Tag #Legal Battle

Showing 109 to 120 of 292 results

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 13:19

Smokey Robinson sued for $50 million over sexual assault allegations

Four former Hispanic housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Motown legend Smokey Robinson and his wife, alleging sexual battery, including rape, false imprisonment, and labor violations, dating back to 2006.

Smokey Robinson sued for $50 million over sexual assault allegations

Four former Hispanic housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Motown legend Smokey Robinson and his wife, alleging sexual battery, including rape, false imprisonment, and labor violations, dating back to 2006.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the specific allegations against Smokey Robinson, and what is the immediate impact of this lawsuit on his reputation and career?

Four former housekeepers have accused Smokey Robinson of sexual battery, including rape, false imprisonment, and labor violations, seeking $50 million in damages. Robinson's lawyer called the allegations "vile" and "false", suggesting they are an attempt to extort money. The lawsuit, filed on Tuesday, includes Robinson's wife, Frances, for allegedly contributing to a hostile work environment.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 7, 07:18

Smokey Robinson, Wife Sued for $50 Million Over Sexual Assault and Workplace Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson and his wife in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, alleging repeated sexual assault, false imprisonment, and workplace violations, including underpayment and lack of rest periods, from 2007 to the present.

Smokey Robinson, Wife Sued for $50 Million Over Sexual Assault and Workplace Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson and his wife in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, alleging repeated sexual assault, false imprisonment, and workplace violations, including underpayment and lack of rest periods, from 2007 to the present.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the lawsuit filed against Smokey Robinson and his wife?

Four women filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson and his wife, alleging sexual battery, assault, false imprisonment, and workplace violations. The women, former housekeepers, claim repeated sexual assaults and coercion, with one incident dating back to 2007. They allege forced resignations and inadequate compensation.

npr.org

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 7, 07:17

Supreme Court Allows Trump's Transgender Military Ban

The Supreme Court temporarily reinstated the Trump administration's ban on transgender individuals serving in the military, reversing lower court decisions, and potentially affecting numerous current and aspiring transgender service members. The case will return to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Supreme Court Allows Trump's Transgender Military Ban

The Supreme Court temporarily reinstated the Trump administration's ban on transgender individuals serving in the military, reversing lower court decisions, and potentially affecting numerous current and aspiring transgender service members. The case will return to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate impact does the Supreme Court's decision have on transgender individuals currently serving in, or seeking to enlist in, the U.S. military?

The Supreme Court temporarily reinstated the Trump administration's ban on transgender military service members, allowing the ban's implementation while lower court litigation continues. This decision reverses a lower court's temporary block, impacting numerous transgender service members currently serving or seeking enlistment. The ban affects all transgender individuals, barring them from enlisting and potentially discharging those currently serving.

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 3, 10:12

Prince Harry: UK Return Impossible Due to Security Ruling

Prince Harry's BBC interview details his impossible return to the UK with his family due to a court ruling on his security, highlighting a family dispute and criticism of royal security protocols.

Prince Harry: UK Return Impossible Due to Security Ruling

Prince Harry's BBC interview details his impossible return to the UK with his family due to a court ruling on his security, highlighting a family dispute and criticism of royal security protocols.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What systemic changes within the UK government and royal family are necessary to prevent similar situations arising in the future?

The interview suggests a lasting rift within the royal family, fueled by disagreements over security and Prince Harry's memoir. The future may see continued tension unless significant changes occur in how the royal family addresses its internal conflicts and the government reviews the royal security protocols. This case sets a precedent that could affect other royals.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 2, 10:12

Murder Charges Dropped in Acquaro Case Due to Informant Protection

Murder charges against Vincenzo Crupi for the March 2016 killing of Joseph "Pino" Acquaro, a police informant, have been dropped by the Victorian director of public prosecutions due to concerns about revealing the identity of a confidential informant, Informer Z, which would have been required for a...

