Tag #Ursula Von Der Leyen

Showing 145 to 156 of 219 results

kathimerini.gr

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 28, 22:13

Trump Temporarily Suspends EU Tariffs, Seeking Concessions

President Trump temporarily suspended 50% tariffs on EU exports until July 9th, after negotiations with EU Commission President von der Leyen, seeking concessions to avoid permanent tariffs; the EU offered zero tariffs, but further concessions are uncertain.

Trump Temporarily Suspends EU Tariffs, Seeking Concessions

President Trump temporarily suspended 50% tariffs on EU exports until July 9th, after negotiations with EU Commission President von der Leyen, seeking concessions to avoid permanent tariffs; the EU offered zero tariffs, but further concessions are uncertain.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the underlying reasons for President Trump's negotiating strategy with the EU, and how do these factors influence the current trade dispute?

President Trump's decision to temporarily suspend tariffs highlights his negotiating tactic of using threats and demanding preemptive concessions. The EU's response has been to offer zero tariffs, but it remains uncertain what additional concessions will satisfy President Trump, who is dissatisfied with the EU's slow pace and bureaucratic approach.

cnnespanol.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 26, 07:11

Trump Postpones EU Tariffs Until July 9th for Trade Negotiations

President Trump postponed 50% tariffs on the European Union until July 9th following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, creating a window for negotiation to resolve a $236 billion US trade deficit with the EU in 2022. This follows a previous implementation of a rec...

Trump Postpones EU Tariffs Until July 9th for Trade Negotiations

President Trump postponed 50% tariffs on the European Union until July 9th following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, creating a window for negotiation to resolve a $236 billion US trade deficit with the EU in 2022. This follows a previous implementation of a rec...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of President Trump's decision to postpone the EU tariffs until July 9th?

President Trump announced a delay of EU tariffs until July 9th following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who proposed resuming negotiations. The tariffs, initially set for June 1st, were to be 50% but had already included a reciprocal 20% tariff implemented in April. This postponement allows time for discussions aimed at reaching a trade agreement.

es.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 26, 13:10

Trump Delays EU Tariffs Until July 9th, Markets Surge

President Trump delayed imposing a 50% tariff on European Union imports until July 9th after a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, causing a surge in US and anticipated European stock futures; this follows previous tariff threats and a new EU trade proposal.

Trump Delays EU Tariffs Until July 9th, Markets Surge

President Trump delayed imposing a 50% tariff on European Union imports until July 9th after a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, causing a surge in US and anticipated European stock futures; this follows previous tariff threats and a new EU trade proposal.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of President Trump's decision to postpone the 50% tariff on EU imports?

President Trump announced a delay in imposing a 50% tariff on EU imports until July 9th, following a call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. This postponement caused a significant rise in US stock futures and is expected to boost European markets. The decision comes after Trump initially threatened tariffs in April, then reduced them, and finally threatened the 50% increase in June.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 15, 01:11

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Pfizer Text Messages

The General Court of the European Union annulled the European Commission's 2022 decision to block the release of text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, exchanged between January 2021 and May 2022 during the negotiation of multi-billion euro COVI...

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Pfizer Text Messages

The General Court of the European Union annulled the European Commission's 2022 decision to block the release of text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, exchanged between January 2021 and May 2022 during the negotiation of multi-billion euro COVI...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the European Commission justify its refusal to release the text messages, and why did the GCUE reject these justifications?

The GCUE's decision highlights concerns about transparency within the European Commission, particularly regarding the negotiation of multi-billion euro vaccine contracts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court's rejection of the Commission's claim of lacking the requested documents underscores the importance of accountability in public decision-making. The case, dubbed "Pfizergate", involved allegations of excessive vaccine pricing and opaque decision-making processes.

nrc.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 01:10

EU Court Rules on "Pfizergate," Impacting Transparency and Accountability

The European Court of Justice ruled on the "Pfizergate" controversy, focusing on the possible deletion of text messages between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €1.8 billion vaccine contract signed in 2021, raising questions about EU transparency...

EU Court Rules on "Pfizergate," Impacting Transparency and Accountability

The European Court of Justice ruled on the "Pfizergate" controversy, focusing on the possible deletion of text messages between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla concerning a €1.8 billion vaccine contract signed in 2021, raising questions about EU transparency...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the implications of the European Court of Justice's ruling in the "Pfizergate" case for EU transparency and accountability?

The European Court of Justice ruled on the "Pfizergate" case, concerning the deletion of text messages between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding a €1.8 billion vaccine contract. The court's decision impacts EU transparency rules and the accessibility of official communications. Von der Leyen's actions have raised questions about accountability and the archiving of digital communications within the EU.

politico.eu

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 19:13

EU Top Legal Advisor Transferred After Transparency Ruling

Hours after a court ruled against the European Commission for withholding text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer's CEO concerning Covid-19 vaccine procurement, the Commission transferred its top legal advisor, Daniel Calleja y Crespo, to head its Spanish representation, prom...

EU Top Legal Advisor Transferred After Transparency Ruling

Hours after a court ruled against the European Commission for withholding text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer's CEO concerning Covid-19 vaccine procurement, the Commission transferred its top legal advisor, Daniel Calleja y Crespo, to head its Spanish representation, prom...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the direct impact of the court ruling on the European Commission's transparency practices?

