Tag #Legal Battle

Showing 13 to 24 of 150 results

elmundo.es

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 24, 13:13

Spanish Citizenship Granted to Intellectually Disabled Son After Legal Battle

A Peruvian couple in Fuerteventura won a legal battle to grant their 35-year-old son with 71% intellectual disability Spanish citizenship without the usual political and cultural exam, after a long struggle and appeal to the Defensor del Pueblo.

Spanish Citizenship Granted to Intellectually Disabled Son After Legal Battle

A Peruvian couple in Fuerteventura won a legal battle to grant their 35-year-old son with 71% intellectual disability Spanish citizenship without the usual political and cultural exam, after a long struggle and appeal to the Defensor del Pueblo.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did advocacy groups and legal recourse contribute to the resolution of this case, and what broader implications does this outcome have for similar situations?

The case underscores systemic issues in Spain's citizenship application process, specifically concerning its adaptability for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The initial denial of exemption from the exam, despite the son's significant disability, reveals a lack of inclusive procedures. The successful appeal, facilitated by the association Entre Mares and the Defensor del Pueblo, demonstrates the crucial role of advocacy in overcoming bureaucratic barriers.

roma.repubblica.it

🌐 35% Global Worthiness

Mar 22, 04:08

Montespaccato Celebrates Anniversary Amidst Legal Battle Threatening Community Center

Asilo Savoia and Gruppo Sportivo Montespaccato launched "Spring of Legality," celebrating Montespaccato's 80th anniversary and Coppa Italia win, while highlighting a legal battle threatening local sports and community programs.

Montespaccato Celebrates Anniversary Amidst Legal Battle Threatening Community Center

Asilo Savoia and Gruppo Sportivo Montespaccato launched "Spring of Legality," celebrating Montespaccato's 80th anniversary and Coppa Italia win, while highlighting a legal battle threatening local sports and community programs.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the immediate impact of the "Spring of Legality" initiative on the Montespaccato community?

Asilo Savoia and Gruppo Sportivo Montespaccato commemorated the "Day of Remembrance and Commitment in memory of the victims of the mafia" with the "Spring of Legality" initiative. A local exhibit opened, celebrating Montespaccato's 80th anniversary and the neighborhood soccer team's Coppa Italia victory. This event, part of the "Neighborhood Pact for Montespaccato," aims to counter mafia influence and celebrate community achievements.

dw.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $50 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million for organizing 2016 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation, impacting Greenpeace's operations and raising concerns about free speech.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the North Dakota jury's decision ordering Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $50 million in damages?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, $50 million in damages for organizing protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Reservation in 2016. This ruling follows a lawsuit alleging defamation, trespass, and other acts by Greenpeace. The verdict has significant implications for environmental activism and freedom of speech.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 10:09

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury awarded Energy Transfer $660 million in damages from Greenpeace, concluding a lawsuit stemming from 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline's construction, which caused costly delays; Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and legal implications of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace for its role in the Dakota Access Pipeline protests?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer $660 million for damages related to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The verdict followed a lawsuit alleging defamation, nuisance, and disruption of construction. This decision could have significant financial implications for Greenpeace.

foxnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $660 Million Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline, a verdict the environmental group plans to appeal, citing concerns about the chilling effect on free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $660 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how does this impact environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million for its role in protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline. Greenpeace has been found liable for defamation, trespass, and other charges, with the damages distributed among three Greenpeace entities. The organization plans to appeal the verdict, calling the lawsuit an attempt to silence dissent.

cincodias.elpais.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 10:09

García Carrión Fine Reduced for Late Supplier Payments

The Madrid High Court of Justice reduced García Carrión's €100,000 fine for exceeding the 60-day payment limit to suppliers to €95,000, ruling the infraction "serious" but not "very serious" due to insufficient evidence of reoccurrence, despite the winery's use of confirming, a financial tool to ext...

García Carrión Fine Reduced for Late Supplier Payments

The Madrid High Court of Justice reduced García Carrión's €100,000 fine for exceeding the 60-day payment limit to suppliers to €95,000, ruling the infraction "serious" but not "very serious" due to insufficient evidence of reoccurrence, despite the winery's use of confirming, a financial tool to ext...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Madrid High Court of Justice's ruling on García Carrión's appeal concerning late payments to suppliers?