Murder Charges Dropped in Acquaro Case Due to Informant Protection

Murder charges against Vincenzo Crupi for the March 2016 killing of Joseph "Pino" Acquaro, a police informant, have been dropped by the Victorian director of public prosecutions due to concerns about revealing the identity of a confidential informant, Informer Z, which would have been required for a...

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What factors led to the court's decision requiring the disclosure of police informant identities?

The case's dismissal stems from a court ruling that would have compelled Victoria police to reveal the identity of a key informant, Informer Z. This disclosure was deemed necessary for Crupi's defense, as he argued others had motive to kill Acquaro. The prosecution's decision followed a review and discussions with Acquaro's family.

nos.nl

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 1, 16:13

Apple Faces Contempt of Court Charges for Defying App Store Ruling

A US court held Apple in contempt for violating a 2021 order to end anti-competitive App Store practices, potentially criminally charging a manager for perjury; Apple imposed a 27% commission on outside purchases, defying the court's mandate to allow developers to direct users to cheaper alternative...

Apple Faces Contempt of Court Charges for Defying App Store Ruling

A US court held Apple in contempt for violating a 2021 order to end anti-competitive App Store practices, potentially criminally charging a manager for perjury; Apple imposed a 27% commission on outside purchases, defying the court's mandate to allow developers to direct users to cheaper alternative...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did Apple's 27% commission on external purchases contribute to the court's finding of contempt?

Apple's non-compliance stems from its implementation of a 27% commission on purchases outside the App Store, deemed by the court as an anti-competitive measure designed to deter users from cheaper alternatives. This decision connects to broader concerns about Apple's monopolistic practices and impacts developers' profitability and consumer choice. The court's action underscores the growing global scrutiny of tech giants' business models.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 8, 13:20

Smokey Robinson Faces $50 Million Lawsuit Alleging Sexual Assault and Labor Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson in Los Angeles on May 6, alleging sexual assault, false imprisonment, and labor violations from 2007-2024; Robinson's lawyer called the claims a money grab.

Smokey Robinson Faces $50 Million Lawsuit Alleging Sexual Assault and Labor Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson in Los Angeles on May 6, alleging sexual assault, false imprisonment, and labor violations from 2007-2024; Robinson's lawyer called the claims a money grab.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term consequences of this lawsuit, both for Smokey Robinson and for how similar cases are handled in the future?

This case may impact how future lawsuits against celebrities are handled, particularly concerning the vulnerability of low-wage workers. The extensive timeline of alleged abuse and the public attention the case has received could influence future legal strategies for similar cases and lead to increased scrutiny of power dynamics in employment settings. The high financial stakes also set a precedent.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 7, 07:17

Smokey Robinson and Wife Sued for $50 Million Over Alleged Sexual Assault and Workplace Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson and his wife in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, alleging repeated sexual assaults, false imprisonment, and multiple workplace violations, including minimum wage violations and lack of rest periods, dating back to 200...

Smokey Robinson and Wife Sued for $50 Million Over Alleged Sexual Assault and Workplace Violations

Four former housekeepers filed a $50 million lawsuit against Smokey Robinson and his wife in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, alleging repeated sexual assaults, false imprisonment, and multiple workplace violations, including minimum wage violations and lack of rest periods, dating back to 200...

Progress

68% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the lawsuit connect the alleged sexual assaults to broader issues of power dynamics and potential systemic failures?

The lawsuit connects the alleged sexual assaults to broader patterns of workplace abuse and exploitation. The plaintiffs, all Hispanic women, claim Robinson used his power dynamic to coerce them into sexual acts, and his wife allegedly enabled the abuse. This highlights systemic issues of power imbalance and potential impunity for wealthy individuals.

pda.kp.ru

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 5, 19:20

Mother Flees to Ukraine with Daughter, Evading Russian Authorities for Four Years

Kristina T., a Moscow resident, fled to Ukraine with her 2-year-old daughter in late 2021, taking luxury items and passports; she is now evading Russian and international authorities while denying her husband, Andrey, access to their child, leading to ongoing legal battles and international investig...

