Tag #Us Supreme Court

Showing 1 to 12 of 69 results

bbc.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Sep 23, 04:17

Supreme Court Rules President Can Dismiss FTC Official

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump can dismiss Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, potentially impacting the independence of independent agencies.

Supreme Court Rules President Can Dismiss FTC Official

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump can dismiss Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, potentially impacting the independence of independent agencies.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the historical context and legal precedent affected by this ruling?

The ruling challenges the 1935 Humphrey's Executor precedent, which shielded independent agencies from presidential interference, allowing removal only for cause. The court will revisit this precedent in December, potentially altering the structure and function of numerous independent agencies.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 21, 16:19

US Supreme Court Actions and Potential Constitutional Crisis

In June 2024, the US Supreme Court's decision shielded Donald Trump from prosecution, prompting concerns about a potential constitutional crisis as Trump asserts expanded presidential powers while Justice Barrett expresses uncertainty about the situation.

US Supreme Court Actions and Potential Constitutional Crisis

In June 2024, the US Supreme Court's decision shielded Donald Trump from prosecution, prompting concerns about a potential constitutional crisis as Trump asserts expanded presidential powers while Justice Barrett expresses uncertainty about the situation.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What was the main impact of the Supreme Court's June 2024 decision on Donald Trump, and what are the immediate implications?

The Supreme Court's decision effectively granted Donald Trump immunity from prosecution. This has emboldened Trump to claim expanded presidential powers under Article II, raising concerns about the rule of law. His actions are viewed by some as dictatorial.

liberation.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 16, 16:19

Youth Climate Lawsuit Targets Trump Administration Policies

In a landmark case, young American plaintiffs are directly challenging the Trump administration's climate policies in court, arguing that these policies exacerbate climate change and harm their health and future, citing specific examples such as deregulation of fossil fuels and neglect of climate im...

Youth Climate Lawsuit Targets Trump Administration Policies

In a landmark case, young American plaintiffs are directly challenging the Trump administration's climate policies in court, arguing that these policies exacerbate climate change and harm their health and future, citing specific examples such as deregulation of fossil fuels and neglect of climate im...

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the central claim of the youth plaintiffs against the Trump administration?

The plaintiffs contend that the Trump administration's policies, including deregulation of fossil fuels and inadequate climate impact assessments, directly contribute to the worsening climate crisis, thereby harming their health and violating their right to a livable future. A 19-year-old plaintiff, Eva Lighthiser, whose family was forced to relocate due to climate change, exemplifies the case's human impact.

lemonde.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 10, 01:18

US Supreme Court to Review Legality of Trump-Era Tariffs

The US Supreme Court will review the legality of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in early November, following a federal appeals court ruling that deemed many of them illegal.

US Supreme Court to Review Legality of Trump-Era Tariffs

The US Supreme Court will review the legality of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in early November, following a federal appeals court ruling that deemed many of them illegal.

Progress

16% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the central issue in this Supreme Court case, and what are its immediate implications?

The Supreme Court will determine the legality of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump's administration. A federal appeals court deemed many of these tariffs illegal, but kept them in place pending the Supreme Court's decision. The outcome will significantly impact US trade policy and international relations.

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 8, 22:21

US Supreme Court Allows Federal Immigration Raids in Los Angeles to Continue

The US Supreme Court temporarily allowed federal agents to continue immigration raids in Los Angeles, overturning a lower court's decision that deemed them unconstitutional due to indiscriminate arrests based on race, language, or occupation.

US Supreme Court Allows Federal Immigration Raids in Los Angeles to Continue

The US Supreme Court temporarily allowed federal agents to continue immigration raids in Los Angeles, overturning a lower court's decision that deemed them unconstitutional due to indiscriminate arrests based on race, language, or occupation.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term consequences of this Supreme Court decision?

The Supreme Court's decision, while temporary, could embolden the administration to expand similar enforcement actions to other cities. It also sets a precedent impacting future challenges to immigration enforcement practices, potentially leading to further legal battles and highlighting ongoing debates about the balance between national security and civil liberties.

lexpress.fr

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 4, 19:16

Federal Appeals Court Rules Most Trump Tariffs Illegal

A federal appeals court ruled on August 29, 2025 that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are illegal because the IEEPA does not grant him the authority to set them; however, enforcement is stayed until October 14, and the Supreme Court could hear the case in early November.

Federal Appeals Court Rules Most Trump Tariffs Illegal

A federal appeals court ruled on August 29, 2025 that most of Donald Trump's tariffs are illegal because the IEEPA does not grant him the authority to set them; however, enforcement is stayed until October 14, and the Supreme Court could hear the case in early November.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the federal appeals court's decision on tariffs imposed by the Trump administration?

The court ruled that most tariffs imposed by Donald Trump are illegal due to exceeding the presidential authority granted by IEEPA. Enforcement is temporarily stayed until October 14th, allowing time for appeal to the Supreme Court. The decision could lead to a $200 billion refund to American businesses if upheld.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 23, 01:19

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Fire FTC Commissioner, Challenges 90-Year Precedent

The Supreme Court temporarily allowed President Trump to remove FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, setting up a December hearing that could overturn a landmark 1935 precedent protecting agency independence from presidential control.

