Tag #Defamation

Showing 25 to 36 of 243 results

dailymail.co.uk

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Aug 22, 10:17

Lehrmann's Lawyer Appeals Rape Conviction, Sparks Controversy

Bruce Lehrmann's lawyer argued in the Federal Court that Justice Michael Lee's ruling in the Brittany Higgins rape case was flawed, describing the event as a 'soft rape,' a term that drew immediate social media condemnation from Ms. Higgins and judicial skepticism. The appeal concluded Thursday, a d...

Lehrmann's Lawyer Appeals Rape Conviction, Sparks Controversy

Bruce Lehrmann's lawyer argued in the Federal Court that Justice Michael Lee's ruling in the Brittany Higgins rape case was flawed, describing the event as a 'soft rape,' a term that drew immediate social media condemnation from Ms. Higgins and judicial skepticism. The appeal concluded Thursday, a d...

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What specific errors did Lehrmann's lawyer allege were present in Justice Lee's judgment, and what immediate impact did these allegations have on the court proceedings and public reaction?

Bruce Lehrmann's lawyer, Zali Burrows, argued in the Federal Court that Justice Michael Lee's judgment, which found Lehrmann guilty of raping Brittany Higgins, contained errors and misrepresented the events. Burrows described the rape as 'soft rape,' a term that baffled the judges and drew immediate criticism from Higgins on social media. The appeal hearing concluded a day early.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 21, 04:17

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Finding, Challenges Court's Definition

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court ruling that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins, arguing procedural unfairness and challenging the court's definition of rape; Lisa Wilkinson, who interviewed Higgins, also faces legal challenges.

Lehrmann Appeals Rape Finding, Challenges Court's Definition

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court ruling that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins, arguing procedural unfairness and challenging the court's definition of rape; Lisa Wilkinson, who interviewed Higgins, also faces legal challenges.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key arguments in Bruce Lehrmann's appeal against the Federal Court's finding of rape, and what are the potential implications of this legal challenge?

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that found him liable for raping Brittany Higgins. The court found that Lehrmann's actions, including encouraging Higgins to drink and disregarding her consent, constituted recklessness. Lehrmann maintains his innocence and argues he was denied procedural fairness.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 15, 10:15

Planned "Australia March" Sparks Concerns Over Racism and Neo-Nazi Links

A planned "March for Australia" on August 31st has sparked concerns due to its potentially racist slogans and links to neo-Nazis, with social media discussions quickly escalating into hateful rhetoric; organizers deny any such connections.

Planned "Australia March" Sparks Concerns Over Racism and Neo-Nazi Links

A planned "March for Australia" on August 31st has sparked concerns due to its potentially racist slogans and links to neo-Nazis, with social media discussions quickly escalating into hateful rhetoric; organizers deny any such connections.

Progress

48% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key concerns surrounding the planned "Australia March", and how might these concerns impact Australia's social and political climate?

An "Australia March" is planned for August 31st, advertised with slogans and imagery raising concerns about racism and neo-Nazi involvement. Social media discussions surrounding the event quickly devolved into racist comments and conspiracy theories, with a known neo-Nazi expressing support. Organizers deny any such connections.

us.cnn.com

🌐 75% Global Worthiness

Aug 15, 01:21

Melania Trump Sues Hunter Biden for $1 Billion Over Epstein Comments

Melania Trump is suing Hunter Biden for $1 billion for defamation over comments he made about her and Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein; the lawsuit, supported by President Trump, centers on a YouTube interview and could lead to a public clarification of the Trumps' ties to Epstein.

Melania Trump Sues Hunter Biden for $1 Billion Over Epstein Comments

Melania Trump is suing Hunter Biden for $1 billion for defamation over comments he made about her and Donald Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein; the lawsuit, supported by President Trump, centers on a YouTube interview and could lead to a public clarification of the Trumps' ties to Epstein.

Progress

36% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate implications of Melania Trump's $1 billion defamation lawsuit against Hunter Biden?

