Tag #Defamation

Showing 37 to 48 of 180 results

elpais.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 11, 10:10

Far-Right MEP Incites Violence, Faces Multiple Lawsuits

Alvise Pérez, a far-right MEP, incited violence against two colleagues who voted for the EU's rearmament plan, leading to a police complaint and highlighting his history of online harassment and legal battles.

Far-Right MEP Incites Violence, Faces Multiple Lawsuits

Alvise Pérez, a far-right MEP, incited violence against two colleagues who voted for the EU's rearmament plan, leading to a police complaint and highlighting his history of online harassment and legal battles.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How has Pérez's use of parliamentary immunity influenced his legal vulnerabilities and political maneuvering?

Pérez's actions reveal a pattern of using online platforms to spread misinformation and harass his political opponents. His parliamentary immunity has shielded him from prosecution, but recent court cases show that he has been ordered to pay significant fines for defamation and the harassment of a prosecutor. This pattern suggests a strategy of using the European Parliament platform to deflect legal action.

cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 10, 07:10

Swift Subpoenaed in Lively-Baldoni Defamation Case

Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed in a defamation countersuit between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni related to the film "It Ends With Us," despite only licensing a song for the movie; Lively accuses Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation, while Baldoni countersues for $400 million, claiming d...

Swift Subpoenaed in Lively-Baldoni Defamation Case

Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed in a defamation countersuit between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni related to the film "It Ends With Us," despite only licensing a song for the movie; Lively accuses Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation, while Baldoni countersues for $400 million, claiming d...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the central conflict in the legal dispute involving Taylor Swift, Blake Lively, and Justin Baldoni?

Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed in the defamation countersuit between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Swift's only connection to the film "It Ends With Us" was licensing the song "My Tears Ricochet," a fact her spokesperson emphasized to CNN. This subpoena is seen by Swift's representatives as an attempt to generate publicity rather than focus on the case's merits.

smh.com.au

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 9, 10:14

Funeral Director Defamation Trial Exposes Substandard Practices

A defamation trial against funeral director Peter Tziotzis revealed allegations of misconduct, including improper body handling, theft of jewelry from the deceased Helen Moraitis, and operating a substandard funeral home with bodies stored improperly; Tziotzis denies these claims.

Funeral Director Defamation Trial Exposes Substandard Practices

A defamation trial against funeral director Peter Tziotzis revealed allegations of misconduct, including improper body handling, theft of jewelry from the deceased Helen Moraitis, and operating a substandard funeral home with bodies stored improperly; Tziotzis denies these claims.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Good Health and Well-being

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the long-term implications of this case for the funeral industry, including potential changes in regulation, consumer protection, and public trust?

This defamation trial exposes systemic issues within the funeral industry, specifically concerning inadequate regulation and oversight. The case's outcome will impact future practices and may lead to increased scrutiny of funeral homes. The broader implications involve consumer protection and ensuring ethical handling of deceased individuals.

theguardian.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 6, 13:16

Seven Network Sues Former Producer for Alleged Leaks and Defamation

Seven Network is suing former Spotlight producer Taylor Auerbach for allegedly leaking confidential information and disparaging the network following a dispute with colleague Steve Jackson, claiming his actions were motivated by "hate", while Auerbach claims self-defense against false accusations.

Seven Network Sues Former Producer for Alleged Leaks and Defamation

Seven Network is suing former Spotlight producer Taylor Auerbach for allegedly leaking confidential information and disparaging the network following a dispute with colleague Steve Jackson, claiming his actions were motivated by "hate", while Auerbach claims self-defense against false accusations.

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key allegations against Taylor Auerbach, and what are the potential consequences for him and Seven Network?

Taylor Auerbach, a former Seven Network producer, is being sued by Seven for allegedly leaking confidential information and disparaging the network. Seven claims Auerbach acted out of "hate" for a colleague, Steve Jackson, leaking details of Seven's dealings with Bruce Lehrmann and circulating a photograph of a vulnerable woman. Auerbach counters that he was defending himself against false accusations.

t24.com.tr

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 30, 10:11

Baykar Chairman Sues Citizen for Drone Criticism After Earthquake

Selçuk Bayraktar, chairman of Baykar, is suing Aydın Aydoğan for 150,000 lira after Aydoğan's social media posts criticized the performance of Baykar drones during the February 6, 2023, earthquakes, alleging insufficient functionality. Bayraktar claims this caused him reputational harm.

