dw.com
DW Offers Psiphon and Other Methods to Bypass Censorship in Turkey
DW provides Turkish users with Psiphon, a censorship circumvention tool, available for Android and Windows, along with alternative methods like VPNs and the Tor browser, to access its content and other blocked websites.
- What are the implications of internet throttling, and how can users mitigate its effects?
- Internet throttling, where internet service providers slow down specific traffic, makes accessing certain websites difficult, similar to 'driving on a single-lane road instead of a five-lane highway'. VPNs are the most effective way to bypass throttling, which is often implemented to restrict access to social media during social events.
- What alternative methods does DW recommend for bypassing censorship and accessing its content?
- DW suggests using VPNs, recommending BeePassVPN, ProtonVPN, Lantern, and Free Browser. They also recommend the Tor browser, downloadable from http://torproject.org/tdownload or via email to gettor@torproject.org, or the Onion Browser for iOS devices.
- What is Psiphon, and how can Turkish users access it to bypass censorship and access DW content?
- Psiphon is a free, open-source censorship circumvention tool offered by DW to Turkish Android and Windows users. Users can access it by sending a blank email to dw-n@psiphon3.com to receive a download link. It allows access to DW content and other blocked websites.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The text promotes Psiphon and Tor browser as solutions for accessing DW content in countries with censorship, framing them as reliable and easy-to-use tools. This framing might overshadow other potential methods or considerations regarding online security and privacy. The positive descriptions of Psiphon, emphasizing speed and reliability, could create an overly optimistic view of its capabilities. The section on VPNs acknowledges some security concerns but primarily lists options without extensive comparison or detailed analysis of their respective privacy policies.
Language Bias
The text uses positive and persuasive language when describing Psiphon and Tor, terms like "reliable," "fast," and "easy-to-use" are used. There's also a slightly negative connotation when discussing VPNs by stating that not all providers prioritize privacy equally, however this is immediately followed by a list of VPN providers without highlighting any privacy concerns of any of these providers. The description of bandwidth throttling as "falling from a five-lane highway to a single-lane road" is a strong metaphor that might influence readers' emotional response.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Psiphon and Tor, omitting other methods for bypassing censorship or accessing blocked content. It doesn't discuss the potential limitations or risks associated with using these tools, such as their reliance on third-party servers or the possibility of data interception. While VPNs are mentioned, this section lacks a comprehensive comparison of different VPN providers or in-depth discussion of their security implications. Also missing are discussions of the legal implications of circumventing censorship in various countries.
False Dichotomy
The article presents Psiphon and Tor as primary solutions without acknowledging the range of other technologies and strategies for accessing blocked content. The description of bandwidth throttling as a simple eitheor situation (five-lane highway to a single-lane road) is an oversimplification. The complexity of internet censorship and its varied forms are not fully explored.
Sustainable Development Goals
Access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) is crucial for economic empowerment and participation in the digital economy, which can contribute to poverty reduction. Providing free access to tools like Psiphon helps overcome digital divides, enabling individuals to access online resources and opportunities that might otherwise be unavailable due to censorship or lack of access.