Melania Trump is suing Hunter Biden for $1 billion for defamation stemming from comments he made about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. President Trump confirmed he told his wife to pursue the lawsuit, indicating his support for the legal action. The lawsuit centers on a YouTube interview where Biden discussed the Trumps' alleged ties to Epstein, claims that Melania Trump refutes.

nbcnews.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 5, 22:15

Murdoch to Give Trump Regular Health Updates to Postpone Deposition

Rupert Murdoch will give President Trump regular health updates to postpone his deposition in Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal article about Jeffrey Epstein; the unusual agreement contrasts with Fox News' long-standing support for Trump.

Murdoch to Give Trump Regular Health Updates to Postpone Deposition

Rupert Murdoch will give President Trump regular health updates to postpone his deposition in Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal article about Jeffrey Epstein; the unusual agreement contrasts with Fox News' long-standing support for Trump.

Progress

32% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Murdoch's agreement to provide health updates contrast with the historical relationship between Fox News and President Trump?

Murdoch's health disclosures contrast with Fox News' long-standing support for Trump. This situation highlights the intertwined relationship between media moguls, political figures, and legal proceedings, particularly where significant financial interests are involved. The agreement to provide health updates is a direct response to concerns about Murdoch's ability to testify, stemming from his age and health.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 26, 16:11

Macrons Sue Owens Over False Gender Claim

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a US defamation lawsuit against right-wing podcaster Candace Owens for spreading the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man, highlighting the global spread of online misinformation and the challenges of combating such narratives through...

Macrons Sue Owens Over False Gender Claim

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a US defamation lawsuit against right-wing podcaster Candace Owens for spreading the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man, highlighting the global spread of online misinformation and the challenges of combating such narratives through...

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the immediate consequences of the Macrons' US lawsuit against Candace Owens, and how does it reflect broader global concerns about online misinformation?

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a US defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens for spreading the false claim that Brigitte Macron is a man. This follows a French court case where two women who propagated this rumor were initially found guilty but later acquitted on appeal. The Macrons argue the false narrative caused significant global humiliation.

theguardian.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 21, 10:15

Lehrmann's Defamation Appeal: Court Rejects Adjournment Requests

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 for a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation, claiming the omission of his name was a strategic decision to increase ratings, and that his lawyer's multiple requests for adjournments were denied.

Lehrmann's Defamation Appeal: Court Rejects Adjournment Requests

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 for a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation, claiming the omission of his name was a strategic decision to increase ratings, and that his lawyer's multiple requests for adjournments were denied.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key arguments in Bruce Lehrmann's defamation appeal, and what immediate implications could the ruling have on Australian media?

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a defamation ruling against Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 stemming from a 2021 interview about Brittany Higgins' rape allegation. Lehrmann's lawyer repeatedly requested early adjournments due to insufficient preparation time, which the court denied, highlighting the lawyer's perceived ample preparation time. The appeal challenges the court's finding that Lehrmann wasn't given an opportunity to address the type of rape alleged.

smh.com.au

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 20, 04:17

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Lehrmann Appeals Defamation Ruling After Court Finds Rape

Bruce Lehrmann is appealing a Federal Court decision that dismissed his defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson following a finding that he raped Brittany Higgins; the appeal argues procedural unfairness due to discrepancies between court findings and broadcast allegations.

Progress

60% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the Federal Court's finding of 'recklessness' regarding consent differ from the allegations presented, and what impact did this discrepancy have on Lehrmann's defense?

Lehrmann's appeal hinges on the assertion that he wasn't given a fair opportunity to respond to the specific version of events presented by the court. He claims the court's finding of a 'non-violent rape' differs from the 'violent rape' described in the broadcast, leading to procedural unfairness. This highlights the complexities of legal processes in high-profile cases and the potential for discrepancies in different standards of proof.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 15, 10:15

Texas Judge Orders Sale of Alex Jones' Infowars Assets

A Texas judge ordered the sale of Alex Jones' Infowars assets to pay over \$1 billion in judgments to Sandy Hook shooting victims' families, potentially shutting down his studio but not his broadcasts; The Onion is reportedly working to acquire the platform.