Mother Flees to Ukraine with Daughter, Evading Russian Authorities for Four Years

Kristina T., a Moscow resident, fled to Ukraine with her 2-year-old daughter in late 2021, taking luxury items and passports; she is now evading Russian and international authorities while denying her husband, Andrey, access to their child, leading to ongoing legal battles and international investig...

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Kristina T.'s actions, specifically concerning her child's well-being and Andrey's legal recourse?

In late 2021, Kristina T. fled Moscow with her 2-year-old daughter, Emilia, and a collection of luxury goods, illegally crossing the border into Ukraine. She has remained there, evading Russian authorities and Interpol, for four years, denying her husband, Andrey, access to their child.

forbes.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 3, 19:17

Trump Golf Clubs Maintain Liquor Licenses Amidst Legal Uncertainty

Two New Jersey golf clubs owned by Donald Trump are still serving alcohol despite non-renewed liquor licenses, due to temporary permit extensions, while the state weighs whether his felony conviction disqualifies him.

Trump Golf Clubs Maintain Liquor Licenses Amidst Legal Uncertainty

Two New Jersey golf clubs owned by Donald Trump are still serving alcohol despite non-renewed liquor licenses, due to temporary permit extensions, while the state weighs whether his felony conviction disqualifies him.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of New Jersey's delayed decision on Donald Trump's golf clubs' liquor licenses?

Two New Jersey golf clubs owned by Donald Trump continue serving alcohol despite the state not renewing their liquor licenses. The Trump Organization claims Trump's felony conviction is irrelevant as he doesn't directly hold the licenses. Temporary permits have been extended, allowing alcohol service to continue.

liberation.fr

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

May 1, 22:14

Judge Holds Apple in Contempt for Failing to Open App Store

A US federal judge held Apple in contempt of court for failing to comply with a 2021 order to open its iPhone app ecosystem, ordering Apple to stop collecting commissions on transactions outside its App Store and to cease using tactics to dissuade users from third-party app stores; the decision foll...

Judge Holds Apple in Contempt for Failing to Open App Store

A US federal judge held Apple in contempt of court for failing to comply with a 2021 order to open its iPhone app ecosystem, ordering Apple to stop collecting commissions on transactions outside its App Store and to cease using tactics to dissuade users from third-party app stores; the decision foll...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did Apple's actions following the 2021 court ruling contribute to the judge's decision to hold the company in contempt?

The judge's decision stems from a 2021 lawsuit filed by Epic Games, which accused Apple of abusing its dominant market position by charging excessive commissions (30%) for app sales. Apple's subsequent actions, including implementing a new 27% commission for transactions outside the App Store and using tactics to discourage users from using alternative platforms, led the judge to conclude that Apple deliberately disobeyed the court's order.

smh.com.au

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 1, 07:16

Secret Recording Admitted in Roberts-Smith Defamation Appeal

A secret recording of journalist Nick McKenzie discussing Ben Roberts-Smith's legal strategy with a witness in Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in his appeal, potentially impacting the trial's outcome and raising questions about journalistic ethics.

Secret Recording Admitted in Roberts-Smith Defamation Appeal

A secret recording of journalist Nick McKenzie discussing Ben Roberts-Smith's legal strategy with a witness in Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in his appeal, potentially impacting the trial's outcome and raising questions about journalistic ethics.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the significance of the secret recording's admission to the Roberts-Smith defamation appeal?

A secret recording of a conversation between journalist Nick McKenzie and a witness (Person 17) in Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in Roberts-Smith's appeal. The recording, obtained by Roberts-Smith's lawyers, allegedly shows McKenzie discussing Roberts-Smith's legal strategy. Roberts-Smith claims this constitutes a miscarriage of justice.

Showing 109 to 120 of 292 results