Tag #Defamation

Showing 109 to 120 of 240 results

us.cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 04:12

Palin's Defamation Lawsuit Against NYT Dismissed

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords; the jury found that the...

Palin's Defamation Lawsuit Against NYT Dismissed

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords; the jury found that the...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the jury's decision in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times?

A federal jury dismissed Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, marking the end of her second attempt to hold the newspaper accountable for an editorial published in 2017. The jury's decision came after less than a week of trial and affirms a key principle of American law protecting publishers from liability for honest mistakes. This ruling follows a previous dismissal of the case and a subsequent appeal.

nytimes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 20, 07:11

Drake Amends Lawsuit, Cites Super Bowl Performance as Amplifying Defamation

Rapper Drake amended his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG), claiming that Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LIX halftime performance of "Not Like Us", viewed by over 133 million people, reignited false accusations of pedophilia against him; the lawsuit alleges UMG promoted the song despite Drake...

Drake Amends Lawsuit, Cites Super Bowl Performance as Amplifying Defamation

Rapper Drake amended his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG), claiming that Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LIX halftime performance of "Not Like Us", viewed by over 133 million people, reignited false accusations of pedophilia against him; the lawsuit alleges UMG promoted the song despite Drake...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did UMG's actions following Drake's initial lawsuit contribute to the amplification of defamatory claims?

The lawsuit connects the Super Bowl performance to a surge in online threats against Drake and his family. Post-Super Bowl, "Not Like Us" reached No. 1 on Billboard's Top 100, with Spotify streams increasing 430 percent. This demonstrates a direct link between the performance and the renewed spread of defamatory claims, strengthening Drake's case against UMG.

nos.nl

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 17, 04:12

Civitas Christiana to Remove Posts About Author Pim Lammers After Court Case

Following a court case, the ultraconservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him, prompted by legal action from his publisher due to "multiple hate campaigns" and spread of "fak...

Civitas Christiana to Remove Posts About Author Pim Lammers After Court Case

Following a court case, the ultraconservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him, prompted by legal action from his publisher due to "multiple hate campaigns" and spread of "fak...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What broader implications does this case have for the spread of misinformation about authors and public events?

Civitas Christiana's actions prompted legal action from Singel Uitgeverijen, Lammers' publisher, due to "multiple hate campaigns" and the spread of "fake news." The court case resulted in Civitas Christiana agreeing to remove false information and abstain from repeating accusations. This demonstrates the legal recourse available to publishers against disinformation campaigns.

npr.org

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 13, 13:12

Palin's Defamation Retrial Against The New York Times Begins

A federal judge's procedural error in Sarah Palin's initial defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, which she lost, resulted in a retrial beginning Monday in Manhattan, focusing on a 2017 editorial falsely connecting Palin to a shooting; Palin seeks no monetary compensation.

Palin's Defamation Retrial Against The New York Times Begins

A federal judge's procedural error in Sarah Palin's initial defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, which she lost, resulted in a retrial beginning Monday in Manhattan, focusing on a 2017 editorial falsely connecting Palin to a shooting; Palin seeks no monetary compensation.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this case reflect broader trends in media accountability and defamation litigation?

The case could impact press freedoms established by a 1964 Supreme Court ruling, although Palin seeks no financial damages. The retrial follows similar defamation suits against media outlets, reflecting a shifting media landscape and increased litigation against news organizations.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 11, 01:16

Trump Defamation Lawsuit to Proceed: Central Park Five Case

A federal judge rejected President Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, who allege Trump falsely claimed they pleaded guilty and killed the victim in a 2024 presidential debate.

Trump Defamation Lawsuit to Proceed: Central Park Five Case

A federal judge rejected President Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, who allege Trump falsely claimed they pleaded guilty and killed the victim in a 2024 presidential debate.

Progress

16% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the judge's decision to allow the defamation lawsuit against President Trump to proceed?

President Trump's attempt to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five has failed. A federal judge allowed the case to proceed, rejecting Trump's claim that his statements during a 2024 debate were not defamatory. The lawsuit alleges Trump falsely stated the five men pleaded guilty and that a victim was killed.

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 10, 19:15

Judge Rejects Trump's Motion to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit Filed by Central Park Five

A federal judge rejected Donald Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, five Black and Hispanic men wrongly convicted and imprisoned for the 1989 rape of a white jogger in New York City, who are seeking monetary damages for reputational and emotional harms caus...

Judge Rejects Trump's Motion to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit Filed by Central Park Five

A federal judge rejected Donald Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, five Black and Hispanic men wrongly convicted and imprisoned for the 1989 rape of a white jogger in New York City, who are seeking monetary damages for reputational and emotional harms caus...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do Trump's past statements about the Central Park Five, including his call for the death penalty, relate to the current defamation lawsuit?

This ruling connects to broader concerns about the accountability of public figures for their statements. Trump's comments about the Central Park Five, falsely claiming they confessed and killed someone, are demonstrably false and caused significant harm to their reputations. The judge's decision highlights the potential legal ramifications for making false statements of fact, even if presented as opinions.

bbc.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 04:12

NYT Wins Defamation Case Against Sarah Palin

A Manhattan jury ruled in favor of the New York Times in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her rhetoric to the 2011 Arizona shooting; the jury found the Times did not act with actual malice.

