Tag #Defamation

Showing 13 to 24 of 243 results

english.elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 8, 22:21

Federal Appeals Court Upholds $83.3 Million Defamation Fine Against Trump

A federal appeals court upheld an $83.3 million defamation fine against Donald Trump for his statements about E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of rape; the court rejected Trump's claim of presidential immunity.

Federal Appeals Court Upholds $83.3 Million Defamation Fine Against Trump

A federal appeals court upheld an $83.3 million defamation fine against Donald Trump for his statements about E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of rape; the court rejected Trump's claim of presidential immunity.

Progress

28% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What broader legal and political implications arise from this ruling?

This ruling establishes that presidential immunity does not extend to defamation cases arising from actions before, during, or after a president's term. It also highlights the legal consequences for public figures making false statements, even if those statements were made while in office.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 5, 04:18

Australian Media Under Fire for Bias and Misinformation

Several Australian news outlets face criticism for broadcasting neo-Nazi propaganda, promoting conspiracy theories, running scam ads, and publishing offensive articles, prompting complaints and legal action.

Australian Media Under Fire for Bias and Misinformation

Several Australian news outlets face criticism for broadcasting neo-Nazi propaganda, promoting conspiracy theories, running scam ads, and publishing offensive articles, prompting complaints and legal action.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What conspiracy theory did news.com.au promote, and what is the evidence supporting or refuting it?

News.com.au published a nearly 2,000-word article promoting a conspiracy theory that Sewell and the National Socialist Network are paid actors working for the Labor government. This theory originated from a Senate speech by Alex Antic, lacking any substantial evidence. The article's prominence highlights the platform's contribution to misinformation.

taz.de

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Sep 2, 22:21

German Court Fines Right-Wing Influencer for Insulting Journalist

A German court ordered right-wing influencer Anthony Lee to pay a fine for insulting journalist Jost Maurin, highlighting the legal repercussions of online harassment and the importance of protecting journalistic integrity.

German Court Fines Right-Wing Influencer for Insulting Journalist

A German court ordered right-wing influencer Anthony Lee to pay a fine for insulting journalist Jost Maurin, highlighting the legal repercussions of online harassment and the importance of protecting journalistic integrity.

Progress

20% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific actions led to the legal action against Lee and his colleague Christian Beißner?

In three YouTube videos spanning over a year, Lee repeatedly insulted Maurin using terms like "Arsch" ("ass"), "Blödmann" ("idiot"), and more, while Beißner used similar insults. These actions crossed the line of legitimate criticism, prompting Maurin to file a complaint.

us.cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Aug 30, 07:15

Dershowitz Loses Defamation Lawsuit Appeal Against CNN

A US appeals court upheld the dismissal of Alan Dershowitz's defamation lawsuit against CNN, ruling he failed to prove "actual malice" in their coverage of his remarks during Trump's impeachment trial.

Dershowitz Loses Defamation Lawsuit Appeal Against CNN

A US appeals court upheld the dismissal of Alan Dershowitz's defamation lawsuit against CNN, ruling he failed to prove "actual malice" in their coverage of his remarks during Trump's impeachment trial.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What arguments did Dershowitz and the judges make regarding the legal basis for the decision?

Dershowitz argued the 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan ruling, which protects the press from defamation unless there's actual malice, was applied too broadly. Judge Lagoa, while upholding the dismissal, concurred that CNN's coverage likely constituted defamation under a common understanding of the term, but she felt bound by Sullivan. Judge Wilson, in contrast, defended Sullivan and its press protections.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 27, 07:18

Reynolds v. Higgins Defamation Case Nears Judgment

A Western Australian court is set to deliver its judgment on Wednesday in a defamation case brought by former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds against Brittany Higgins, following a five-week trial that re-examined Higgins' alleged 2019 rape and the subsequent media coverage.

Reynolds v. Higgins Defamation Case Nears Judgment

A Western Australian court is set to deliver its judgment on Wednesday in a defamation case brought by former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds against Brittany Higgins, following a five-week trial that re-examined Higgins' alleged 2019 rape and the subsequent media coverage.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the alleged actions of Brittany Higgins and her husband contribute to the complexities of the defamation case?

Reynolds alleges Higgins and her husband fabricated a story of political cover-up, aiming to damage Reynolds' reputation. This involved allegedly courting journalists with their account while Higgins still worked for another senator. The trial highlighted the intersection of politics, media, and a sexual assault allegation.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 26, 22:20

Reynolds v. Higgins Defamation Ruling Imminent

A judge will decide on Wednesday whether former Australian Defence Minister Linda Reynolds' defamation case against Brittany Higgins, her former staffer, is successful, a ruling stemming from social media posts about Higgins' rape allegation against a colleague, with implications for freedom of spee...

Reynolds v. Higgins Defamation Ruling Imminent

A judge will decide on Wednesday whether former Australian Defence Minister Linda Reynolds' defamation case against Brittany Higgins, her former staffer, is successful, a ruling stemming from social media posts about Higgins' rape allegation against a colleague, with implications for freedom of spee...

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the primary legal question before the court and what are the potential impacts of the ruling on the handling of sexual assault allegations within political institutions?

Linda Reynolds, former Australian Defence Minister, is awaiting a defamation ruling against Brittany Higgins, her former staffer, regarding social media posts. The case, stemming from Higgins' rape allegation against a fellow staffer, has had significant political and personal repercussions, with a judge deciding whether Higgins' posts were defamatory and whether Reynolds' reputation was damaged.

elpais.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Sep 6, 10:16

Conspiracy Theories and the Macron Case: A Deeper Look

The Macron's are suing Candace Owens for spreading the false conspiracy theory that Brigitte Macron is a man, highlighting the destructive nature of such rumors and their potential to cause humiliation.

