Tag #Transparency

Showing 121 to 132 of 355 results

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 1, 04:12

UK Foreign Aid: Millions Wasted on 'Virtue-Signalling' Projects

A MailOnline investigation reveals that hundreds of UK foreign aid projects are over budget, with some exceeding their original budgets by thousands of percent, raising concerns about the allocation of £15.3bn in taxpayer money towards 'virtue-signalling' projects rather than genuine humanitarian re...

UK Foreign Aid: Millions Wasted on 'Virtue-Signalling' Projects

A MailOnline investigation reveals that hundreds of UK foreign aid projects are over budget, with some exceeding their original budgets by thousands of percent, raising concerns about the allocation of £15.3bn in taxpayer money towards 'virtue-signalling' projects rather than genuine humanitarian re...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

No Poverty

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do the identified overspending issues in the UK's foreign aid budget connect to broader concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the effectiveness of aid projects?

The investigation analyzed £2.1bn of the UK's foreign aid budget, uncovering significant overspending across numerous projects. Examples include a £67m antimicrobial resistance program ballooning to £211.2m and a Malaysian renewable energy grant costing £131,291 despite a £0 budget. These issues raise concerns about the effectiveness and allocation of taxpayer funds.

zeit.de

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 31, 16:15

German Lobbying Spending Reaches €1 Billion in 2024

German interest groups spent over €910 million on federal lobbying in 2024, according to a Bundestag report; this likely underestimates the true amount due to exemptions. New regulations increased reporting requirements, but challenges remain concerning accuracy and enforcement.

German Lobbying Spending Reaches €1 Billion in 2024

German interest groups spent over €910 million on federal lobbying in 2024, according to a Bundestag report; this likely underestimates the true amount due to exemptions. New regulations increased reporting requirements, but challenges remain concerning accuracy and enforcement.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the most frequent lobbying targets, and how do these priorities reflect broader societal concerns and political agendas?

The report reveals that 'economics' was the most frequent lobbying target, followed by 'environment', 'science', and 'European policy'. While the register aims for transparency, exemptions and the exclusion of specific lobbying contacts from reporting create limitations. The high website traffic (21,900 weekly visits, excluding Bundestag access) suggests considerable public interest.

zeit.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 28, 22:10

German Coalition's Potential IFG Revision Sparks Transparency Concerns

A proposal by Germany's CDU/CSU and SPD to potentially revise the Freedom of Information Act (IFG) has sparked controversy, raising concerns about reduced government transparency and hindering investigative journalism, as the IFG previously helped uncover details in the VW emissions scandal and COVI...

German Coalition's Potential IFG Revision Sparks Transparency Concerns

A proposal by Germany's CDU/CSU and SPD to potentially revise the Freedom of Information Act (IFG) has sparked controversy, raising concerns about reduced government transparency and hindering investigative journalism, as the IFG previously helped uncover details in the VW emissions scandal and COVI...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the CDU/CSU and SPD's proposal to potentially revise Germany's Freedom of Information Act, and how might this impact public trust in government?

A proposal by Germany's CDU/CSU and SPD to potentially revise the country's Freedom of Information Act (IFG) has sparked controversy. Critics argue this could hinder transparency and journalistic investigations, citing the IFG's role in uncovering crucial information in past events such as the VW emissions scandal and the COVID-19 pandemic response. The proposal, while not yet finalized, has raised concerns about potential setbacks to democratic accountability.

theguardian.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 28, 22:10

Corporate Hospitality Skews Access to Ministers: Report

A report reveals that businesses receive 23 times more access to ministers than charities in five key departments, raising concerns about potential undue influence from corporate hospitality and advocating for greater transparency and inclusivity in policymaking.

Corporate Hospitality Skews Access to Ministers: Report

A report reveals that businesses receive 23 times more access to ministers than charities in five key departments, raising concerns about potential undue influence from corporate hospitality and advocating for greater transparency and inclusivity in policymaking.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the disproportionate access of businesses to ministers compared to charities and other non-profit organizations impact policymaking?