Baykar Chairman Sues Citizen for Drone Criticism After Earthquake

Selçuk Bayraktar, chairman of Baykar, is suing Aydın Aydoğan for 150,000 lira after Aydoğan's social media posts criticized the performance of Baykar drones during the February 6, 2023, earthquakes, alleging insufficient functionality. Bayraktar claims this caused him reputational harm.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate impacts of this lawsuit on public perception of Baykar and the use of drones in disaster relief?

Selçuk Bayraktar, chairman of Baykar, filed a 150,000 lira lawsuit against Aydın Aydoğan, who claimed Baykar drones malfunctioned during the February 6 earthquake. Aydoğan's social media posts criticized the drones' performance, alleging insufficient functionality. Bayraktar asserts that this caused reputational damage.

cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 01:13

Palin Loses Second Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that the paper later corrected. The jury sided with the Times, reaffirming legal protections for publishers who make h...

Palin Loses Second Defamation Lawsuit Against New York Times

A federal jury in New York dismissed Sarah Palin's second defamation lawsuit against The New York Times on Tuesday, ending her eight-year legal battle stemming from a 2017 editorial that the paper later corrected. The jury sided with the Times, reaffirming legal protections for publishers who make h...

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does the case reflect broader trends in media accountability and public trust in news organizations?

The case highlights the ongoing tension between public figures and news organizations, particularly in the context of declining trust in media. Palin's lawsuit, initially filed in 2017, alleged the Times incorrectly linked her political action committee to the 2011 shooting of Gabby Giffords. The Times issued a correction, but Palin pursued legal action, arguing defamation. The verdict reinforces the legal protections afforded to publishers for honest errors, even amidst a climate of increased scrutiny of the media.

edition.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 10, 10:12

Taylor Swift Subpoenaed in Lively-Baldoni Defamation Case

Singer Taylor Swift was subpoenaed in a $400 million defamation countersuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds by "It Ends With Us" director Justin Baldoni; Swift's only contribution was licensing a song for the film, prompting accusations of tabloid tactics and distraction from the core sexual ...

Taylor Swift Subpoenaed in Lively-Baldoni Defamation Case

Singer Taylor Swift was subpoenaed in a $400 million defamation countersuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds by "It Ends With Us" director Justin Baldoni; Swift's only contribution was licensing a song for the film, prompting accusations of tabloid tactics and distraction from the core sexual ...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the significance of Taylor Swift's subpoena in the Lively-Baldoni defamation case?

Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed in the defamation countersuit between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Swift's involvement is limited to licensing the song "My Tears Ricochet" for the film "It Ends With Us." A spokesperson denied any further involvement, stating Swift was not on set and only saw the film weeks after release.

us.cnn.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

May 9, 07:19

Lively to Testify in Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Baldoni

Blake Lively will testify in her sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, which is set for trial in March 2026, while Baldoni counters with a $400 million defamation suit against Lively and Ryan Reynolds, claiming they damaged his reputation and interfered with the productio...

Lively to Testify in Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Baldoni

Blake Lively will testify in her sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, which is set for trial in March 2026, while Baldoni counters with a $400 million defamation suit against Lively and Ryan Reynolds, claiming they damaged his reputation and interfered with the productio...

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What role does Ryan Reynolds play in this legal dispute, and what is the likelihood of his testimony at the trial?

This case involves claims of sexual harassment and retaliation by Lively against Baldoni, stemming from their collaboration on the film "It Ends With Us." Baldoni filed a $400 million defamation lawsuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, alleging that Lively collaborated with the New York Times to damage his reputation and that Reynolds interfered with the film's production. Lively's team denies these allegations.

elmundo.es

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

May 7, 13:17

Valencia Flood Victims Consider Lawsuit Against Vox Spokesperson for Defamation

The Association of Victims of the Dana Horta Sud-Valencia flood is considering a lawsuit against Vox spokesperson José María Llanos for defamation after he accused the association of being controlled by political parties and only representing those with vested interests, following the October 29, 20...

Valencia Flood Victims Consider Lawsuit Against Vox Spokesperson for Defamation

The Association of Victims of the Dana Horta Sud-Valencia flood is considering a lawsuit against Vox spokesperson José María Llanos for defamation after he accused the association of being controlled by political parties and only representing those with vested interests, following the October 29, 20...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of Vox spokesperson José María Llanos's accusations against the Association of Victims of the Dana Horta Sud-Valencia flood?