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Fire FTC Commissioner, Challenges 90-Year Precedent

The Supreme Court temporarily allowed President Trump to remove FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, setting up a December hearing that could overturn a landmark 1935 precedent protecting agency independence from presidential control.

Progress

24% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the legal arguments underpinning both sides of this case, and what is the historical context?

The Trump administration argues that the FTC's expanded powers justify the president's ability to remove commissioners at will, challenging the 1935 Humphrey's Executor precedent. Slaughter's lawyers contend the FTC's evolution maintains its original intent and that the statutory protections remain constitutionally sound.

cnnespanol.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 20, 04:14

Trump Administration Appeals Passport Gender Marker Ruling to Supreme Court

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to restrict gender markers on passports for transgender and non-binary individuals, reversing a Biden-era policy allowing a gender "X" option and prompting legal challenges.

Trump Administration Appeals Passport Gender Marker Ruling to Supreme Court

The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court to restrict gender markers on passports for transgender and non-binary individuals, reversing a Biden-era policy allowing a gender "X" option and prompting legal challenges.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the legal arguments presented by both sides, and what precedents are cited?

The Trump administration argues that the lower courts erred by applying a higher standard of judicial review and that the policy doesn't violate the Equal Protection Clause, citing a June Supreme Court ruling supporting conservative legislation targeting transgender individuals. Conversely, lower courts ruled the policy discriminated based on sex, causing irreparable harm to affected individuals by potentially exposing them to discrimination and violence when using their passports.

welt.de

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Sep 10, 04:18

US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Trump's Tariff Policy

The US Supreme Court will hear a case in November regarding President Trump's tariff policy, following a lower court ruling against the administration's use of a national emergency law to justify tariffs on numerous countries.

US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Trump's Tariff Policy

The US Supreme Court will hear a case in November regarding President Trump's tariff policy, following a lower court ruling against the administration's use of a national emergency law to justify tariffs on numerous countries.

Progress

16% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential economic consequences of the Supreme Court's decision?

The US government argues that a ruling against the tariffs would cause a significant economic crisis, jeopardizing trade deals already reached with six major partners, including the European Union, which involved significant tariff concessions. These deals, it claims, were made possible by the tariffs imposed under the emergency powers act.

zeit.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 10, 04:18

US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Trump's Tariff Policy

The US Supreme Court will hear a case in November regarding President Trump's tariff policy, which was challenged by a dozen US states and resulted in a lower court ruling against Trump's use of a national emergency law to justify the tariffs.

US Supreme Court to Hear Case on Trump's Tariff Policy

The US Supreme Court will hear a case in November regarding President Trump's tariff policy, which was challenged by a dozen US states and resulted in a lower court ruling against Trump's use of a national emergency law to justify the tariffs.

Progress

12% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How have Trump's tariffs impacted US trade relationships, particularly with the EU?

Trump's tariffs, initially imposed in April, have led to several revised trade agreements with six major trade partners, including the EU, with tariffs as high as 15% on EU imports. The US government argues that overturning the tariffs would cause a major economic crisis, as these partners accepted new trade agreements that favored the US.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 6, 01:20

Trump Administration Faces Major Legal Setbacks in Federal Courts

Federal judges blocked multiple Trump administration actions this week, including deportation efforts, National Guard deployment, Harvard funding cuts, and the termination of protected status for immigrants, marking a significant legal reversal after a string of Supreme Court wins.

Trump Administration Faces Major Legal Setbacks in Federal Courts

Federal judges blocked multiple Trump administration actions this week, including deportation efforts, National Guard deployment, Harvard funding cuts, and the termination of protected status for immigrants, marking a significant legal reversal after a string of Supreme Court wins.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the courts justify their decisions, and what broader legal or constitutional principles are involved?

Courts deemed the administration's actions "unlawful" and "unconstitutional," citing violations of the First Amendment (Harvard funding), the Posse Comitatus Act (National Guard deployment), and questioning the basis for invoking the Alien Enemies Act. The rulings highlight the judiciary's role in checking executive power and upholding constitutional and statutory limits.

bbc.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 30, 16:16

Trump Tariffs Ruled Illegal: Appeals Court Decision and Potential Supreme Court Challenge

A US federal appeals court ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs were an overreach of presidential emergency powers, a 7-4 decision that could affect the US economy and global trade, prompting a likely Supreme Court challenge.

Trump Tariffs Ruled Illegal: Appeals Court Decision and Potential Supreme Court Challenge

A US federal appeals court ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs were an overreach of presidential emergency powers, a 7-4 decision that could affect the US economy and global trade, prompting a likely Supreme Court challenge.

Progress

20% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the appeals court's decision on the Trump tariffs?

The court's decision declared most of Trump's tariffs illegal, but they remain in place until mid-October. This creates uncertainty for businesses and global markets, potentially dampening economic activity while awaiting the Supreme Court's decision.

Showing 1 to 12 of 69 results