The European Commission transferred its top legal adviser, Daniel Calleja y Crespo, to head its Spanish representation. This occurred hours after a court ruled the Commission violated transparency standards by withholding Pfizer CEO-Ursula von der Leyen Covid-19 vaccine text messages. The Commission insists the actions are unrelated.

lexpress.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 27, 16:11

Trump Delays EU Tariffs, Opening Door for Trade Negotiations

Donald Trump delayed imposing 50% tariffs on the EU until July 9th, creating an opportunity for negotiations to avoid a trade war; the US seeks to reduce its trade deficit, while the EU aims to protect its economy and avoid retaliatory tariffs.

Trump Delays EU Tariffs, Opening Door for Trade Negotiations

Donald Trump delayed imposing 50% tariffs on the EU until July 9th, creating an opportunity for negotiations to avoid a trade war; the US seeks to reduce its trade deficit, while the EU aims to protect its economy and avoid retaliatory tariffs.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the core demands of each side, and what are the potential compromises?

The US seeks to eliminate its trade deficit with the EU, pushing for increased US LNG imports and removal of EU regulations. The EU, facing economic stagnation, counters with a proposal for reciprocal zero tariffs on industrial goods, but Trump deemed it insufficient. The EU has threatened retaliatory tariffs on $136 billion of US goods if negotiations fail.

gr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 26, 13:10

Trump Postpones EU Tariffs Until July 9th

President Trump postponed 50% tariffs on EU imports until July 9, 2025, following a phone call with Ursula von der Leyen; this decision caused a significant rebound in US stock futures and is anticipated to positively affect European markets on Monday, despite ongoing trade disagreements and a subst...

Trump Postpones EU Tariffs Until July 9th

President Trump postponed 50% tariffs on EU imports until July 9, 2025, following a phone call with Ursula von der Leyen; this decision caused a significant rebound in US stock futures and is anticipated to positively affect European markets on Monday, despite ongoing trade disagreements and a subst...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What factors contributed to the initial threat of 50% tariffs, and what role did the EU's response play?

This decision follows a pattern of escalating trade tensions between the US and the EU, marked by initial tariff announcements, subsequent reductions, and renewed threats. The delay suggests a temporary easing of tensions, potentially linked to ongoing negotiations and a revised trade proposal submitted by the EU. Market reactions reflect investor sentiment toward the likelihood of further trade disputes.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 26, 16:11

Trump Delays EU Tariffs After Phone Call

Following a phone call between President Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on July 1, 2024, the US suspended its threat of 50% tariffs on EU imports originally scheduled for June 1, 2024, giving renewed impetus to ongoing trade negotiations with a new deadline of July 9, 2024.

Trump Delays EU Tariffs After Phone Call

Following a phone call between President Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on July 1, 2024, the US suspended its threat of 50% tariffs on EU imports originally scheduled for June 1, 2024, giving renewed impetus to ongoing trade negotiations with a new deadline of July 9, 2024.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the main sticking points in the US-EU trade negotiations before the phone call?

The phone call between President Trump and von der Leyen initiated a fast track of trade negotiations, with both parties agreeing to stay in close contact. This follows Trump's Friday announcement of potential 50% tariffs, which caused significant market volatility. The July 9 deadline for a trade deal remains in place.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 15, 22:14

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Pfizer Texts

The EU General Court ordered the European Commission to release text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding a €35 billion COVID-19 vaccine contract, following a lawsuit by the New York Times, due to the Commission's insufficient efforts to locate the r...

EU Court Orders Release of Von der Leyen-Pfizer Texts

The EU General Court ordered the European Commission to release text messages between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding a €35 billion COVID-19 vaccine contract, following a lawsuit by the New York Times, due to the Commission's insufficient efforts to locate the r...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the European Commission's handling of the initial request for the text messages contribute to the court's decision?

The court found the Commission's claim of lacking the requested documents unconvincing, citing insufficient efforts to locate or retain them. This decision stems from a 2021 New York Times journalist's request under EU transparency laws, highlighting concerns over opaque decision-making during the pandemic.

gr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 13:15

EU Court Rules Against Commission in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Transparency Case

The European Court of Justice ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times, demanding a detailed explanation for the absence of the documents.

EU Court Rules Against Commission in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Transparency Case

The European Court of Justice ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times, demanding a detailed explanation for the absence of the documents.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the European Court of Justice's ruling on the European Commission's handling of transparency requests regarding Pfizer vaccine contracts?

The European Court of Justice ruled that the European Commission failed to adequately justify its inability to provide text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding COVID-19 vaccine contracts, as requested by The New York Times. The court found the Commission's claim of lacking the documents insufficient, demanding a credible explanation for their absence. This decision stems from a transparency dispute regarding the Pfizer vaccine contracts.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 14, 22:10

EU Court Rules Against Commission for Lack of Transparency in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Documents

The EU General Court ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide sufficient justification for not possessing text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in pu...

EU Court Rules Against Commission for Lack of Transparency in Pfizer Vaccine Contract Documents

The EU General Court ruled against the European Commission for failing to provide sufficient justification for not possessing text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Bourla concerning COVID-19 vaccine contracts, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in pu...

Progress

20% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this ruling relate to broader concerns about transparency and accountability in EU decision-making processes?

The ruling reinforces the importance of transparency and accountability in public institutions, particularly concerning decisions with significant public health implications. The court's decision connects to broader concerns about the influence of commercial interests on public policy and the need for greater scrutiny of government actions. The case underscores the limitations of claiming document non-existence without credible explanation.

Showing 145 to 156 of 219 results