Texas Judge Orders Sale of Alex Jones' Infowars Assets

A Texas judge ordered the sale of Alex Jones' Infowars assets to pay over \$1 billion in judgments to Sandy Hook shooting victims' families, potentially shutting down his studio but not his broadcasts; The Onion is reportedly working to acquire the platform.

Progress

44% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What immediate impact will the Texas judge's order have on Alex Jones and Infowars?

A Texas judge ordered the sale of Alex Jones' Infowars assets to satisfy over \$1 billion in judgments owed to Sandy Hook families. The order could shut down Jones' studio, though he claims to have a backup and intends to continue broadcasting. A receiver will oversee the sale, with proceeds benefiting the families.

forbes.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Aug 14, 07:17

AI Legal Developments in 2025: State and Federal Updates

In 2025, California and New York enacted new laws concerning AI-generated images and digital replicas, while federal efforts remain limited to the TAKE IT DOWN Act (regarding nude look-alikes), highlighting inconsistencies in state and federal approaches to AI regulation and intellectual property.

AI Legal Developments in 2025: State and Federal Updates

In 2025, California and New York enacted new laws concerning AI-generated images and digital replicas, while federal efforts remain limited to the TAKE IT DOWN Act (regarding nude look-alikes), highlighting inconsistencies in state and federal approaches to AI regulation and intellectual property.

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Reduced Inequality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

What are the key legal changes in 2025 regarding the use of AI to create digital replicas of individuals?

In 2025, California strengthened its Right of Publicity laws, prohibiting contracts for digital replicas without exceptions (lawyer representation, non-replacement of work, or SAG-AFTRA membership). New York mandated disclosure for AI-generated human images in ads unless the image is recognizable or in expressive works. Federal action remains limited, with the TAKE IT DOWN Act addressing AI-generated nude look-alikes.

abcnews.go.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 28, 22:14

Trump Sues Murdoch, WSJ for $10 Billion Over Epstein Letter

Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over a 2024 article alleging Trump sent a letter to Jeffrey Epstein; Trump denies the letter's authenticity and wants a fast deposition from the 94-year-old Murdoch, claiming Murdoch was told the letter was fake before ...

Trump Sues Murdoch, WSJ for $10 Billion Over Epstein Letter

Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over a 2024 article alleging Trump sent a letter to Jeffrey Epstein; Trump denies the letter's authenticity and wants a fast deposition from the 94-year-old Murdoch, claiming Murdoch was told the letter was fake before ...

Progress

40% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How does Trump's claim of direct communication with Murdoch before publication factor into the legal strategy, and what evidence supports this claim?

Trump's lawsuit alleges that Murdoch was informed the letter was fake before publication, yet proceeded anyway. This claim of prior knowledge is central to Trump's argument of "actual malice", a key element in defamation cases. Murdoch's deposition is sought to determine the extent of his involvement in the decision to publish.

bbc.com

🌐 85% Global Worthiness

Jul 24, 07:15

Macrons Sue Candace Owens for Defamation Over False Gender Claims

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte are suing US conservative commentator Candace Owens for defamation in Delaware after she repeatedly claimed on social media and her podcast that Brigitte Macron was born male, a claim the Macrons say is false and damaging.

Macrons Sue Candace Owens for Defamation Over False Gender Claims

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte are suing US conservative commentator Candace Owens for defamation in Delaware after she repeatedly claimed on social media and her podcast that Brigitte Macron was born male, a claim the Macrons say is false and damaging.

Progress

52% Bias Score

ShareSaveArticle

Gender Equality

12345678

Previous 1 of 8 Next

How did the spread of this conspiracy theory through social media contribute to the legal action taken by the Macrons?

The lawsuit highlights the global reach and impact of online disinformation. Owens's claims, shared with her nearly 7 million X followers, were part of a broader pattern of promoting conspiracy theories. This case underscores the legal challenges in combating online falsehoods and their potential to damage reputations, even those of world leaders.

Showing 25 to 36 of 243 results