Conspiracy Theories and the Macron Case: A Deeper Look

The Macron's are suing Candace Owens for spreading the false conspiracy theory that Brigitte Macron is a man, highlighting the destructive nature of such rumors and their potential to cause humiliation.

Progress

20% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How do conspiracy theories, beyond this specific case, contribute to societal harm?

Conspiracy theories often justify cruelty towards specific groups. For example, theories about the 'great replacement' fuel inhumane treatment of immigrants, while those targeting LGBTQ+ individuals aim to legitimize prejudice. Antisemitic theories often center around figures like George Soros.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Sep 5, 10:20

High Court Rejects Roberts-Smith Appeal; Rinehart's Potential Funding Scrutinized

Australia's High Court dismissed Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation appeal, prompting media outlets to investigate whether Gina Rinehart, who publicly supported him, funded his legal battles costing over \$35 million.

High Court Rejects Roberts-Smith Appeal; Rinehart's Potential Funding Scrutinized

Australia's High Court dismissed Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation appeal, prompting media outlets to investigate whether Gina Rinehart, who publicly supported him, funded his legal battles costing over \$35 million.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the central issue in the ongoing legal dispute surrounding Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation case?

The main issue is whether Gina Rinehart, Australia's richest person, financed Roberts-Smith's failed appeal against defamation claims. Media outlets are investigating this, having issued a subpoena to Rinehart for financial documents related to payments made to Roberts-Smith between June 1 and July 22, 2024.

lemonde.fr

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Sep 2, 22:21

French National Rally Deputy Fined for Insulting Colleague

Laurent Jacobelli, a French National Rally (RN) deputy, was fined €300 suspended sentence for insulting fellow deputy Belkhir Belhaddad, calling him "racaille" (rabble) during a ministerial visit in 2023.

French National Rally Deputy Fined for Insulting Colleague

Laurent Jacobelli, a French National Rally (RN) deputy, was fined €300 suspended sentence for insulting fellow deputy Belkhir Belhaddad, calling him "racaille" (rabble) during a ministerial visit in 2023.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What were the charges against Laurent Jacobelli, and what was the outcome of the trial?

Jacobelli was charged with non-public defamation and outrage against fellow deputy Belkhir Belhaddad. The court found him guilty and imposed a €300 suspended fine and €150 in damages to Belhaddad. He was acquitted of the charge of non-public insult based on origin.

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 27, 07:18

Reynolds Wins Defamation Case Against Higgins, Awarded \$340,000

A Western Australian court awarded former Senator Linda Reynolds over \$340,000 in damages in a defamation case against Brittany Higgins and her husband, David Sharaz, for defamatory social media posts; the ruling has major financial implications for Higgins and Sharaz.

Reynolds Wins Defamation Case Against Higgins, Awarded \$340,000

A Western Australian court awarded former Senator Linda Reynolds over \$340,000 in damages in a defamation case against Brittany Higgins and her husband, David Sharaz, for defamatory social media posts; the ruling has major financial implications for Higgins and Sharaz.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the court's decision balance freedom of speech with the protection of reputation in this high-profile case?

The case highlights the complexities of defamation law in the context of social media and political discourse. The court's decision balances freedom of speech with the protection of reputation. The substantial damages awarded underscore the potential consequences of publishing false or misleading information online.

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 27, 07:17

Reynolds Wins Defamation Case Against Higgins

A court ruled that Brittany Higgins defamed former Australian Senator Linda Reynolds in two social media posts related to a 2021 rape allegation, awarding Reynolds A$315,000 in damages. The verdict is part of a larger legal battle stemming from the initial rape claim.

Reynolds Wins Defamation Case Against Higgins

A court ruled that Brittany Higgins defamed former Australian Senator Linda Reynolds in two social media posts related to a 2021 rape allegation, awarding Reynolds A$315,000 in damages. The verdict is part of a larger legal battle stemming from the initial rape claim.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the initial rape allegations made by Brittany Higgins against Bruce Lehrmann impact the legal proceedings and public discourse in Australia?

This verdict follows a series of legal battles stemming from Higgins' 2021 rape allegation. The case highlights the complexities and consequences of public accusations, particularly within the political sphere, underscoring the tension between free speech and reputational harm. The ruling adds another layer to the ongoing debate surrounding the handling of sexual assault claims in Australia.

theguardian.com

🌐 90% Global Worthiness

Aug 22, 19:19

Guardian Wins Defamation Case: Noel Clarke's Misconduct Reporting Vindicated

A British high court ruled that the Guardian's reporting on Noel Clarke's sexual misconduct was true and in the public interest, vindicating the accounts of over 20 women who accused the actor of various forms of harassment and bullying between 2004 and 2019.

Guardian Wins Defamation Case: Noel Clarke's Misconduct Reporting Vindicated

A British high court ruled that the Guardian's reporting on Noel Clarke's sexual misconduct was true and in the public interest, vindicating the accounts of over 20 women who accused the actor of various forms of harassment and bullying between 2004 and 2019.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Guardian's investigative process and the judge's ruling address the challenges of reporting on sexual misconduct allegations?

The Guardian's comprehensive investigation, involving over 100 sources and testimony from 26 witnesses, demonstrates the challenges and importance of reporting on sexual misconduct. The judge praised the reporters' rigorous fact-checking and corroboration efforts, highlighting the extensive work undertaken to substantiate the allegations. The case underscores the systemic issues faced by women reporting sexual harassment, especially when the alleged perpetrator holds significant power within their industry.

Showing 13 to 24 of 243 results