Tag #Defamation

Showing 61 to 72 of 195 results

kathimerini.gr

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 29, 16:13

Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of ...

Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of ...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate consequences resulted from the heated exchange between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis during the Parliament session?

A heated exchange occurred in the Greek Parliament between Health Minister Ad. Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis during a bill's discussion. Georgiadis mentioned an upcoming defamation lawsuit against Polakis, highlighting Polakis's multiple postponements and challenging him to attend court. Polakis responded by criticizing Georgiadis's past actions and the lawsuit's merit.", A2="The conflict stemmed from accusations by Polakis against Georgiadis, concerning alleged favoritism towards a specific investor. Georgiadis defended his actions, citing the investor's current imprisonment and the dismissal of previous investigations. This incident highlights deep-seated political divisions and ongoing legal battles within the Greek political landscape.", A3="The clash foreshadows increased political tension and legal ramifications. Polakis's defiance and Georgiadis's forceful response signal a potential escalation of their conflict. This event underscores broader issues of accountability and transparency within Greek politics and the judiciary.", Q1="What immediate consequences resulted from the heated exchange between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis during the Parliament session?", Q2="What are the underlying causes of the conflict between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis, and what broader implications does it have for Greek politics?", Q3="What are the potential long-term implications of this incident, considering its impact on public trust and the legal processes involved?", ShortDescription="Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of corruption and mismanagement.", ShortTitle="Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange")) # Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 01:13

Palin Loses Second Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that the paper later corrected. The jury sided with the Times, reaffirming legal protections for publishers who make h...

Palin Loses Second Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that the paper later corrected. The jury sided with the Times, reaffirming legal protections for publishers who make h...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the case reflect broader trends in media accountability and public trust in news organizations?

The case highlights the ongoing tension between public figures and news organizations, particularly in the context of declining trust in media. Palin's lawsuit, initially filed in 2017, alleged the Times incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords. The Times issued a correction, but Palin pursued legal action, arguing defamation. The verdict reinforces the legal protections afforded to publishers for honest errors, even amidst a climate of increased scrutiny of the media.

bbc.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 04:12

NYT Wins Defamation Case Against Sarah Palin

A Manhattan jury ruled in favor of the New York Times in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her rhetoric to the 2011 Arizona shooting; the jury found the Times did not act with actual malice.

NYT Wins Defamation Case Against Sarah Palin

A Manhattan jury ruled in favor of the New York Times in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her rhetoric to the 2011 Arizona shooting; the jury found the Times did not act with actual malice.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the initial 2017 editorial connect Sarah Palin's rhetoric to the Arizona shooting, and what role did the correction play in the legal proceedings?

The case highlights the high legal bar for defamation against public figures, requiring proof of "actual malice." The jury's decision reinforces the importance of this standard in protecting freedom of the press, even when errors are made. The Times corrected the editorial within 14 hours of publication.

theguardian.com

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 20, 19:14

Palin's Defamation Retrial Highlights Free Speech Concerns

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began in Manhattan on Monday, focusing on procedural errors from the 2022 trial where she lost, and the question of whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial incorrectly linking Palin to a mass shooting.

Palin's Defamation Retrial Highlights Free Speech Concerns

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began in Manhattan on Monday, focusing on procedural errors from the 2022 trial where she lost, and the question of whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial incorrectly linking Palin to a mass shooting.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the Palin retrial's outcome for free speech and media organizations?

Sarah Palin's defamation retrial against the New York Times began this week in Manhattan. The retrial, ordered due to the original judge's procedural errors, focuses on whether the Times acted with actual malice in a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked Palin to a mass shooting. The case's outcome could significantly impact free speech discourse, particularly concerning lawsuits against media outlets by public figures.

nos.nl

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 16, 22:14

Court Rules in Favor of Children's Book Author Pim Lammers Against Disinformation Campaign

Following a court case, the ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him; the decision comes after repeated smear campaigns and legal action by Lammer's publisher, Sing...

Court Rules in Favor of Children's Book Author Pim Lammers Against Disinformation Campaign

Following a court case, the ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him; the decision comes after repeated smear campaigns and legal action by Lammer's publisher, Sing...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the court ruling for Civitas Christiana and Pim Lammers?

The ultra-conservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana has agreed to remove all posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and will not repeat accusations against him. This follows a summary court ruling last week. The agreement concludes a dispute where Civitas Christiana repeatedly targeted Lammers with unfounded accusations of pedophilia, culminating in a recent campaign.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 12, 04:10

Judge Rules Against Fox News Deposition of Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic Lawsuit

A New York judge ruled that Fox News cannot depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, but can depose his associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, who allegedly obtained information about Smartmatic's finances from the company's CEO. Fox News claims this information...

Judge Rules Against Fox News Deposition of Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic Lawsuit

A New York judge ruled that Fox News cannot depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit, but can depose his associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, who allegedly obtained information about Smartmatic's finances from the company's CEO. Fox News claims this information...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the core legal dispute in the Smartmatic lawsuit against Fox News, and what is the immediate impact of the judge's ruling on the case?