García Carrión, a Spanish winery, had its €100,000 fine for late payments to suppliers reduced to €95,000 by the Madrid High Court of Justice. The court deemed the infraction "serious" but not "very serious", as the reoccurrence requirement wasn't met due to prior rulings. The winery used confirming, a financial tool to extend payment beyond the 60-day legal limit, deemed unacceptable by the court.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 23, 13:11

Minnesota Judge Upholds State Prosecution of Cannabis Crimes on Tribal Lands

A Minnesota judge ruled that the state can prosecute cannabis-related crimes on tribal lands, impacting Todd Thompson, a White Earth Band member arrested for selling cannabis despite state legalization; this raises concerns about Indigenous sovereignty and the effectiveness of social equity provisio...

Minnesota Judge Upholds State Prosecution of Cannabis Crimes on Tribal Lands

A Minnesota judge ruled that the state can prosecute cannabis-related crimes on tribal lands, impacting Todd Thompson, a White Earth Band member arrested for selling cannabis despite state legalization; this raises concerns about Indigenous sovereignty and the effectiveness of social equity provisio...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Minnesota judge's ruling on the sale of cannabis on tribal lands, and what does this signify for Indigenous sovereignty and social equity in the cannabis industry?

A Minnesota judge upheld the state's authority to prosecute cannabis-related crimes on tribal lands, impacting a tribal member, Todd Thompson, who was arrested for selling cannabis on the White Earth reservation despite state legalization. This ruling raises concerns about Indigenous sovereignty and the effectiveness of state-level cannabis social equity provisions.

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 21, 10:12

NewJeans Loses Court Case Against K-pop Label Ador

A South Korean court ruled against K-pop group NewJeans, ordering them to uphold their contract with Ador after they sought to leave the label following allegations of mistreatment and career undermining by Hybe and Ador; the group plans to appeal.

NewJeans Loses Court Case Against K-pop Label Ador

A South Korean court ruled against K-pop group NewJeans, ordering them to uphold their contract with Ador after they sought to leave the label following allegations of mistreatment and career undermining by Hybe and Ador; the group plans to appeal.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the removal of NewJeans' mentor and subsequent allegations of mistreatment contribute to the legal dispute?

The ruling stems from a dispute that began in August 2024, involving accusations of mistreatment, the removal of their mentor, and alleged career undermining by Hybe and Ador. NewJeans' attempt to terminate their contract and pursue independent activities led to Ador's lawsuit and injunction. The court's emphasis on financial damages to Ador highlights the complexities of K-pop contracts and the power imbalance between labels and artists.

tr.euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 16:13

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A US court ruled that Greenpeace must pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, which carries approximately 5% of the US's daily oil production; Greenpeace plans to appeal the decision.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary impact of the court's decision on Greenpeace and environmental activism?

A US court ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, a pipeline company, for protests against the Dakota Access pipeline. The jury found Greenpeace USA primarily liable, with smaller portions assessed against related international and funding entities. Greenpeace plans to appeal.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 13:16

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay \$660 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Lawsuit

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, a decision Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate financial and operational consequences for Greenpeace resulting from the jury's decision in the Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over \$660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against the pipeline's construction. The damages are spread across three Greenpeace entities: Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International, and Greenpeace Fund Inc., with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest share. Greenpeace plans to appeal the verdict.

welt.de

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 01:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay Hundreds of Millions in Damages over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

A North Dakota court ordered Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer, the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline, hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for protesting the pipeline's construction on land sacred to Sioux tribes, raising concerns about free speech and environmental activism.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term impacts of this legal decision on the balance between corporate interests, environmental advocacy, and indigenous rights in the US?

The ruling against Greenpeace could set a precedent impacting future environmental activism, potentially chilling protests against energy infrastructure projects. The substantial damages awarded could financially strain Greenpeace and raise questions about the limits of free speech in the context of corporate litigation. The case may encourage other companies to pursue similar lawsuits.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 18, 04:11

Federal Agencies Reinstate Fired Workers, Place Them on Paid Leave

Following a court order, multiple federal agencies are reinstating approximately 6,000 terminated probationary workers but placing them on paid administrative leave, causing staffing shortages and hindering agency operations; a judge has questioned the legality of this action.

Federal Agencies Reinstate Fired Workers, Place Them on Paid Leave

Following a court order, multiple federal agencies are reinstating approximately 6,000 terminated probationary workers but placing them on paid administrative leave, causing staffing shortages and hindering agency operations; a judge has questioned the legality of this action.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Decent Work and Economic Growth

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the broader consequences of the agencies' decision to place reinstated workers on paid administrative leave?

This temporary reinstatement, while providing back pay, prevents workers from returning to their duties, creating staffing shortages and hindering agency functions. The judge's order aimed to restore services, but the administrative leave contradicts this goal, leading to inefficiency and potentially impacting public services like environmental protection and tax processing. This situation highlights the ongoing legal battle over the Trump administration's dismissal of probationary workers.

Showing 13 to 24 of 150 results