticipated legal challenges.

Trump to Use Centuries-Old Laws for Immigration Enforcement

President-elect Trump plans to use historical laws, including the 1798 Alien Enemies Act and the 1807 Insurrection Act, to enact stricter immigration policies and potentially challenge birthright citizenship, leading to anticipated legal challenges.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How might the historical context and previous applications of these laws influence their potential use and legal challenges?

Trump's approach involves invoking laws with controversial past uses, such as the Alien Enemies Act, previously used during WWII to detain Japanese nationals. His aim is to establish a firmer stance on immigration, potentially challenging established legal precedents and Supreme Court interpretations. The potential use of the 1807 Insurrection Act to deploy the military domestically also raises concerns about executive overreach.

Showing 601 to 612 of 736 results