dw.com
Sahel Terrorism: Opacity, Casualties, and a War of Narratives
In 2024, the Sahel experienced a surge in terrorism, with Burkina Faso suffering over 1,500 deaths, while military governments in the region maintain a policy of silence regarding casualties, hindering accurate assessments and undermining public trust.
- Why do the military governments in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger maintain a policy of silence regarding casualties, and what are the consequences of this approach?
- Military juntas in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, who seized power promising improved security, have failed to curb the escalating jihadist threat, leading to an increase in violence and insecurity. The lack of transparency regarding military and civilian casualties hinders accurate assessment, contributing to a 'war of narratives' between the governments and terrorist groups.
- What is the extent of the human cost of the jihadist conflict in the Sahel, and how does this impact the credibility of the military governments' claims of success?
- In 2024, the Sahel was the epicenter of global terrorism, with 3,885 deaths out of a total of 7,555, according to the Global Terrorism Index. However, the Center for Strategic Studies in Africa estimates this figure could exceed 10,000 deaths. Burkina Faso was the hardest-hit country for the second year in a row, with over 1,500 deaths.
- What strategies could be implemented to improve transparency and communication around security issues in the Sahel, and how could this build trust between the governments and the population?
- The opacity surrounding casualties, driven by the military regimes' attempts to maintain control and avoid demoralizing the population, creates a severe information deficit and fuels mistrust. This lack of transparency impacts the efficacy of counter-terrorism efforts and hinders the ability to support the affected families appropriately. The use of social media as the primary source of information regarding military deaths highlights a systemic failure of communication.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article is relatively balanced, presenting the perspectives of both the military regimes and various analysts and researchers who criticize their lack of transparency. While the article highlights the severe security situation, it also explains the reasons behind the military's communication strategies, offering context rather than simply condemning their actions. The headline, if any, would greatly influence the framing, and without it, a balanced approach is maintained.
Language Bias
The article maintains a largely neutral tone. While it describes the situation as severe, it uses factual information and quotes from various sources to support its claims. The use of words like "propaganda" to describe the communication strategies of both sides could be considered slightly loaded, but given the context, it seems justified. There is no overtly biased language.
Bias by Omission
The article mentions the lack of transparency regarding military and civilian casualties in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. While it cites figures from the Global Terrorism Index and the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, it acknowledges the difficulty in obtaining precise and reliable data due to the control of information by the military regimes. This omission of precise, verifiable data from official sources limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion on the severity of the situation. However, given the context of controlled information and the inherent difficulties in collecting data in active conflict zones, this omission is partly understandable.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the deteriorating security situation in the Sahel region due to the proliferation of jihadist groups. Military takeovers, initially promising security improvements, have instead led to increased violence and a lack of transparency regarding casualties. This undermines peace, justice, and the rule of law, hindering the ability of institutions to protect citizens and maintain order. The suppression of information and lack of accountability contribute to a climate of fear and instability.