The president of the Association of Victims of the Dana Horta Sud-Valencia flood, Christian Lesaec, is considering a lawsuit against Vox spokesperson José María Llanos for defamation. Llanos accused victim associations of being controlled by political parties and only representing "those with vested interests". This follows Llanos's justification for excluding victim associations from an initial list of witnesses in a regional parliamentary investigation into the flood, which killed 228 people.

smh.com.au

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

May 1, 07:16

Secret Recording Admitted in Roberts-Smith Defamation Appeal

A secret recording of journalist Nick McKenzie discussing Ben Roberts-Smith's legal strategy with a witness in Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in his appeal, potentially impacting the trial's outcome and raising questions about journalistic ethics.

Secret Recording Admitted in Roberts-Smith Defamation Appeal

A secret recording of journalist Nick McKenzie discussing Ben Roberts-Smith's legal strategy with a witness in Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in his appeal, potentially impacting the trial's outcome and raising questions about journalistic ethics.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What is the significance of the secret recording's admission to the Roberts-Smith defamation appeal?

A secret recording of a conversation between journalist Nick McKenzie and a witness (Person 17) in Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation trial has been admitted as evidence in Roberts-Smith's appeal. The recording, obtained by Roberts-Smith's lawyers, allegedly shows McKenzie discussing Roberts-Smith's legal strategy. Roberts-Smith claims this constitutes a miscarriage of justice.

kathimerini.gr

🌐 65% Global Worthiness

Apr 29, 16:13

Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of ...

Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of ...

Progress

56% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate consequences resulted from the heated exchange between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis during the Parliament session?

A heated exchange occurred in the Greek Parliament between Health Minister Ad. Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis during a bill's discussion. Georgiadis mentioned an upcoming defamation lawsuit against Polakis, highlighting Polakis's multiple postponements and challenging him to attend court. Polakis responded by criticizing Georgiadis's past actions and the lawsuit's merit.", A2="The conflict stemmed from accusations by Polakis against Georgiadis, concerning alleged favoritism towards a specific investor. Georgiadis defended his actions, citing the investor's current imprisonment and the dismissal of previous investigations. This incident highlights deep-seated political divisions and ongoing legal battles within the Greek political landscape.", A3="The clash foreshadows increased political tension and legal ramifications. Polakis's defiance and Georgiadis's forceful response signal a potential escalation of their conflict. This event underscores broader issues of accountability and transparency within Greek politics and the judiciary.", Q1="What immediate consequences resulted from the heated exchange between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis during the Parliament session?", Q2="What are the underlying causes of the conflict between Minister Georgiadis and MP Polakis, and what broader implications does it have for Greek politics?", Q3="What are the potential long-term implications of this incident, considering its impact on public trust and the legal processes involved?", ShortDescription="Greek Parliament witnessed a heated debate between Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis and SYRIZA MP Pavlos Polakis, marked by accusations, counter-accusations, and personal attacks, escalating from a bill discussion to a confrontation highlighting a pre-existing defamation lawsuit and accusations of corruption and mismanagement.", ShortTitle="Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange")) # Greek Parliament Clash: Georgiadis and Polakis in Heated Exchange

npr.org

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Apr 23, 01:14

Jury Rules in Favor of New York Times in Palin Defamation Case

A New York jury found The New York Times not liable for defamation in Sarah Palin's lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that contained an error about her political action committee and the 2011 Arizona shooting; the Times quickly corrected the error, but Palin claimed reputational harm.

Jury Rules in Favor of New York Times in Palin Defamation Case

A New York jury found The New York Times not liable for defamation in Sarah Palin's lawsuit stemming from a 2017 editorial that contained an error about her political action committee and the 2011 Arizona shooting; the Times quickly corrected the error, but Palin claimed reputational harm.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of the jury's verdict in the Sarah Palin defamation lawsuit against The New York Times?

A New York jury ruled that The New York Times did not defame Sarah Palin in a 2017 editorial containing a factual error. This decision follows a 2022 ruling, but an appeals court reinstated the lawsuit. Palin expressed relief and plans to continue advocating for press accountability.

Showing 37 to 48 of 180 results