NYT Wins Defamation Case Against Sarah Palin

A Manhattan jury ruled in favor of the New York Times in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her rhetoric to the 2011 Arizona shooting; the jury found the Times did not act with actual malice.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the initial 2017 editorial connect Sarah Palin's rhetoric to the Arizona shooting, and what role did the correction play in the legal proceedings?

The case highlights the high legal bar for defamation against public figures, requiring proof of "actual malice." The jury's decision reinforces the importance of this standard in protecting freedom of the press, even when errors are made. The Times corrected the editorial within 14 hours of publication.

theguardian.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 20, 19:14

Palin's Defamation Retrial Highlights Free Speech Concerns

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began in Manhattan on Monday, focusing on procedural errors from the 2022 trial where she lost, and the question of whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial incorrectly linking Palin to a mass shooting.

Palin's Defamation Retrial Highlights Free Speech Concerns

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began in Manhattan on Monday, focusing on procedural errors from the 2022 trial where she lost, and the question of whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial incorrectly linking Palin to a mass shooting.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the Palin retrial's outcome for free speech and media organizations?

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began this week in Manhattan. The retrial, ordered due to the original judge's procedural errors, focuses on whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked Palin to a mass shooting. The case's outcome could significantly impact free speech discourse, particularly concerning lawsuits against media outlets by public figures.

nos.nl

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 16, 22:14

Court Rules in Favor of Children's Book Author Pim Lammers Against Disinformation Campaign

Following a court case, the ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him; the decision comes after repeated smear campaigns and legal action by Lammer's publisher, Sing...

Court Rules in Favor of Children's Book Author Pim Lammers Against Disinformation Campaign

Following a court case, the ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him; the decision comes after repeated smear campaigns and legal action by Lammer's publisher, Sing...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the court ruling for Civitas Christiana and Pim Lammers?

The ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana has agreed to remove all posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and will not repeat accusations against him. This follows a summary court ruling last week. The agreement concludes a dispute where Civitas Christiana repeatedly targeted Lammers with unfounded accusations of pedophilia, culminating in a recent campaign.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 12, 04:10

Judge Rules Against Fox News Deposition of Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic Lawsuit

A New York judge ruled that Fox News cannot depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, but can depose his associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, who allegedly obtained information about Smartmatic's finances from the company's CEO. Fox News claims this information...

Judge Rules Against Fox News Deposition of Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic Lawsuit

A New York judge ruled that Fox News cannot depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, but can depose his associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, who allegedly obtained information about Smartmatic's finances from the company's CEO. Fox News claims this information...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the core legal dispute in the Smartmatic lawsuit against Fox News, and what is the immediate impact of the judge's ruling on the case?

In a Manhattan court, Judge Robert Reed ruled against Fox News' request to depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman, instead permitting the deposition of Hoffman's associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox. This decision follows Fox News' argument that Hoffman possessed relevant financial information about Smartmatic obtained from a meeting with the company's CEO. Smartmatic alleges Fox spread false claims about election rigging, while Fox maintains it reported newsworthy allegations.

euronews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 10, 16:12

German Editor Sentenced for Defamatory Meme of Interior Minister

A German court sentenced David Bendels, editor-in-chief of the AfD-affiliated Deutschland Kurier, to a seven-month suspended prison sentence and a €1,500 fine for posting a manipulated image of Interior Minister Nancy Faeser on X, depicting her with a sign reading "I hate freedom of speech," despite...

German Editor Sentenced for Defamatory Meme of Interior Minister

A German court sentenced David Bendels, editor-in-chief of the AfD-affiliated Deutschland Kurier, to a seven-month suspended prison sentence and a €1,500 fine for posting a manipulated image of Interior Minister Nancy Faeser on X, depicting her with a sign reading "I hate freedom of speech," despite...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the court justify its decision, and what factors contributed to the severity of the sentence imposed on Bendels?

The court in Bamberg, Germany, ruled that the manipulated image of Minister Faeser was not satire due to its context and lack of clear indicators. The court emphasized Faeser's right to protection from defamation, prioritizing personal rights over Bendels' claim of satirical intent. This ruling highlights the complexities of satire and defamation laws in Germany.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 8, 01:13

Judge Dismisses Defamation Lawsuit Against Mississippi Today

A Mississippi judge dismissed former Governor Phil Bryant's defamation lawsuit against Mississippi Today, a news outlet that won a Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on the misspending of $77 million in federal welfare funds; the judge ruled that the outlet engaged in constitutionally protected speech...

Judge Dismisses Defamation Lawsuit Against Mississippi Today

A Mississippi judge dismissed former Governor Phil Bryant's defamation lawsuit against Mississippi Today, a news outlet that won a Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on the misspending of $77 million in federal welfare funds; the judge ruled that the outlet engaged in constitutionally protected speech...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the judge's dismissal of former Governor Bryant's defamation lawsuit against Mississippi Today?

In a significant legal victory for Mississippi Today, a judge dismissed former Governor Phil Bryant's defamation lawsuit stemming from their Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting on a $77 million welfare scandal. The ruling stated that Mississippi Today engaged in constitutionally protected speech, rejecting Bryant's claims of slanderous comments made during public discussions of the investigation. Bryant's attorney plans to appeal.

Showing 109 to 120 of 240 results