A report reveals that businesses enjoy significantly more access to ministers than charities or other third-sector organizations. This disparity raises concerns about potential undue influence in policymaking. The report highlights that firms frequently provide hospitality to ministers and officials, creating opportunities for informal influence.

nrc.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 27, 10:11

Dutch Prosecutors' Increased Use of Administrative Fines Raises Judicial Concerns

The Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) implemented a new policy to increase the use of administrative fines ('strafbeschikkingen') for minor crimes, bypassing judges and raising concerns about judicial independence and transparency, prompting a parliamentary discussion on April 8th.

Dutch Prosecutors' Increased Use of Administrative Fines Raises Judicial Concerns

The Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) implemented a new policy to increase the use of administrative fines ('strafbeschikkingen') for minor crimes, bypassing judges and raising concerns about judicial independence and transparency, prompting a parliamentary discussion on April 8th.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term impacts of the increased use of 'strafbeschikkingen' on the transparency, accountability, and public trust in the Dutch justice system?

The increased use of 'strafbeschikkingen' may lead to reduced transparency and public accountability in the Dutch justice system, as these administrative decisions are not subject to the same level of public scrutiny as court proceedings. Future challenges may include maintaining public trust and ensuring equitable application of justice. The long-term impact on judicial independence and public perception of fairness remains to be seen. The April 8th parliamentary discussion with the Minister of Justice will be crucial.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 26, 19:24

Trump Cabinet Members Sued for Using Signal to Discuss Yemen Strikes

A federal lawsuit accuses five Trump administration cabinet members of violating federal law by using the encrypted messaging app Signal to coordinate military strikes in Yemen, prompting the White House to attack the presiding judge.

Trump Cabinet Members Sued for Using Signal to Discuss Yemen Strikes

A federal lawsuit accuses five Trump administration cabinet members of violating federal law by using the encrypted messaging app Signal to coordinate military strikes in Yemen, prompting the White House to attack the presiding judge.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the lawsuit against the five cabinet members for using Signal to discuss military operations?

Five current Trump administration cabinet members are being sued for using Signal to coordinate military strikes in Yemen, violating federal record-preservation laws. The lawsuit, filed by American Oversight, seeks to compel these officials to preserve potentially destroyed records related to national security discussions. Judge James Boasberg, also presiding over a separate case against the administration, is facing intense criticism and calls for impeachment from the White House.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 31, 16:15

Over €910 Million Spent on German Federal Lobbying in 2024

German organizations spent over €910 million on federal lobbying in 2024, a figure that excludes some groups and is likely higher; the Bundestag's Lobby Register, launched in 2022 and expanded in March 2024, aims to increase transparency, but faces challenges.

Over €910 Million Spent on German Federal Lobbying in 2024

German organizations spent over €910 million on federal lobbying in 2024, a figure that excludes some groups and is likely higher; the Bundestag's Lobby Register, launched in 2022 and expanded in March 2024, aims to increase transparency, but faces challenges.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What was the total amount spent on federal lobbying in Germany during 2024, and what are the immediate implications of this spending for policymaking?

German organizations spent over €910 million on federal lobbying in 2024, according to a Bundestag report. This figure excludes some groups like employer organizations and unions, suggesting the actual amount is higher. The report highlights increased transparency since the register's 2022 launch.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 28, 22:10

UK Ministers Accepted Hospitality 3,500 Times in Five Years, Raising Concerns of Undue Influence

A study by Spotlight on Corruption found that UK ministers and officials accepted hospitality over 3,500 times in five years, with firms providing hospitality also securing numerous government meetings, raising concerns about potential undue influence and policy capture.

UK Ministers Accepted Hospitality 3,500 Times in Five Years, Raising Concerns of Undue Influence

A study by Spotlight on Corruption found that UK ministers and officials accepted hospitality over 3,500 times in five years, with firms providing hospitality also securing numerous government meetings, raising concerns about potential undue influence and policy capture.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the total number of hospitality occasions recorded in the study, and what is the most significant concern raised by the findings regarding potential undue influence?

A new study reveals that UK ministers and officials accepted hospitality (lunches, dinners, event tickets) on approximately 3,500 occasions over five years. Firms providing this hospitality also secured numerous government meetings, raising concerns about potential undue influence. The study, by Spotlight on Corruption, analyzed data from five key departments.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 28, 13:15

Court Orders Preservation of US Government Chat on Yemeni Airstrikes

A US court ordered the preservation of messages from a government Signal chat discussing US airstrikes on Yemeni Houthis from March 11-15, contradicting officials' claims of no sensitive information shared, after a journalist accidentally joined the chat and published the transcripts.

