Tag #Defamation

Showing 73 to 84 of 179 results

theglobeandmail.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 20, 04:12

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Greenpeace Ordered to Pay $666.9 Million in Dakota Access Pipeline Case

A North Dakota jury ruled that Greenpeace must pay Energy Transfer $666.9 million in damages for actions related to protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline's construction between 2016 and 2017, with Greenpeace USA bearing the largest portion of the fine, while Greenpeace plans to appeal.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Climate Action

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the $650 million verdict against Greenpeace, and how might this impact future environmental activism?

A North Dakota jury ordered Greenpeace to pay over $650 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access pipeline, for actions related to protests against its construction. Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal the verdict, emphasizing that its work will continue. The damages will be split among three Greenpeace entities.

cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 14, 19:15

Newsmax Settles Smartmatic Defamation Lawsuit for $40 Million

Newsmax paid \$40 million to settle a defamation lawsuit filed by Smartmatic, a voting technology company, over false claims of election rigging in the 2020 election; this follows a similar, larger settlement by Fox News.

Newsmax Settles Smartmatic Defamation Lawsuit for $40 Million

Newsmax paid \$40 million to settle a defamation lawsuit filed by Smartmatic, a voting technology company, over false claims of election rigging in the 2020 election; this follows a similar, larger settlement by Fox News.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term implications of these defamation lawsuits for news organizations and their coverage of elections?

This settlement could impact Newsmax's upcoming IPO, potentially influencing investor confidence and valuation. The ongoing Dominion lawsuit poses further financial risk for Newsmax, highlighting the significant legal and financial consequences of spreading election misinformation.

lexpress.fr

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 14, 22:08

False News Article Accusing Garrido and Corbière: Court Decision on May 12th

A Paris court will rule on May 12th on a case involving a false news article published by Le Point magazine, accusing LFI deputies Raquel Garrido and Alexis Corbière of exploiting an undocumented housekeeper; the investigation revealed a deliberate disinformation campaign orchestrated by a rival pol...

False News Article Accusing Garrido and Corbière: Court Decision on May 12th

A Paris court will rule on May 12th on a case involving a false news article published by Le Point magazine, accusing LFI deputies Raquel Garrido and Alexis Corbière of exploiting an undocumented housekeeper; the investigation revealed a deliberate disinformation campaign orchestrated by a rival pol...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What role did Jean-Christophe Lagarde and his associates play in the creation and publication of the false news article?

The case highlights the dangers of unchecked information and the responsibility of journalists to verify their sources. The article's retraction and the subsequent investigation revealed a deliberate attempt to smear the Garrido-Corbière couple, orchestrated by a rival politician (Jean-Christophe Lagarde), his driver (Rudy Succar), and a police contact (Noam Anouar).

elpais.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 12, 19:14

Spanish Court Upholds €3,000 Fine Against ABC for Falsely Linking Fighter to Prison Murder

Spain's Constitutional Court upheld a €3,000 fine against ABC newspaper for publishing an image of Muay Thai fighter Cristian Opazos in a news report about a 2018 prison murder, despite Opazos's lack of involvement; the court found ABC negligent in verifying information from a news agency, emphasizi...

Spanish Court Upholds €3,000 Fine Against ABC for Falsely Linking Fighter to Prison Murder

Spain's Constitutional Court upheld a €3,000 fine against ABC newspaper for publishing an image of Muay Thai fighter Cristian Opazos in a news report about a 2018 prison murder, despite Opazos's lack of involvement; the court found ABC negligent in verifying information from a news agency, emphasizi...

Progress

12% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Constitutional Court's application of the 'neutral reporting' doctrine influence its decision, and what are the implications for the use of agency information in news reporting?