In a Manhattan court, Judge Robert Reed ruled against Fox News' request to depose Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman, instead permitting the deposition of Hoffman's associate, Dmitri Mehlhorn, in Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox. This decision follows Fox News' argument that Hoffman possessed relevant financial information about Smartmatic obtained from a meeting with the company's CEO. Smartmatic alleges Fox spread false claims about election rigging, while Fox maintains it reported newsworthy allegations.

us.cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 04:12

Palin's Defamation Lawsuit Against NYT Dismissed

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords; the jury found that the...

Palin's Defamation Lawsuit Against NYT Dismissed

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords; the jury found that the...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the jury's decision in Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times?

A federal jury dismissed Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, marking the end of her second attempt to hold the newspaper accountable for an editorial published in 2017. The jury's decision came after less than a week of trial and affirms a key principle of American law protecting publishers from liability for honest mistakes. This ruling follows a previous dismissal of the case and a subsequent appeal.

npr.org

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 01:14

Jury Rules in Favor of New York Times in Palin Defamation Case

A New York jury found The New York Times not liable for defamation in Sarah Palin's lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that contained an error about her political action committee and the 2011 Arizona shooting; the Times quickly corrected the error, but Palin claimed reputational harm.

Jury Rules in Favor of New York Times in Palin Defamation Case

A New York jury found The New York Times not liable for defamation in Sarah Palin's lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that contained an error about her political action committee and the 2011 Arizona shooting; the Times quickly corrected the error, but Palin claimed reputational harm.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the jury's verdict in the Sarah Palin defamation lawsuit against The New York Times?

A New York jury ruled that The New York Times did not defame Sarah Palin in a 2017 editorial containing a factual error. This decision follows a 2022 ruling, but an appeals court reinstated the lawsuit. Palin expressed relief and plans to continue advocating for press accountability.

nytimes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 20, 07:11

Drake Amends Lawsuit, Cites Super Bowl Performance as Amplifying Defamation

Rapper Drake amended his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG), claiming that Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LIX halftime performance of "Not Like Us", viewed by over 133 million people, reignited false accusations of pedophilia against him; the lawsuit alleges UMG promoted the song despite Drake...

Drake Amends Lawsuit, Cites Super Bowl Performance as Amplifying Defamation

Rapper Drake amended his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG), claiming that Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LIX halftime performance of "Not Like Us", viewed by over 133 million people, reignited false accusations of pedophilia against him; the lawsuit alleges UMG promoted the song despite Drake...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did UMG's actions following Drake's initial lawsuit contribute to the amplification of defamatory claims?

The lawsuit connects the Super Bowl performance to a surge in online threats against Drake and his family. Post-Super Bowl, "Not Like Us" reached No. 1 on Billboard's Top 100, with Spotify streams increasing 430 percent. This demonstrates a direct link between the performance and the renewed spread of defamatory claims, strengthening Drake's case against UMG.

nos.nl

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 17, 04:12

Civitas Christiana to Remove Posts About Author Pim Lammers After Court Case

Following a court case, the ultraconservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him, prompted by legal action from his publisher due to "multiple hate campaigns" and spread of "fak...

Civitas Christiana to Remove Posts About Author Pim Lammers After Court Case

Following a court case, the ultraconservative Catholic foundation Civitas Christiana agreed to remove all online posts about children's book author Pim Lammers and cease repeating accusations against him, prompted by legal action from his publisher due to "multiple hate campaigns" and spread of "fak...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What broader implications does this case have for the spread of misinformation about authors and public events?

Civitas Christiana's actions prompted legal action from Singel Uitgeverijen, Lammers' publisher, due to "multiple hate campaigns" and the spread of "fake news." The court case resulted in Civitas Christiana agreeing to remove false information and abstain from repeating accusations. This demonstrates the legal recourse available to publishers against disinformation campaigns.

npr.org

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 13, 13:12

Palin's Defamation Retrial Against The New York Times Begins

A federal judge's procedural error in Sarah Palin's initial defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, which she lost, resulted in a retrial beginning Monday in Manhattan, focusing on a 2017 editorial falsely connecting Palin to a shooting; Palin seeks no monetary compensation.

Palin's Defamation Retrial Against The New York Times Begins

A federal judge's procedural error in Sarah Palin's initial defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, which she lost, resulted in a retrial beginning Monday in Manhattan, focusing on a 2017 editorial falsely connecting Palin to a shooting; Palin seeks no monetary compensation.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does this case reflect broader trends in media accountability and defamation litigation?

The case could impact press freedoms established by a 1964 Supreme Court ruling, although Palin seeks no financial damages. The retrial follows similar defamation suits against media outlets, reflecting a shifting media landscape and increased litigation against news organizations.

cbsnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Apr 11, 01:16

Trump Defamation Lawsuit to Proceed: Central Park Five Case

A federal judge rejected President Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, who allege Trump falsely claimed they pleaded guilty and killed the victim in a 2024 presidential debate.

Trump Defamation Lawsuit to Proceed: Central Park Five Case

A federal judge rejected President Trump's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five, who allege Trump falsely claimed they pleaded guilty and killed the victim in a 2024 presidential debate.

Progress

16% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the judge's decision to allow the defamation lawsuit against President Trump to proceed?

President Trump's attempt to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by the Central Park Five has failed. A federal judge allowed the case to proceed, rejecting Trump's claim that his statements during a 2024 debate were not defamatory. The lawsuit alleges Trump falsely stated the five men pleaded guilty and that a victim was killed.

Showing 61 to 72 of 195 results