dw.com
Cocoa Crisis: Record Prices Hit Producers, Consumers as Climate Change and Virus Devastate Harvests
Record-high cocoa prices, driven by a 2024 West African harvest failure due to CSSV virus and climate change, are impacting global chocolate markets, with large manufacturers absorbing costs while smaller producers struggle, and consumers facing price increases of up to 35% since 2020.
- What are the primary causes of the record-high cocoa prices, and what are their immediate consequences for producers and consumers?
- Record high cocoa prices are impacting producers, manufacturers, and consumers globally. A 2024 harvest failure in West Africa, primarily due to the spread of CSSV (Cocoa swollen shoot virus), drastically reduced supply. This, coupled with climate change impacts, caused a price surge exceeding that of copper in 2025, increasing chocolate prices by 35% since 2020.
- How have large chocolate manufacturers responded to the increased cocoa prices, and what are the implications for their profitability and market share?
- The cocoa price increase is primarily due to a catastrophic harvest failure in West Africa, impacting four major cocoa-producing countries. The CSSV virus, exacerbated by climate change and El Niño weather patterns, reduced yields by up to 50% in two years, affecting approximately 60% of global production. While large manufacturers absorbed increased costs, smaller producers faced severe economic hardship.
- What are the long-term implications of the cocoa price crisis for cocoa production and the future availability of chocolate, and what measures are needed to mitigate these risks?
- The long-term impact of the cocoa crisis is uncertain. While large chocolate manufacturers have maintained profitability by passing increased costs to consumers, smaller producers face potential collapse. Lack of investment in sustainable farming practices and climate-resistant crops risks continued price volatility and potentially threatens future cocoa production, especially given farmers' declining interest in the profession due to low past incomes.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the challenges faced by European consumers and chocolate makers, giving significant attention to price increases and the potential for business failures in Europe. While the struggles of African farmers are acknowledged, the narrative structure and emphasis place the European experience more prominently. The headline (if there were one) likely would have focused on the price increases and scarcity in Europe, rather than the underlying issues in Africa.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although certain phrases could be considered slightly loaded. For example, describing the situation as a 'catastrophic harvest' is emotive. A more neutral alternative could be 'severely reduced harvest'. Similarly, terms like 'record highs' and 'soaring prices' contribute to a sense of crisis. While appropriate in context, these terms may amplify the negative impact without necessarily presenting alternative interpretations or perspectives.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the impact of high cocoa prices on large manufacturers and consumers, particularly in Europe. While it mentions the plight of African farmers, the analysis lacks depth regarding the systemic issues contributing to their vulnerability, such as exploitative trade practices and lack of investment in sustainable farming techniques. The long-term consequences of these issues for cocoa production are briefly touched upon but not fully explored. The perspective of smaller chocolate producers outside of Europe is largely absent.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by contrasting the struggles of small chocolate makers with the apparent success of large corporations in maintaining profits. It suggests that large companies are easily able to pass increased costs onto consumers, while smaller businesses struggle. This overlooks the complexities of pricing strategies, market competition, and varying levels of financial resilience within both small and large businesses. The impact of the price increase on consumers is mentioned but without a detailed analysis of its effects across different socioeconomic groups.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how low cocoa prices in previous years led to underpayment of farmers, resulting in widespread child labor and human rights violations. While the recent price surge might improve farmers' income, the long-term sustainability of cocoa production is uncertain without investment in higher yields and climate-resilient crops. This directly impacts the ability of cocoa farmers to escape poverty and achieve decent living standards.