Tag #Yemen

Showing 73 to 84 of 564 results

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 17, 16:16

Houthi Attacks on Red Sea Shipping Condemned; Experts Urge Military Action

The U.S. State Department condemned recent Houthi attacks on cargo ships in the Red Sea and Israel, causing casualties and economic disruption, impacting the $1 trillion annual trade through the vital waterway. Experts call for renewed ground operations to counter the Iran-backed group.

Houthi Attacks on Red Sea Shipping Condemned; Experts Urge Military Action

The U.S. State Department condemned recent Houthi attacks on cargo ships in the Red Sea and Israel, causing casualties and economic disruption, impacting the $1 trillion annual trade through the vital waterway. Experts call for renewed ground operations to counter the Iran-backed group.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Houthi attacks on global trade and regional security?

The U.S. State Department condemned recent Houthi attacks on cargo ships in the Red Sea and on Israel, resulting in casualties and significant economic disruption. These attacks, supported by Iran, highlight the ongoing threat posed by the Houthi movement to regional stability and global shipping.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over U.S. Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit concerning the 2012 U.S. drone strike in Yemen, which utilized Ramstein Air Base, ruling that there was insufficient evidence of direct German government involvement in human rights violations, although it affirmed Germany's obligation to protect f...

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over U.S. Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit concerning the 2012 U.S. drone strike in Yemen, which utilized Ramstein Air Base, ruling that there was insufficient evidence of direct German government involvement in human rights violations, although it affirmed Germany's obligation to protect f...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader implications of this case for the use of drone technology in warfare and the legal accountability of states for actions taken abroad?

This ruling sets a precedent for future cases involving allegations of German complicity in extrajudicial killings abroad. The court's emphasis on the need for a demonstrable link between German actions and human rights violations may raise the bar for similar lawsuits. The ruling also underscores the challenges of regulating the use of drones and other advanced technologies in warfare and enforcing international humanitarian law.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 10:11

UN Extends Reporting on Houthi Red Sea Attacks Amidst Concerns Over Gaza Conflict

The UN Security Council extended reporting on Houthi attacks in the Red Sea until January 15, 2026, following recent attacks on the MV Magic Seas and MV Eternity C resulting in ship sinkings and hostage-takings; Russia, China, and Algeria abstained due to concerns over US airstrikes in Yemen and the...

UN Extends Reporting on Houthi Red Sea Attacks Amidst Concerns Over Gaza Conflict

The UN Security Council extended reporting on Houthi attacks in the Red Sea until January 15, 2026, following recent attacks on the MV Magic Seas and MV Eternity C resulting in ship sinkings and hostage-takings; Russia, China, and Algeria abstained due to concerns over US airstrikes in Yemen and the...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea relate to the broader conflicts in Gaza and Yemen?

The Houthi attacks, linked to the Gaza conflict, threaten regional stability and global supply chains by disrupting the crucial Red Sea trade route. Russia, China, and Algeria abstained, citing concerns about U.S. airstrikes in Yemen and the need for diplomatic solutions. The attacks highlight the complex interplay between regional conflicts and international maritime security.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strikes, Setting Precedent for Future Cases

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit against the government's role in US drone strikes in Yemen, citing insufficient evidence of German involvement in systematic international law violations; however, the ruling did define a high threshold for future legal challenges.

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strikes, Setting Precedent for Future Cases

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit against the government's role in US drone strikes in Yemen, citing insufficient evidence of German involvement in systematic international law violations; however, the ruling did define a high threshold for future legal challenges.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

Does Germany's provision of logistical support for potentially lethal drone strikes violate its citizens' constitutional right to life, and what are the immediate implications?

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit filed by relatives of two men killed in a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which utilized the Ramstein Air Base. The court ruled that while Germany must uphold fundamental human rights, the specific case lacked sufficient evidence of a systematic violation of international law by the US, deemed a state that considers civilian protection in counter-terrorism.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 16:13

German Court: No Obligation to Halt US Drone Strikes from Ramstein

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming Germany violated international law by allowing US drone operations from Ramstein Air Base, ruling that the necessary conditions for a duty of protection weren't met despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to uphold human rights and inte...

German Court: No Obligation to Halt US Drone Strikes from Ramstein

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming Germany violated international law by allowing US drone operations from Ramstein Air Base, ruling that the necessary conditions for a duty of protection weren't met despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to uphold human rights and inte...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

Does Germany have a legal obligation to prevent US drone strikes launched from Ramstein Air Base, even if those strikes violate international law?

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit by Yemeni citizens claiming Germany violated international law by not preventing US drone strikes from Ramstein Air Base. The court found that while Germany must protect human rights, in this case, the necessary conditions for a specific duty of protection—a sufficient relationship with German state authority and a serious risk of systematic international law violations—were not met.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 16:13

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike, Defining Limits of Responsibility

Germany's Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit by two Yemenis whose relatives died in a 2012 US drone strike facilitated by Ramstein Air Base; the court stated that Germany only has an obligation to protect foreign nationals if there is sufficient German state involvement and a serious r...

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike, Defining Limits of Responsibility

Germany's Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit by two Yemenis whose relatives died in a 2012 US drone strike facilitated by Ramstein Air Base; the court stated that Germany only has an obligation to protect foreign nationals if there is sufficient German state involvement and a serious r...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the court's decision balance Germany's obligations under international law with its role as a host nation for US military operations?

