dw.com
DW Offers Psiphon for Censorship Circumvention in Turkey
DW provides Turkish Android and Windows users with free access to Psiphon, a censorship circumvention tool developed by the University of Toronto, enabling access to blocked websites, including DW content.
- What is Psiphon, and how does it help users in Turkey access DW content?
- Psiphon is a free, open-source censorship circumvention tool offered by DW to Turkish users. Users can access it by emailing dw-n@psiphon3.com to receive a download link. This allows access to DW content and other blocked websites.
- What are the potential future implications of censorship and internet restrictions, and how might tools like Psiphon and VPNs adapt?
- Internet throttling, where ISPs deliberately slow down specific traffic, is a significant concern. Tools like Psiphon and VPNs will need to adapt to new censorship methods, ensuring users can maintain reliable and fast access to information.
- What alternative methods are available for accessing blocked digital content, and what are their respective advantages and disadvantages?
- VPNs, such as BeePassVPN, ProtonVPN, Lantern, and Free Browser, offer alternative access. While effective, not all VPN providers prioritize user privacy equally. Tor browser also provides anonymity but isn't available on iOS; Onion Browser is suggested as an alternative.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article promotes Psiphon and other tools as solutions for accessing blocked content, framing them positively without acknowledging potential drawbacks or alternative solutions. The repeated emphasis on ease of use ('saniyeler içinde', 'only need to send a blank email') and positive attributes ('güvenilir hem de hızlı', 'en güvenilir VPN uygulamalarından biri') create a favorable impression. The inclusion of direct links to VPN services further strengthens this positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and persuasive, describing Psiphon as 'güvenilir' (reliable), 'hızlı' (fast), and 'en güvenilir' (most reliable). These terms aren't inherently biased, but their repeated use and lack of counterbalancing negative information create a biased tone. The description of throttling as 'beş şeritli bir otobanda tek şeritli bir yola düşme' (falling from a five-lane highway to a one-lane road) is a strong metaphor emphasizing the negative impact, potentially influencing the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The article omits potential downsides of using Psiphon or VPNs, such as security risks, privacy concerns, and the possibility of Psiphon being blocked itself. It also doesn't discuss the ethical implications of circumventing censorship, nor does it explore alternative methods for accessing information in a comprehensive way. While the mention of risks associated with VPNs is included, the potential risks associated with Psiphon are completely left out.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only way to access blocked content is through the use of Psiphon or a VPN. It doesn't discuss alternative strategies, like using different internet providers or accessing information through alternative channels.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes tools and methods to overcome internet censorship and access digital content, thus promoting equal access to information and opportunities, which directly relates to SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. Providing free access to Psiphon for users in certain countries addresses the digital divide and ensures equal access to information, regardless of geographical location or government restrictions. The mention of VPNs and Tor browser further supports this by offering alternative methods to bypass censorship.