theguardian.com
TikTok Skincare Routines Pose Skin Risks to Young Girls
A study analyzing 100 TikTok skincare routines by young girls (ages 7-18) found that these complex, expensive regimes (avg. $168, some over $500) offer minimal benefits but significantly increase the risk of skin irritation and allergies due to ingredients like citric acid and fragrances, with only 26% including sunscreen.
- What are the immediate risks associated with young girls following complex skincare routines promoted on TikTok, and how significant are these risks?
- A recent study reveals that popular TikTok skincare routines used by young girls are not only expensive and time-consuming but also potentially harmful, increasing the risk of skin irritation and allergies. The study analyzed 100 videos and found an average of six products used per routine, costing $168, with some exceeding $500. Researchers highlight that the benefits are minimal, and the risks far outweigh any potential gains.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this trend on the skin health and self-esteem of young girls, and what measures can be implemented to mitigate the risks?
- The long-term implications of these trends are significant. Early and excessive use of skincare products can disrupt the skin's natural barrier, leading to chronic sensitivity and increased susceptibility to future skin problems. This study underscores the need for media literacy and responsible marketing practices directed towards young audiences.
- What role do aspirational beauty ideals and marketing practices play in promoting the adoption of unnecessary and potentially harmful skincare routines among young girls?
- The study published in Paediatrics highlights a concerning trend of young girls following elaborate skincare routines promoted on TikTok. This trend is driven by aspirational beauty standards, often associated with specific skin tones and unrealistic expectations. The researchers found a significant lack of sunscreen usage in many routines despite the inclusion of ingredients that increase sun sensitivity, thereby increasing the likelihood of skin damage.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately frame the issue negatively, highlighting the risks and unnecessary nature of the skincare routines. The researchers' quotes emphasize the potential harm, creating a strong negative impression before presenting any nuances. While this approach grabs attention, it may overly alarm parents and underestimate the potential for responsible skincare education.
Language Bias
The language used is generally strong and emphasizes the negative consequences. Phrases like "potentially harmful," "risks far outweighs," and "worsen your skin integrity" create a sense of alarm. While accurate, using less emotionally charged language might be more balanced, such as "may cause irritation" or "can potentially impact skin health." The description of the girls' skin as "clear, light skin without visible blemishes" may subtly reinforce beauty standards related to skin tone.
Bias by Omission
The study focuses on the negative impacts of TikTok skincare routines on young girls' skin, but it omits discussion on potential benefits or positive aspects of skincare routines for teenagers with specific skin conditions. It also doesn't explore alternative, less costly skincare options that might be safer for young skin. The lack of discussion regarding the benefits of proper skincare education could be considered an omission.
False Dichotomy
The study presents a somewhat false dichotomy by contrasting complex, expensive skincare routines with only a gentle cleanser and sunscreen. While it is true that excessive routines are harmful, it doesn't explore the possibility of a middle ground—a simple routine with a few carefully selected products to address specific skin concerns. This oversimplification might discourage some viewers from seeking appropriate skincare solutions for their unique needs.
Gender Bias
The study notes that almost all content creators were girls. While this observation is valid and relevant to the findings, the analysis could be strengthened by explicitly addressing whether gender plays a role in the marketing and promotion of these products to young people, and how this might perpetuate beauty standards. It also could mention whether similar trends exist among boys.
Sustainable Development Goals
The study highlights the negative impact of complex skincare routines on young girls' skin health, increasing the risk of irritations and allergies. The unnecessary use of multiple products with potential allergens is detrimental to their skin integrity and well-being. The lack of sunscreen use further exacerbates the risk of sun damage.