The court rejected ABC's defense that it relied on a news agency and applied the 'neutral reporting' doctrine, stating that media outlets must exercise due diligence even when using agency material to avoid disseminating false or harmful information. This highlights the importance of verifying information, even from reputable sources, to protect individual rights.

cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 10, 13:10

Congresswoman Accuses Four Men of Non-Consensual Recording; One Denies Allegations

Rep. Nancy Mace accused four South Carolina men, including Brian Musgrave, of non-consensual recording of sex acts during a February House floor speech; Musgrave and two others deny the allegations, while one man couldn't be reached; SLED is investigating the primary accuser's ex-fiancé.

Congresswoman Accuses Four Men of Non-Consensual Recording; One Denies Allegations

Rep. Nancy Mace accused four South Carolina men, including Brian Musgrave, of non-consensual recording of sex acts during a February House floor speech; Musgrave and two others deny the allegations, while one man couldn't be reached; SLED is investigating the primary accuser's ex-fiancé.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate consequences resulted from Rep. Mace's public accusations against Brian Musgrave and others?

Rep. Nancy Mace publicly accused Brian Musgrave and three other men of recording sex acts without consent during a House floor speech, causing significant reputational damage. Musgrave and two others deny the allegations; one man could not be reached. SLED is investigating the accusations against Mace's ex-fiancé, Patrick Bryant, the central figure in the allegations.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 4, 19:16

Jay-Z Sues Accuser for Defamation

Music mogul Jay-Z filed a defamation lawsuit against an anonymous woman in Alabama federal court who accused him of rape when she was 13, claiming the accusations are false and financially motivated; the woman's previous lawsuit against Jay-Z and Diddy was dropped last month.

Jay-Z Sues Accuser for Defamation

Music mogul Jay-Z filed a defamation lawsuit against an anonymous woman in Alabama federal court who accused him of rape when she was 13, claiming the accusations are false and financially motivated; the woman's previous lawsuit against Jay-Z and Diddy was dropped last month.

Progress

64% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Jay-Z's defamation lawsuit against the anonymous woman?

Jay-Z is suing an anonymous woman for defamation, alleging she falsely accused him of rape for financial gain. The woman previously filed a lawsuit against Jay-Z and Diddy, which was later dropped. Jay-Z claims the woman admitted the assault didn't happen.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 15, 04:10

SC Businessman Sues Rep. Mace for Defamation

South Carolina businessman Brian Musgrave is suing Rep. Nancy Mace for defamation after she accused him on the House floor of being part of a sex trafficking ring and filming non-consensual nude videos, claims he denies; the suit challenges the legal limits of the Speech and Debate Clause.

SC Businessman Sues Rep. Mace for Defamation

South Carolina businessman Brian Musgrave is suing Rep. Nancy Mace for defamation after she accused him on the House floor of being part of a sex trafficking ring and filming non-consensual nude videos, claims he denies; the suit challenges the legal limits of the Speech and Debate Clause.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the central claims in Brian Musgrave's defamation lawsuit against Rep. Nancy Mace, and what are the potential legal ramifications?

South Carolina businessman Brian Musgrave is suing Rep. Nancy Mace for defamation following her accusations of his involvement in sex trafficking and filming non-consensual nude videos. Musgrave denies all allegations, claiming he was not involved and did not have access to the hidden camera Mace referenced. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 14, 07:13

Newsmax to Pay Smartmatic $40 Million in Election Defamation Settlement

Newsmax will pay Smartmatic $40 million to settle a defamation lawsuit over false claims that Smartmatic voting machines manipulated the 2020 presidential election; $20 million has already been paid.

Newsmax to Pay Smartmatic $40 Million in Election Defamation Settlement

Newsmax will pay Smartmatic $40 million to settle a defamation lawsuit over false claims that Smartmatic voting machines manipulated the 2020 presidential election; $20 million has already been paid.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key financial terms of the Newsmax-Smartmatic settlement, and what immediate consequences does it have for Newsmax?