The court's decision highlights the complex interplay between national sovereignty, international law, and military alliances. The plaintiffs argued that Germany's facilitation of the drone strike through Ramstein Air Base constituted complicity in violating international law. However, the court determined that the provided evidence did not meet the threshold for establishing German responsibility, emphasizing the lack of clear evidence of unlawful targeting criteria used by the US.

nrc.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 19:15

Dutch Council of State Critiques Yemeni Asylum Policy

The Dutch Council of State ruled that the government must better justify its rejection of Yemeni asylum seekers, citing insufficient research into the conflict's intensity and impact on civilians, requiring a reassessment of numerous pending applications.

Dutch Council of State Critiques Yemeni Asylum Policy

The Dutch Council of State ruled that the government must better justify its rejection of Yemeni asylum seekers, citing insufficient research into the conflict's intensity and impact on civilians, requiring a reassessment of numerous pending applications.

Progress

24% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific flaws in the Dutch government's assessment of the Yemeni conflict led to the Council of State's ruling?

The Council of State ruled that the Dutch Minister for Asylum and Migration must better substantiate why not all Yemeni refugees receive asylum. Currently, only Yemenis facing personal danger are granted asylum. The Council criticized the lack of research into the active armed forces and the intensity of armed confrontations.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 01:13

Senate Democrats Grill Trump's UN Nominee Over Signal App Leak

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced intense questioning from Senate Democrats about his role in a Signal messaging leak concerning Yemen war plans; despite resigning as National Security Advisor, he remains on the White House payroll at $195,000 annually while facing investigations ...

Senate Democrats Grill Trump's UN Nominee Over Signal App Leak

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced intense questioning from Senate Democrats about his role in a Signal messaging leak concerning Yemen war plans; despite resigning as National Security Advisor, he remains on the White House payroll at $195,000 annually while facing investigations ...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Signal messaging app leak involving Mike Waltz and the Yemen war plans, and what is its global significance?

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced criticism from Senate Democrats regarding a Signal messaging app leak involving Yemen war plans. Democrats questioned his accountability and the administration's response, citing a lack of consequences despite the President's condemnation of leaks. Waltz defended his actions, stating Signal's approval for high-level officials and the absence of classified information in the leak.

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 01:13

Waltz Faces Senate Questions Over Sensitive Signal Chat

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced Senate scrutiny for a Signal group chat discussing Yemen strike plans that accidentally included a journalist; Waltz maintained no classified information was shared but acknowledged the incident prompted investigations and was embarrassing.

Waltz Faces Senate Questions Over Sensitive Signal Chat

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced Senate scrutiny for a Signal group chat discussing Yemen strike plans that accidentally included a journalist; Waltz maintained no classified information was shared but acknowledged the incident prompted investigations and was embarrassing.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the "Signalgate" incident, and how does it impact the US government's image and operations?

Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for UN ambassador, faced Senate questioning over a Signal group chat that accidentally included a journalist and discussed a planned Yemen strike. Waltz asserted no classified information was shared, despite admitting the incident was embarrassing and prompted investigations. He defended the use of Signal, claiming it was recommended by the Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 16, 13:15

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit regarding the 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, where Ramstein Air Base's infrastructure was used, stating insufficient evidence of systemic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to protect fundamental human rights, l...

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit on US Drone Strike in Yemen

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit regarding the 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, where Ramstein Air Base's infrastructure was used, stating insufficient evidence of systemic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's obligation to protect fundamental human rights, l...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of this ruling on Germany's foreign policy decisions regarding drone strikes and its relationship with the United States?

This decision sets a precedent for future cases involving foreign operations with German involvement. The court's emphasis on a 'sufficiently clear connection' to German state power and a 'serious risk of systematic violation of international law' suggests a high threshold for legal challenges, while simultaneously offering a framework for future accountability.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 22:11

German Court: No Basic Law Violation in Yemen Drone Strike

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Germany's indirect support of a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which killed civilians, violated the Basic Law's protection of life, determining that insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations existed, although ac...

German Court: No Basic Law Violation in Yemen Drone Strike

The German Constitutional Court dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Germany's indirect support of a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen, which killed civilians, violated the Basic Law's protection of life, determining that insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations existed, although ac...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What conditions did the court establish to determine the extent of German responsibility in cases of foreign military actions resulting in human rights violations?

The ruling highlights the complexities of applying fundamental human rights in contexts of international military operations. The court balanced the protection of human rights with the need for governmental leeway in foreign policy, establishing criteria for future cases: a sufficient link to German state authority and a demonstrable risk of systematic international law violations. This case involved indirect support via Ramstein Air Base, crucial for US drone operations due to geographical limitations.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 15, 19:14

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over US Drone Strike Using Ramstein Air Base

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit concerning a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen that used Ramstein Air Base, finding insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's human rights obligations and the deaths of civilians.

German Court Dismisses Lawsuit over US Drone Strike Using Ramstein Air Base

The German Constitutional Court rejected a lawsuit concerning a 2012 US drone strike in Yemen that used Ramstein Air Base, finding insufficient evidence of systematic international law violations despite acknowledging Germany's human rights obligations and the deaths of civilians.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the court's decision balance Germany's responsibility to protect human rights with its foreign policy interests?

The court's decision hinges on the requirement of a sufficient link to German state authority and a serious risk of systematic violation of international law. In the Yemen case, the court found neither, asserting that the US adequately considered civilian protection in its counter-terrorism efforts. The use of Ramstein Air Base was deemed essential for signal relay due to the earth's curvature, enabling direct drone strikes otherwise impossible.

Showing 73 to 84 of 564 results