Court Orders Preservation of US Government Chat on Yemeni Airstrikes

A US court ordered the preservation of messages from a government Signal chat discussing US airstrikes on Yemeni Houthis from March 11-15, contradicting officials' claims of no sensitive information shared, after a journalist accidentally joined the chat and published the transcripts.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific information revealed in the Signal chat contradicts previous US government statements about the Yemeni airstrikes?

A US court ordered the preservation of messages from a government Signal chat, initially set to auto-delete, that discussed US airstrikes on Yemeni Houthis from March 11-15. The chat, accidentally including a journalist, revealed discussions about the timing of F-18 fighter jets, MQ-9 drones, and Tomahawk missiles, contradicting officials' Senate testimony.

nos.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 27, 16:15

Dutch Ministry of Defence Rediscovers Footage of 2015 Hawija Airstrike

The Dutch Ministry of Defence rediscovered video footage from a June 2015 F-16 airstrike in Hawija, Iraq, which killed at least 70 civilians, ten years after the event and after an investigation by the Sorgdrager Committee which highlighted the missing footage and poor record-keeping within the mini...

Dutch Ministry of Defence Rediscovers Footage of 2015 Hawija Airstrike

The Dutch Ministry of Defence rediscovered video footage from a June 2015 F-16 airstrike in Hawija, Iraq, which killed at least 70 civilians, ten years after the event and after an investigation by the Sorgdrager Committee which highlighted the missing footage and poor record-keeping within the mini...

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the loss and subsequent rediscovery of the video footage impact the Sorgdrager Committee's investigation and its conclusions about the Hawija airstrike?

The rediscovery of the footage follows a Volkskrant investigation into the disappearance of the video. The Sorgdrager Committee, which investigated the attack, previously noted that a crucial video had been overwritten. This discovery further highlights the committee's finding that the Defence Ministry's archives are not in order, despite improvements in recent years.

bbc.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Mar 27, 16:15

Reeves Will Not Accept Free Concert Tickets Again Following Backlash

UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves accepted £600 in free concert tickets, initially defending her actions due to security concerns but later stating she will not accept such gifts again following public criticism; this prompted a debate on ministerial ethics.

Reeves Will Not Accept Free Concert Tickets Again Following Backlash

UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves accepted £600 in free concert tickets, initially defending her actions due to security concerns but later stating she will not accept such gifts again following public criticism; this prompted a debate on ministerial ethics.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this incident reflect broader concerns about transparency and ethics in government?

Reeves's acceptance of the tickets, while adhering to declaration rules, sparked debate within the government regarding the appropriateness of accepting such gifts. This highlights ongoing scrutiny of ministers' conduct and the importance of maintaining public trust. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook voiced his disapproval, contrasting Reeves's actions with his own preference to pay for concert tickets.

sueddeutsche.de

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 25, 22:11

NRW Justice Minister Denies Political Interference in Court Appointment Amidst Controversy

NRW Justice Minister Benjamin Limbach denied political interference in the appointment of the head of the NRW administrative courts, despite a withdrawn cabinet decision and ongoing legal challenges questioning the process due to potential pre-determination and conflicting accounts from candidates a...

NRW Justice Minister Denies Political Interference in Court Appointment Amidst Controversy

NRW Justice Minister Benjamin Limbach denied political interference in the appointment of the head of the NRW administrative courts, despite a withdrawn cabinet decision and ongoing legal challenges questioning the process due to potential pre-determination and conflicting accounts from candidates a...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific procedural irregularities in the appointment process led to legal challenges and the cabinet's withdrawal of its decision?

Limbach's testimony refutes allegations of political interference in the appointment process, emphasizing the selection committee's decision was based on merit, despite acknowledging informal relationships with candidates. However, conflicting accounts and a withdrawn cabinet decision highlight procedural irregularities. The selection process, challenged in court, has been partly overturned by the Federal Constitutional Court due to potential pre-determination.

Showing 121 to 132 of 355 results