Newsmax agreed to pay Smartmatic $40 million to settle a defamation lawsuit stemming from false claims about election manipulation. $20 million has already been paid, with the remainder due before July. This eliminates potential future legal expenses for Newsmax.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 13, 22:12

Indian Government Revokes US Journalist's OCI Card After Critical Appin Report

US journalist Raphael Satter's Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card was revoked in December 2023 due to his Reuters article on Indian cybersecurity firm Appin, which the government deemed maliciously damaging to its reputation; Satter, who denies conducting journalism in India, has filed a lawsuit i...

Indian Government Revokes US Journalist's OCI Card After Critical Appin Report

US journalist Raphael Satter's Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card was revoked in December 2023 due to his Reuters article on Indian cybersecurity firm Appin, which the government deemed maliciously damaging to its reputation; Satter, who denies conducting journalism in India, has filed a lawsuit i...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the potential long-term implications of this case for press freedom in India and the international perception of its human rights record?

This case highlights a worrying trend of the Indian government using OCI revocation to silence dissent. The lack of transparency and due process in these actions, coupled with the timing relative to the Appin defamation case, points to a broader strategy to suppress critical journalism. Future implications include potential chilling effects on investigative reporting on India and further international scrutiny of its human rights record.

foxnews.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Mar 11, 19:17

Judge Rejects Pulitzer Board's Bid to Halt Trump's Defamation Lawsuit

A Florida judge denied the Pulitzer Prize Board's request to temporarily halt Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against them, stemming from the 2018 Pulitzer Prizes awarded to the New York Times and Washington Post for their coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election; the judge's ...

Judge Rejects Pulitzer Board's Bid to Halt Trump's Defamation Lawsuit

A Florida judge denied the Pulitzer Prize Board's request to temporarily halt Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against them, stemming from the 2018 Pulitzer Prizes awarded to the New York Times and Washington Post for their coverage of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election; the judge's ...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What arguments did the Pulitzer Prize Board present to justify a temporary stay, and how did the judge respond to those arguments?

This ruling allows Trump's defamation suit against the Pulitzer Prize Board to move forward, focusing on their 2018 awards to the New York Times and Washington Post for coverage of alleged Trump-Russia collusion. The judge's decision rejects the board's argument that a temporary stay was needed due to Trump's presidential duties. The lawsuit challenges the accuracy and fairness of the award-winning reporting.

elmundo.es

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 5, 16:13

Jay-Z Countersues Accuser and Lawyers, Alleging False Rape Claims

Jay-Z is countersuing a woman who accused him of rape and her lawyers in Alabama federal court, alleging they knew the accusations—related to a larger case against Sean Combs—were false after she admitted to fabricating the story.

Jay-Z Countersues Accuser and Lawyers, Alleging False Rape Claims

Jay-Z is countersuing a woman who accused him of rape and her lawyers in Alabama federal court, alleging they knew the accusations—related to a larger case against Sean Combs—were false after she admitted to fabricating the story.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of Jay-Z's countersuit against his accuser and her lawyers?

Jay-Z is countersuing a woman who accused him of rape, and her lawyers, alleging they knew the claims were false. The lawsuit, filed in Alabama, claims the woman admitted to fabricating the story. The woman initially accused Jay-Z and Sean Combs of rape in a case related to other accusations against Combs.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Mar 4, 22:09

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Conviction, Citing Discrepancies in Court Findings

A lawyer is appealing a court's finding that Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins, arguing the court's findings differed from evidence presented and that Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness; the court found Lehrmann guilty but the description of the assault differed from media accounts.

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Conviction, Citing Discrepancies in Court Findings

A lawyer is appealing a court's finding that Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins, arguing the court's findings differed from evidence presented and that Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness; the court found Lehrmann guilty but the description of the assault differed from media accounts.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do discrepancies between the court's findings and the media's portrayal of the assault affect the legal arguments in Lehrmann's appeal?

The appeal focuses on discrepancies between the court's description of the rape and the account in a Network Ten interview. The lawyer argues the court created its own case theory, which was never presented to Lehrmann for response, thus violating his procedural fairness rights. This highlights concerns about the reliability of determining facts in complex sexual assault cases.

Showing 73 to 84 of 179 results