dw.com
Cocoa Crisis: Record Prices Hit Farmers, Consumers Amidst Supply Chain Issues
Record cocoa prices, driven by a catastrophic harvest failure in West Africa due to the cocoa swollen shoot virus (CSSV) and exacerbated by climate change, are impacting global chocolate markets, with significant consequences for farmers and consumers alike.
- How have climate change and the CSSV outbreak contributed to the cocoa shortage and subsequent price increases?
- The CSSV outbreak, exacerbated by climate change and El Niño's erratic weather patterns, devastated cocoa harvests in major producing countries like Ghana and Ivory Coast. This reduced supply significantly increased prices, impacting chocolate affordability and potentially threatening smaller manufacturers. In contrast, larger companies successfully absorbed cost increases, highlighting the industry's uneven impact.",
- What are the immediate impacts of the record cocoa prices on cocoa farmers in West Africa and chocolate consumers in Europe?
- Record high cocoa prices are impacting producers, manufacturers, and consumers globally. A 2024 harvest failure, primarily due to the spread of cocoa swollen shoot virus (CSSV) in West Africa, caused a price surge exceeding that of copper. While large manufacturers maintain profits by passing increased costs to consumers, the situation severely impacts African farmers, with about 60% of global production affected.",
- What long-term systemic changes are needed to ensure the sustainable production of cocoa, considering the challenges posed by climate change and disease outbreaks?
- The cocoa crisis reveals systemic issues within the industry's supply chain. While higher prices may alleviate some human rights abuses like child labor previously associated with low cocoa prices, the long-term sustainability of cocoa production is threatened without investment in disease-resistant crops and improved farming practices. The future of cocoa production hinges on addressing climate change and ensuring fair compensation for farmers.",
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative prioritizes the impact on European consumers and chocolate makers, placing their experiences prominently in the article. While the challenges faced by African farmers are acknowledged, the emphasis on the European perspective could be perceived as prioritizing the concerns of wealthier consumers over those of the primary producers. The headline (if there was one) would likely reinforce this bias. The use of quotes from European manufacturers and experts adds to this focus, potentially overshadowing the voices of those most directly affected by the cocoa price increase.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, but some phrasing could be improved for greater objectivity. For example, describing the cocoa price increase as hitting producers, manufacturers, and consumers "a nível global" (at a global level) is accurate but could be replaced with a more specific breakdown of the impacts on different regions. The description of the situation as a "quebra de safra" (crop failure) is strong and may need some nuance depending on the context of crop failure, and how many crops are affected. The use of terms like "catastrófica" (catastrophic) and "excessivo" (excessive) introduces a degree of emotional language that might slightly skew neutrality. Replacing these with more measured descriptions would make the article more balanced.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the impact of the cocoa price increase on European chocolate manufacturers and consumers, giving less attention to the perspectives of cocoa farmers in other regions beyond Africa. While the plight of African farmers is mentioned, the article could benefit from including more diverse voices and perspectives from other cocoa-producing countries to provide a more comprehensive global picture. The challenges faced by smaller chocolate producers in Europe are detailed, but a similar in-depth look at the struggles of smaller producers in other parts of the world would enhance the article's objectivity. The article also omits discussion of potential solutions beyond simply increasing prices, such as exploring sustainable farming practices and fair trade initiatives.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between large chocolate manufacturers who can absorb price increases and maintain profits, and smaller producers who are struggling. The reality is likely more nuanced, with varying degrees of impact across the industry. It also simplifies the issue of climate change, focusing on its impact on yields without a thorough discussion of other contributing factors to the cocoa crisis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant cacao crop failure due to disease and climate change, impacting the livelihoods of farmers and potentially leading to food insecurity in cacao-producing regions. Reduced cacao production also leads to higher chocolate prices, making it less accessible to vulnerable populations.